Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:01:05.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Spatial Structure Of Socio-Economic Attributes Of Turkish Provinces*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2009

Melvin Albaum  and
Christopher S. Davies
Melvin Albaum
Affiliation:
University of Colorado
Christopher S. Davies
Affiliation:
University Of Texas
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

During the past several decades, deliberate attempts to move from a ‘traditional’ to a ‘modern’ form of society have been made in the Republic of Turkey, resulting in rapid change economically, socially, and even politicallyI. The effort to change from a predominantly agrarian economy, and the concomitant increases in urbanization and industrialization, have had a profound effect on several sections of the country and have, to a large extent, created a whole new structure of spatial organization and patterns. Nevertheless, most of Turkey has been only slightly affected by the modernization process, and remains unaltered by the progress of economic and social development. Although economic growth and capital expenditures for development have steadily increased, they have not been uniformly distributed throughout the Republic, resulting in distinct regional disparities and a socio-economic system with many dualisms in its structure2.

Type
Articles
Information
International Journal of Middle East Studies , Volume 4 , Issue 3 , July 1973 , pp. 288 - 310
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

1.Beeley, B. W. ‘Spatial Aspects of Development in Turkey’. Paper presented to Association of American Geographers Meeting, 1968.Google Scholar
2.Eren, N.Turkey, Today and Tomorrow. New York, Frederick A. Praeger, 1963.Google Scholar
3.Enrinç, S. & Tunçdilek, N. ‘The Agricultural Regions of Turkey.’ Geographical Review, vol. 42 (1952), pp. 179–203.Google Scholar
4.Fişek, H. N. & Shorter, F. C.. ‘Fertility Control in Turkey.’ Demography, vol. 5 (1968), pp. 578–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Fisher, W. B.The Middle East. London: Methuen, 1963.Google Scholar
6.Frey, F. W.Regional Variations in Rural Turkey. Report No. 4, Rural Development Research Project. Cambridge: M.I.T. Center for International Studies, 1966.Google Scholar
7.Harman, H. H.Modern Factor Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1967.Google Scholar
8.Helling, B. & Helling, G.. Rural Turkey: A New Socio-Statistical Appraisal. Istanbul: Istanbul University Institute of Economics and Sociology, Pub. No. 102, 1958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Hershlag, Z. Y.Turkey: The Challenge of Growth. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1968.Google Scholar
10.Kazamias, A. M.Education and Quest for Modernity in Turkey. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1966.Google Scholar
11.Keleş, R. Y.Regional Disparities in Turkey. Ankara: Ankara University Faculty of Political Science, 1964.Google Scholar
12.King, L. J.Statistical Analysis in Geography. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1969.Google Scholar
13.Lee, E. S. ‘A Theory of Migration.’ Demography, vol.3 (1966), pp. 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Lewis, B.The Emergence of Modern Turkey. London: Oxford University, 1961.Google Scholar
15.Mango, A.Turkey. New York, Walker, 1968.Google Scholar
16.Marble, D. F.Some Computer Programs for Geographic Research. Special Publication No. 1, Department of Geography, Northwestern University, 1967.Google Scholar
17.Olçen, N. ‘The Geographical Distribution of Public Investments.’ Planning in Turkey, ed. Ilkin, S. and Inanç, E.. Ankara: Middle East Technical University, 1967.Google Scholar
18.Rivkin, M. D.Area Development for National Growth: The Turkish Precedent. New York, Frederick A. Praeger, 1965.Google Scholar
19.Robinson, R. D. ‘Turkey's Agrarian Revolution and the Problem of Urbanization.’ Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 22 (1958), pp. 307–405.Google Scholar
20.Robinson, R. D.The First Turkish Republic: A Case Study in National Development. Cambridge: Harvard University, 1963.Google Scholar
21.Rummel, R. J. ‘Understanding Factor Analysis.’ Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 2 (1967), pp. 444–80.Google Scholar
22.Schachter, G. ‘Regional Dualism in Turkish Development.’ Paper presented to Middle East Studies Association of North America Meeting, 1970.Google Scholar
23.Semple, E. C. ‘The Regional Geography of Turkey: A Review of Banse's Work.’ Geographical Review, vol. 2 (1921), pp. 338–50.Google Scholar
4.Sewell, G. H.Squatter Settlements in Turkey: Analysis of a Social, Political, and Economic Problem. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Economics and Social Science, M.I.T., 1964.Google Scholar
25.Shorter, F. C. (ed.). Four Studies on Economic Development in Turkey. London: Frank Cass, 1967.Google Scholar
26.Türk Coğrafya Kongresi Kitabi. (Book of the Turkish Geographical Congress.) Ankara: Turkish Geographical Congress, 1941.Google Scholar
27.Ward, J. H. ‘Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function.’ Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 58 (1963), pp. 236–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar