Introduction
Wireless power transfer (WPT) is a novel energy transfer technology that transfers electrical energy from the power source to a load without direct contact with charging equipment. WPT technology avoids the deficiencies of traditional wired power transfer, such as poor flexibility and low safety. In 2007, Soljacic’s proposed a magnetic coupling resonant WPT (MCR-WPT) technology [Reference Kurs, Karalis, Moffatt, Joannopoulos, Fisher and Soljačić1]. This technology is based on magnetic resonance theory and relies on near-field resonant coupling. Because MCR-WPT technology has the advantages of moderate transmission distance and power, it has been employed in electric vehicles, medical equipment, and portable electronic products [Reference RamRakhyani, Mirabbasi and Chiao2–Reference Mi, Buja, Choi and Rim4]. However, the power transfer efficiency (PTE) drops dramatically as the distance increases. Improving transmission performance has become a research topic for MCR-WPT technology.
Currently, there are several approaches to improve the PTE of MCR-WPT systems, including designing a high-Q resonant coil and adding a relay coil or metamaterial (MM) slab [Reference Kim, Son, Kim and Park5–Reference Fan, Tang, Su and Zhang7]. As a composite material, MMs have many exotic properties, including the Doppler effect, inverse Cherenkov radiation, and negative refraction index [Reference Sun, Fan, Zhang, Zhang, Shi, Wang, Xie, Wang, Fan, Liu, Liu, Li, Yan and Guo8]. Therefore, it has been used in a wide range of fields including invisible cloak, superlens, and magnetic resonance imaging [Reference Zhang and Liu9–Reference Freire, Jelinek, Marques and Lapine11]. The negative refraction index has shown great potential in the MCR-WPT technology because it can enhance evanescent waves and improve the coupling between coils. In 2010, Choi et al. proposed an MM with a real part of permeability equal to −1 [Reference Choi and Seo12]. It was demonstrated that the negative permeability MM was used to improve the PTE of MCR-WPT systems. Urzhumov presented a theoretical analysis on the MCR-WPT system with MM, in which the coil was regarded as a magnetic dipole and the MM slab as infinite [Reference Urzhumov and Smith13]. It indicates that even if MMs have a loss, the PTE of systems with the MM will be higher than that of the original system. In addition, the effect of different MM structures on the PTE of systems was investigated by Li et al. [Reference Li, Wang, Yao, Zhang and Tang14], and the results showed that the ranking of the four structures on performance improvement of the system is as follows: 3D > 2-slab > 1-slab > 2D. Although a great deal of work has been carried out on the MCR-WPT system with MMs, there are few studies on the influence of the period, position, and layer of MM slabs on the system.
In this work, the influence of the MM on PTE of the MCR-WPT system is investigated to improve its performance. First, the regulation principle of the MM in the electromagnetic field is theoretically analyzed. The MCR-WPT system working at 6.78 MHz is built in the high-frequency simulation software HFSS. A negative permeability MM with the advantages of lightweight and small size is designed and fabricated to meet the requirements of the system. Then, six arrays of slabs are constructed by MM units, which are placed in different positions of the system to evaluate the impact of MMs on PTEs under different conditions. The experimental measurements show that the highest PTE improvement increases by 20.6% through inserting a 
$6 \times 6$ MM slab in the middle. When the MM slab is near the Tx coil or Rx coil, a 
$1 \times 1$ or 
$6 \times 6$ MM slab should be used for the optimal PTE, respectively. Beyond that, the systems with two MM slabs and three MM slabs are also investigated. The measured PTEs of the systems with two slabs and three slabs increase by 29.3% and 22.6%, respectively. The experiment results show that the improvement of two MM slabs is better than one slab and three slabs.
Analysis of MCR-WPT system with MM
Theoretical analysis on a dual-coil MCR-WPT system with MM
Circuit theory and coupled mode theory are general methods to evaluate the transmission performance of MCR-WPT systems. Compared with the four-coil MCR-WPT system, the dual-coil system has the advantages of simple structure and excellent space occupation, so the dual-coil MCR-WPT system is analyzed, which consists of Tx and Rx coils. According to the equivalent circuit theory, the plane spiral coil can be regarded as a circuit composed of resistance, capacitance, and inductance, and the equivalent circuit diagram is shown in Fig. 1.
Figure 1. The equivalent circuit diagram of dual-coil MCR-WPT system.
M tr is the mutual inductance between Tx and Rx coils. 
$V_{\rm s}, R_{\rm s}$, and Z L represent power source and source resistance and load resistance, respectively. 
$R_{\rm t}, L_{\rm t}$, and C t denote the resistance, inductance, and capacitance of the Tx coil, respectively. 
$R_{\rm r}, L_{\rm r}$, and C r denote the resistance, inductance, and capacitance of the Rx coil, respectively. According to the equivalent circuit model, the KVL equation can be obtained
\begin{equation}
\left\{\begin{array}{l}
\left(R_{\rm s}+j \omega L_{\rm t}+R_{\rm t}+\frac{1}{j \omega C_{\rm t}}\right) I_{\rm t}-j \omega M_{\rm tr} I_{\rm r}=V_{\rm s} \\
\left(R_{\rm r}+j \omega L_{\rm r}+Z_{\rm L}+\frac{1}{j \omega C_{\rm r}}\right) I_{\rm r}-j \omega M_{\rm tr} I_{\rm t}=0
\end{array}\right.
\end{equation}In a deep subwavelength, MMs can also be represented by RLC circuits. The capacitance is derived from the scattered field formed between the resonator, and the inductance is determined by the induced current distribution of the resonator structure. The resistance and induced current distribution are related to the ohmic loss of the unit. Thus, the equivalent circuit diagram of a dual-coil MCR-WPT system with MMs is represented in Fig. 2.
Figure 2. The equivalent circuit diagram of a dual-coil MCR-WPT system with MMs.
By using the equivalent circuit theory and the mutual coupling theory, the KVL equations of the MCR-WPT system with MMs can be shown as follows:
\begin{equation}
\left\{\begin{array}{l}
\left( {{R_{\rm s}} + j\omega {L_{\rm t}} + {R_{\rm t}} + \frac{1}{{j\omega {C_{\rm t}}}}} \right){I_{\rm t}} + j\omega {M_{{\rm t}i}}{I_i} + j\omega {M_{\rm tr}}{I_{\rm r}} = {V_{\rm s}}\\
j\omega {M_{{\rm t}i}}{I_{\rm t}} + \left( {{R_i} + j\omega {L_i} + \frac{1}{{j\omega {C_i}}}} \right){I_i} + j\omega {M_{ij}}{I_j}+ j\omega {M_{{\rm r}i}}{I_{\rm r}} = 0\\
\left( {{R_{\rm r}} + j\omega {L_{\rm r}} + {Z_{\rm L}} + \frac{1}{{j\omega {C_{\rm r}}}}} \right){I_{\rm r}} + j\omega {M_{{\rm r}i}}{I_i} - j\omega {M_{\rm tr}}{I_{\rm t}} = 0\
\end{array}\right.
\end{equation} 
$M_{{\rm t}i}$ and 
$M_{{\rm r}i}$ represent the mutual inductance between the Tx coil and the ith unit and the mutual inductance between the Rx coil and the ith unit, respectively. M ij is the mutual inductance between the ith unit and the jth unit (
$i \ne j$).
Electromagnetic field regulation of MMs
It is known from Maxwell’s equations that for conventional materials, their wave vector {k, electric vector {E, and magnetic field {H obey the right-handed rule. In 1967, Veselago predicted the properties of left-handed materials [Reference Veselago15], that is, materials with negative permittivity and permeability. It was not until 2001 that Smith experimentally proved that left-handed material has a negative refractive index [Reference Shelby, Smith and Schultz16].
According to Snell’s Law, reflection and refraction occur when electromagnetic waves are incident from one media to another. Assuming that both media are conventional materials, the incident wave and the refracted wave will lie on both sides of the normal. If a medium is a left-handed material, the refracted wave and the incident wave will be on the same side of the normal because of the need to meet the requirements of the continuity boundary condition, as shown in Fig. 3.
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of interface refraction.
Considering the negative refraction effect of the MM, if it is placed between the Tx coil and Rx coil, the magnetic field induced by the current in the Tx coil passes through the MM and undergoes negative refraction to concentrate the magnetic field around the Rx coil. For the MCR-WPT system without the MM slab, the magnetic field will diverge during propagation, as shown in Fig. 4. When adding an MM slab in the system, the magnetic field distribution near the Rx coil is significantly improved. In other words, MMs increase the PTE of the MCR-WPT system by improving the magnetic field density and enhancing the coupling of the resonant coils.
Figure 4. Magnetic field enhancement effect of resonant coils based on MM slab.
Application of negative permeability MM in MCR-WPT system
Design of MCR-WPT system with MMs
Based on the practical application of wireless charging, a dual-coil MCR-WPT system with resonant frequency at 6.78 MHz is proposed, and their structural parameters as shown in Table 1. The Tx coil and Rx coil are both planar spiral coils wound with copper tubes, which have the advantages of compact structure and easy installation.
Table 1. Geometry parameters of Tx and Rx coils
MMs have both negative permittivity and permeability; however, in a deep subwavelength, the magnetic field and electric field are decoupled. Therefore, the amplification of evanescent waves can be realized only by promising that the effective permeability is negative [Reference Pendry17]. In general, MMs are composed of substrate and resonator. When electromagnetic waves are vertically incident on the surface of MMs, a circular current will be induced on the resonator and charges will also accumulate in the gaps of the spiral turns. At this point, the MM can be regarded as the RLC resonant circuit, which conforms to the like-Lorentz model to produce a negative permeability [Reference Ishimaru, Lee, Kuga and Jandhyala18].
Since the constitutive parameters of the MM are determined by its structure, the permeability will change with its structural parameters. Figure 5 shows the relationship between the permeability of the MM and its structural parameters; the solid line represents the real part of the effective permeability and the dashed line represents the imaginary part. It is worth noting that when one parameter is changed, the rest remains unchanged. When the number of spiral turns N increases, the capacitance and inductance of the MM also increase and the resonant frequency and permeability decrease. If the line width w of the spiral increases, the resonant frequency also decreases. Increasing the line spacing s will reduce the coupling between the spirals, contributing to the resonant frequency shift to high. In addition, the purpose of reducing the resonant frequency can also be achieved by decreasing the thickness t of the substrate.
Figure 5. Effective permeability of the MM with different structure parameter variation: (a) turn of spiral N, (b) line width of spiral w, (c) line spacing of spiral s, and (d) thickness of substrate t.
Based on the above analysis, the design rules of MMs can be summarized that increasing the number of turns and line width of the spirals will reduce the resonant frequency; on the contrary, increasing the spacing of the spirals and the thickness of the substrate will increase the resonant frequency.
In order to satisfy the needs of the MCR-WPT system, an MM with a real part of effective permeability of −1 at 6.78 MHz is proposed according to the design rules, in which the substrate is an FR-4 and the resonators are copper. The resonators are etched on both sides of the substrate by the printed circuit board, and the structure is shown in Fig. 6. In this way, not only low-frequency MM can be obtained but also the coupling between the topological structures on both sides can be enhanced [Reference Li, Liu, Zhang and Xue19], and the specific structural parameters are shown in Table 2.
Figure 6. Geometry of the MM: (a) top view, (b) bottom view, and (c) side view.
Table 2. Geometry parameters of Tx and Rx coils
From the above analysis, it can be concluded that increasing the number of turns and line width of the spirals will reduce the resonant frequency; on the contrary, increasing the spacing of the spirals and the thickness of the substrate will increase the resonant frequency.
The negative permeability MM is optimized and designed in the high-frequency magnetic field simulation software HFSS by using full-wave simulations. Then the effective permeability is calculated by the S-parameter retrieval based on the Kramers–Kronig relationship [Reference Smith, Vier, Koschny and Soukoulis20, Reference Szabó, Park, Hedge and Li21], and the real and imaginary parts of the permeability are extracted, respectively. Figure 7 shows the effective permeability of the MM; the real part is negative at 6 to 8.1 MHz, where the real and imaginary parts are −1 and 0.45i at 6.78 MHz, respectively. The imaginary part of the permeability represents its loss.
