Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:44:54.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reduction of the mutual coupling in patch antenna arrays based on EBG by using a planar frequency-selective surface structure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 September 2015

Ehsan Beiranvand ,
Majid Afsahy  and
Vahid Sharbati
Ehsan Beiranvand
Affiliation:
Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran. Phone: +98 9113703981
Majid Afsahy
Affiliation:
Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran. Phone: +98 9113703981
Vahid Sharbati*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran. Phone: +98 9113703981
*
Corresponding author: V. Sharbati Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper describes a new configuration of frequency-selective structure (FSS) structures to reduce mutual coupling between the radiating elements. Also, the antenna performance before and after the implementation of FSS have been investigated. The proposed configuration provides an improvement in mutual coupling by 14 dB (measured value) with a reduced edge-to-edge spacing of 23 mm. The reduction of mutual coupling between antenna elements is interesting in the electromagnetic and antenna community. The use of electromagnetic band-gap structures constructed by microstrip technology is a way to appease the mutual coupling problem. Periodic structures such as FSS can help in the reduction of mutual coupling using their ability of suppressing surface waves propagation in a given frequency range. The goal of this present study is to use it in patch antenna arrays, keeping both the element separation smaller than λ0 for grating lobes evasion and the patch antenna size large enough to have good antenna directivity. The results showed that the proposed configuration eliminates disadvantages of similar structures presented in the previous works.

Keywords

Mutual coupling reductionPatch antenna arrayFrequency-selective surface (FSS)Electromagnetic band gap (EBG)
Type
Research Papers
Information
International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , March 2017 , pp. 349 - 355
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Farahani, H.S.; Veysi, M.; Kamyab, M.; Tadjalli, A.: Mutual coupling reduction in patch antenna arrays using a UC-EBG superstrate. IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., 9 (2010), 57–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Ludwig, A.: Mutual coupling, gain and directivity of an array of two identical antennas. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., AP-24 (6) (1976), 837–841.Google Scholar
[3] Rajo-Iglesias, E.; Quevedo-Teruel, Ó.; Inclán-Sánchez, L.: Mutual coupling reduction in patch antenna arrays by using a planar EBG structure and a multilayer dielectric substrate. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 56 (6) (2008), 1648–1655.Google Scholar
[4] Farahani, H.; Veysi, M.; Kamyab, M.; Tadjalli, A.: Mutual coupling reduction in patch antenna arrays using a UC-EBG superstrate. IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., 9 (2010), 57–59.Google Scholar
[5] Expósito-Domínguez, G.; Fernández-González, J.M.; Padilla, P.; Sierra-Castaner, M.: New EBG solutions for mutual coupling reduction, in Proc. Sixth EuCAP, 2011, 2841–2844.Google Scholar
[6] Habashi, A.; Naurinia, J.; Ghbadi, C.: A rectangular defected ground structure for reduction of mutual coupling between closely spaced microstrip antennas, in Proc. 20th Iranian Conf. on Electrical Engineering, 2012, 1347–1350.Google Scholar
[7] Yang, X.M.; Liu, X.G.; Zhou, X.Y.; Cui, T.J.: Reduction of mutual coupling between closely packed patch antennas using waveguided metamaterials. IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., 11 (2012), 389–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Alsath, M.G.N.; Kanagasabai, M.; Balasubramanian, B.: Implementation of slotted meander-line resonators for isolation enhancement in microstrip patch antenna arrays. IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., 12 (2013), 15–18.Google Scholar
[9] Bait-Suwailam, M.M.; Siddiqui, O.F.; Ramahi, O.M.: Mutual coupling reduction between microstrip patch antennas using slotted-complementary split-ring resonators. IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., 9 (2010), 876–878.Google Scholar
[10] Weng, Y.F.; Cheung, S.W.; Yuk, T.I.: Design of multiple bandnotch using meander lines for compact ultra-wide band antennas. Microw., Antennas Propag., 6 (8) (2012), 908–914.Google Scholar
[11] Buell, K.; Mosallaei, H.; Sarabandi, K.: Metamaterial insulator enabled superdirective array. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 55 (4) (2007), 1074–1085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12] Yang, F.; Rahmat-Samii, Y.: Microstrip antennas integrated with electromagnetic band-gap (EBG) structures: a low mutual coupling design for array applications. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 51 (2003), 2936–2946.Google Scholar
[13] Yang, L.; Fan, M.; Chen, F.; She, J.; Feng, Z.: A novel compact electromagnetic-bandgap EBG structure and its applications for micro- wave circuits. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., 53 (2005), 183–190.Google Scholar
[14] Fu, Y.; Yuan, N.: Elimination of scan blindness in phased array of microstrip patches using electromagnetic bandgap materials. IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., 3 (2004), 64–65.Google Scholar
[15] Beiranvand, E.; Afsahi, M.: Improving the Bandwidth of High Gain Fabry–Perot Using FSS Substrate, in the Third Iranian Conf. on Engineering Electromagnetic (ICEEM 2014), 3–4 December 2014.Google Scholar
[16] Balanis, C.A.: Antenna Theory: Analysis and Design, 2nd ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1997, 727–736.Google Scholar
[17] Zheng, Q.R.; Fu, Y.Q.; Yuan, N.Ch.: A novel compact spiral electromagnetic band-gap structure. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 56 (6) (2008), 1656–1660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18] Sakoda, K.: Optical Properties of Photonic Crystal, 2nd ed., Springer, Berlin, 1957, 6–30.Google Scholar