Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T11:52:12.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

End-user involvement in health technology assessment (HTA) development: A way to increase impact

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2005

Maurice McGregor
Affiliation:
McGill University and McGill University Health Centre
James M. Brophy
Affiliation:
McGill University and McGill University Health Centre

Abstract

Objectives: A mechanism to increase the influence of Health Technology Assessments (HTAs) on hospital policy decisions was developed.

Methods: We describe the process and results of an experiment in which a local in-hospital HTA unit was created to provide sound evidence on technology acquisition issues, and to formulate locally appropriate policy recommendations. The Unit consists of a small technical staff that accesses and synthesizes the evidence incorporating local health and economic data, and a Policy Committee that develops policy recommendations based on this evidence. It represents administration, health-care professionals, patients, and representatives of the clinical disciplines affected by each issue. The level of success of the Unit was independently evaluated.

Results: To date, 16 reports have been completed, each within 2–4 months. Five recommended unrestricted use, seven recommended rejection, and four recommended very limited use of the technology in question. All have been incorporated into hospital policy. Budget impact is estimated at approximately $3 million of savings per year.

Conclusions: This local in-house HTA agency has had a major impact on the adoption of new technology. Probable reasons for success are (i) relevance (selection of topics by administration with on-site production of HTAs allowing them to incorporate local data and reflect local needs), (ii) timeliness, and (iii) formulation of policy reflecting community values by a local representative committee. Because over one third of all health-care costs are incurred in the hospital, diffusion of this model could have a significant effect on the quantity and quality of health-care spending.

Type
RESEARCH REPORTS
Copyright
© 2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Marshall D, Menon D. 1990. Technology assessment in hospitals: A Canadian perspective. In: Proceedings of the sixth annual meeting of the International Society for Technology Assessment in Health Care. Houston, TX. May 20
McGregor M. 2002 Should the McGill University Health Center replace the Jelco/cathlon catheter by the ProtectIVPlus catheter for intravenous infusions. The Technology Assessment Unit of the McGill University Health Centre. Available at: www.mcgill.ca/tau/.
McGregor M, Chen J. 2003 Use of the implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) at the McGill University Health Centre. The Technology Assessment Unit of the McGill University Health Centre. Available at: www.mcgill.ca/tau/.
Oliver A, Mossialos E, Robinson R. 2004 Health technology assessment and its influence on health-priority setting. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 20: 110.Google Scholar
Roehrig C, Kargus K. 2003 Health technology assessment in Canada and in the G-7 countries: A comparative analysis of the role of HTA agencies in the policy-making process. Ottawa: Health Canada. http://hc-sc.gc.ca/english/care/hcsd_wp_ hta.htm.
Romanow RJ. 2003 Building on values. The future of health care in Canada. Ottawa: Health Canada; 8385. Available at: www.hc-sc.gc.ca/english/pdf/romanow/pdfs/HCC_Final_Report.pd.
Stevens A, Milne R. 2004 Health technology assessment in England and Wales. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 20: 1124.Google Scholar