Figure 7. Effective permeability of the MM.
Simulations of MCR-WPT system with MMs
In order to study the influence of MMs on the PTE of the MCR-WPT system, the focusing effect of MM slab with various arrays on the PTE of the system when they are inserted in different positions are studied; the three positions are shown in Fig. 8. The MM-based MCR-WPT system consists of the Tx coil, the Rx coil, and MM slabs, where D is the transmission distance between Tx and Rx coils and d is the distance from the MM slab to the coil, fixed at 5 cm.
Figure 8. Schematic diagram of MM slab placed at different positions of the MCR-WPT system: (a) in the middle, (b) near the Tx coil, and (c) near the Rx coil.
To observe the magnetic field distribution of the MCR-WPT system, an MCR-WPT system operating at 6.7 MHz is built in HFSS to perform simulation, as shown in Fig. 9(a). Moreover, the systems with 
$1 \times 1$ to 
$6 \times 6$ MM slabs placed in five different positions are also constructed. Figure 9(b)–(f) shows the results of different MM slabs at three positions in the system, respectively. Compared with the MCR-WPT system without the MM slab, the magnetic field intensity of the system with the MM slab is improved to varying degrees. When the MM slab is placed in the middle of the system, the improvement of the magnetic field distribution increases with the increase of arrays. When the MM slab is close to the Rx coil, the enhancement in the magnetic field distribution of the system is consistent with the trend in the middle position, but the improvement is slight. It is worth noting that only a 
$1 \times 1$ MM slab can improve the magnetic field density when it is close to the Tx coil, for the other arrays of MM slabs will significantly weaken the magnetic field density. It is demonstrated that the magnetic field is amplified by the negative permeability MM.
Figure 9. Comparison on magnetic field distribution of the MCR-WPT system: (a) without MM slab, (b) 
$6 \times 6$ MM slab in the middle, (c) 
$1 \times 1$ MM slab near the Tx coil, (d) 
$6 \times 6$ MM slab near the Tx coil, (e) 
$1 \times 1$ MM slab near the Rx coil, and (f) 
$6 \times 6$ MM slab near the Rx coil.
It can be seen from the simulation results that when the MM slab is in the center between the Tx coil and the Rx coil, the magnetic field is focused and enhanced after passing through the slab perpendicularly, thereby improving the PTE of the MCR-WPT system. Moreover, when the slab is placed near the Rx coil, since the magnetic field has already dissipated in the propagation, the effect of improving the transmission efficiency is small. However, when the MM slab is close to the Tx coil, the large size of the slab is responsible for the resonant frequency of the MCR-WPT system shifting, so the system is not resonant, and the PTE drops dramatically.
Experiment verification
The dual-coil MCR-WPT system is shown in Fig. 10, which consisted of the RF power supply, impedance matcher, Tx coil, Rx coil, oscilloscope, DC power source, supply voltage module, load resistor, and MM slabs. The RF power supply is responsible for inputting the alternating current of the operating frequency to the system, and the impedance matcher is used to obtain the maximum power output through the load impedance and the internal impedance of the excitation source to match each other. Due to the manufacturing errors of the coils, it is necessary to add tuning capacitors to ensure that the two coils resonate at 6.78 MHz to make the system reach maximum PTE.
Figure 10. The experimental setup of the MCR-WPT system with MM slabs.
For experiments, six periodical arrangement MM slabs are fabricated, as shown in Fig. 11. To study the effect of the MM slab on PTE, the MM slab is inserted in the system. The Rx coil is connected with a 60 Ω load. The power supply voltage module and the oscilloscope are used to measure the voltage across the load, and the PTE can be calculated by the output power and voltage values.
Figure 11. MM slabs of different periodic arrangements: (a) 
$1 \times 1$ array, (b) 
$2 \times 2$ arrays, (c) 
$3 \times 3$ arrays, (d) 
$4 \times 4$ arrays, (e) 
$5 \times 5$ arrays, and (f) 
$6 \times 6$ arrays.
