Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:41:25.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A printed multiband MIMO antenna with decoupling element

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2019

Ziyu Xu
Affiliation:
School of Geophysics and Information Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing, China
Qisheng Zhang
Affiliation:
School of Geophysics and Information Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing, China
Linyan Guo*
Affiliation:
School of Geophysics and Information Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing, China
*
Author for correspondence: Linyan Guo, E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

A printed multiband Multi-Input Multiple-Output (MIMO) antenna is proposed in this paper. This MIMO antenna system comprises two symmetric printed monopole antennas. Each antenna element consists of multiple bend lines, producing four resonant modes and covering the GSM900, PCS, LTE2300, and 5G bands. Simulated and measured results prove that the proposed MIMO antenna can be applied to traditional 2G, 3G, 4G, and present 5G mobile communication. By etching four inverted L-shaped grooves on its ground plate, mutual coupling between the adjacent antenna elements has been suppressed. This makes the |S21| at all four resonant modes is lower than −40 dB. In addition, its low coupling mechanism has been analyzed by surface current distribution. The designed multiband MIMO antenna provides an idea of reference to realize low mutual coupling between antenna elements, which is also realizable in infrared or optical regimes with appropriate designs.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Gunduz, D, Khojastepour, MA, Goldsmith, A and Poor, HV (2010) Multi-hop MIMO relay networks: diversity-multiplexing trade-off analysis. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 9, 17381747.Google Scholar
2Xu, Z, Sfar, S and Blum, RS (2010) Receive antenna selection for closely-spaced antennas with mutual coupling. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 9, 652661.Google Scholar
3Lu, S, Hui, HT and Bialkowski, M (2008) Optimizing MIMO channel capacities under the influence of antenna mutual coupling. IEEE Antennas & Wireless Propagation Letters 7, 287290.Google Scholar
4Cheung, SW, Li, QL, Wu, D, Zhou, CF and Wang, B (2017) Defected ground structure with two resonances for decoupling of dual-band MIMO antenna. IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation & Usnc/ursi National Radio Science Meeting IEEE, 1645–1646.Google Scholar
5Chiu, CY, Cheng, CH, Murch, RD and Rowell, CR (2007) Reduction of mutual coupling between closely-packed antenna elements. IEEE Transactions on Antennas & Propagation 55, 17321738.Google Scholar
6Rahmat-Samii, Y and Mosallaei, H (2002) Electromagnetic band-gap structures: classification, characterization, and applications. Antennas and Propagation, 2001. Eleventh International Conference on IET, 560–564 vol. 2.Google Scholar
7Li, Q and Feresidis, AP (2011) Miniaturised slit-patch EBG structures for decoupling PIFAs on handheld devices. Antennas and Propagation Conference IEEE, 1–4.Google Scholar
8Okuda, K, Sato, H and Takahashi, M (2016) Decoupling method for two-element MIMO antenna using meander branch shape. 2015 International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation (ISAP), Hobart, TAS, Australia. IEEE.Google Scholar
9Sato, H, Koyanagi, Y, Ogawa, K and Takahashi, M (2014) A decoupling method for MIMO antenna arrays using branch shape elements. Ieice Communications Express 3, 330334.Google Scholar
10Gil, I and Fernández-García, R (2016) Study of metamaterial resonators for decoupling of a MIMO-PIFA system. International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility – Emc Europe IEEE, 52–556.Google Scholar
11Zhang, XY, Xue, CD, Cao, YF and Ding, CF (2017) Compact MIMO antenna with embedded decoupling network. IEEE International Conference on Computational Electromagnetics IEEE, 64–66.Google Scholar
12Wu, D, Cheung, SW, Li, QL and Yuk, TI (2016) Decoupling using diamond-shaped patterned ground resonator for small MIMO antennas. Iet Microwaves Antennas & Propagation 11, 177183.Google Scholar
13Li, JF, Chu, QX and Huang, TG (2012) A compact wideband MIMO antenna with two novel bent slits. IEEE Transactions on Antennas & Propagation 60, 482489.Google Scholar
14Toktas, A (2017) G-shaped band-notched ultra-wideband MIMO antenna system for mobile terminals. Iet Microwaves Antennas & Propagation 11, 718725.Google Scholar
15Wang, Y and Du, Z (2014) A wideband printed dual-antenna with three neutralization lines for mobile terminals. IEEE Transactions on Antennas & Propagation 62, 14951500.Google Scholar
16Xu, S, Zhang, M, Shi, X, Liu, D, Wen, H and Wang, J (2017) Anisotropic metamaterial based decoupling strategy for MIMO antenna in mobile handsets. International Workshop on Antenna Technology: Small Antennas, Innovative Structures, and Applications IEEE, 34–37.Google Scholar
17Blanch, S Romeu, J and Corbella, I (2015) Exact representation of antenna system diversity performance from input parameter description. Frequenz 39, 705707.Google Scholar