Six kinds of MM slabs are placed in the middle of the system, the Tx coil, and the Rx coil, respectively. At the same time, the transmission distance of the system is changed and the change of the PTE of the system is measured. Fig. 12(a) shows the curve of the PTE change of the MM slabs when they are placed in the middle of the system, and it can be seen that the PTE increases with the increase of the period. It is worth noting that when the periodic arrangement changes from 
$1 \times 1$ to 
$3 \times 3$ arrays, the increase is small. When it is greater than 
$3 \times 3$ arrays, the PTE is significantly improved. The most improvement can be achieved when the slab is at 
$6 \times 6$ arrays, and the maximum efficiency improvement of 20.6% can be obtained. The PTE changes when the MM slab is placed near the Tx coil as shown in Fig. 12(b), and the efficiency can be improved by 9.2% at most under the condition when the array is 
$1 \times 1$. Compared with the middle position, the MM slab with a 
$1 \times 1$ array is more suitable to be placed near the Tx coil. However, the PTE will drop with the increase of the array. Figure 12(c) shows the curves of PTE changes when the MM slab is placed near the Rx coil. It can be seen that the influence of placing MM slabs with different periods near the Rx coil on the PTE is basically the same as that of placing them in the middle of the system, but the improvement is poor, even if the MM slab with 
$6 \times 6$ arrays can only be improved by 12.7% at most.
Figure 12. PTEs of MCR-WPT system with one MM slab: (a) in the middle, (b) near the Tx coil, and (c) near the Rx coil.
It can be concluded from the above results that when the MM slab is placed in the middle of the MCR-WPT system, the six kinds of arrays can all improve the PTE, and the maximum improvement is obtained by using a slab with 
$6 \times 6$ arrays. When the MM slab is closed to the Tx coil, only a 
$1 \times 1$ array can achieve the improvement for the system, but the improvement is small. Note that if the array exceeds 
$1 \times 1$, the PTE will drop. The reason for this phenomenon may be that the frequency splitting caused by the strong coupling between the MM slab and the MCR-WPT system in the near field leads to a significant drop in efficiency [Reference Zhang, Zhao and Chen22, Reference Zhao, Zhu, Zhu, Huang and Luo23]. When the MM slab is placed near the Rx coil, the trend is basically the same as when it is placed in the middle of the system, but the improvement effect is small. The experimental results indicate that MMs can achieve enhanced magnetic coupling and improve the PTE of the MCR-WPT system.
In order to further improve the PTE for MCR-WPT system, two MM slabs are used in the system. When two MM slabs are employed, it is necessary to investigate the influence of the spacing g 1 between two MM slabs on the PTE because g 1 is an important parameter. First, the distance between the Tx coil and the Rx coil is fixed at 30 cm and change the spacing of two slabs with 
$6 \times 6$ arrays. The relationship between PTE and g 1 is measured, and the result is shown in Fig. 13. It can be seen from figure that the curve of the PTE of the system changes with the increase of g. The highest PTE is 77.2% when 
$g_1 = 5$ cm. Compared with the system without MM slab, the PTE of the system with two slabs is improved by 29.3%.
Figure 13. The relationship between the spacing of two MM slabs and PTEs.
Based on previous experiments, when two MM slabs are placed in three positions, respectively, their arrays are consistent with one slab. When two MM slabs are placed in the middle of the system, 
$6 \times 6$ arrays can obtain the optimal improvement. The experimental result is shown in Fig. 14(a); two MM slabs reach a maximum PTE improvement of 29.3% when the distance is 30 cm, which is 8.6% higher than one MM slab. Because the MM slab is placed near the Tx coil, only 
$1 \times 1$ array can improve the PTE, so two MM slabs with a 
$1 \times 1$ array are also inserted at the same position. The experimental result is shown in Fig. 14(b), and the PTE is obtained 13.1% at 30 cm, which is 3.9% higher than that of one MM slab. Fig. 14(c) shows the PTE change curve when two MM slabs with 
$6 \times 6$ arrays are placed close to the Rx coil, and the PTE is improved by 16.8%, which is 4.1% higher than that of one MM slab. Therefore, the magnetic field enhancement of two MM slabs is better than that of one slab, which can obtain a larger improvement for the PTE.
Figure 14. PTEs of MCR-WPT system with two MM slabs: (a) in the middle, (b) near the Tx coil, and (c) near the Rx coil.
In addition, PTE of MCR-WPT with three MM slabs is also studied. Considering that the spacing g 2 between three MM slabs may be different from that of two slabs, it is also necessary to analyze the relationship between the PTE and spacing of three slabs. Similar to the previous measurement process, the transmission distance is also fixed at 30 cm, and three MM slabs are placed in the middle of the system. Change the spacing between slabs and measure the change in PTE to determine the optimal g 2. The results are shown in Fig. 15, and it can be seen that the PTE also rises with the increase of g 2 and then reaches the peak at 7 cm, and it finally decreases gradually.
Figure 15. The relationship between the spacing of three MM slabs and PTEs.
In conclusion, the optimal g 2 of three MM slabs is 7 cm. Furthermore, PTEs of the system with three MM slabs are measured. Figure 16(a) shows the PTE of three MM slabs placed in the middle of the system, when the distance is less than 30 cm, and the PTE will be suppressed. When the distance is 30 cm, three slabs are positive for the system, but the improvement is weak. Once the distance is greater than 40 cm, the improvement is slightly higher than one MM slab, and the optimal improvement is 22.6%. The PTEs of the system with three MM slabs close to the Tx coil is shown in Fig. 16(b), and it can be seen that only when the distance exceeds 40 cm, three MM slabs can improve transmission performance and achieve a maximum improvement of 7.1% at 50 cm. Fig. 16(c) shows that when placing three MM slabs near the Rx coil, the trend is same as in the middle position, achieving a maximum improvement of 10.9% at a distance of 40 cm.
Figure 16. PTEs of MCR-WPT system with three MM slabs: (a) in the middle, (b) near the Tx coil, and (c) near the Rx coil.
According to the above experimental results, it can be concluded that the MM slab can focus magnetic field to improve performance of MCR-WPT systems. A larger PTE improvement can be obtained by inserting two MM slabs, but the improvement of three MM slabs is poor. PTEs of the proposed MCR-WPT system with MM slabs under three conditions are compared specifically in Table 3.
Table 3. Comparison on highest PTE improvement under three cases.
Conclusion
In this paper, the principle of MCR-WPT with MMs is theoretically analyzed, indicating that MMs have great potential for improving efficiency. Then, to improve the PTE of MCR-WPT systems, a 6.78 MHz MCR-WPT system is established in HFSS software, and the MM unit is proposed for the system. It is shown that MMs can enhance the magnetic field between the Tx and Rx coils through many simulations. In order to verify the simulation results, the experimental setup of the MCR-WPT system and MM slabs are fabricated, and PTEs of the system are measured under different conditions. The experimental results demonstrated that when one MM slab is placed in the middle, near the Tx coil and the Rx coil, the highest PTE is obtained by adopting 
$6 \times 6$, 
$1 \times 1$, and 
$6 \times 6$ arrays, respectively. When a 
$6 \times 6$ MM slab is placed in the middle of the system, the PTE raises by 20.6%. Based on this, we also investigate PTEs of the system with multilayer MM slabs. The system with two MM slabs improves PTE by 29.3%, and the system with three MM slabs improves by 22.6%. Therefore, it can be concluded that the PTE improvement of two MM slabs is the best and that of one MM slab is the second but better than three MM slabs.
Acknowledgement
This work is supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under grant 61741126 and in part by the Guangxi Natural Science Foundation under grant 2022GXNSFAA035533.
Competing interests
All authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Xingming Fan received the Ph.D. degree in Mechatronic Engineering from Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China, in 2007. He is currently a professor with the Department of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Guilin University of Electronic Technology. His major research interest includes intelligent apparatus, electrical measurement, and high-voltage technology.
Haonan Zhang received the B.S. degree in College of Mechanical and Control Engineering from Guilin University of Technology, Guilin, China, in 2016. He is currently pursuing the M.S. degree in Electrical Engineering and Automation from Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin, China. His major research interest includes intelligent apparatus.
Xin Zhang is currently an Expert Experimenter with the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Guilin University of Electronic Technology. Her major research interest includes intelligent apparatus.
