Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T16:16:09.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Informal formality: tenantries, ejidos and family land

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 October 2008

Jane Matthews Glenn
Jane Matthews Glenn*
Affiliation:
Professor, Faculty of Law and School of Urban Planning, and Member, Institute of Comparative Law, McGill University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Formality and informality in housing is a continuum, rather than an either/or proposition, with many examples along the continuum. This paper focuses on three examples of housing solutions – Barbados tenantries, Mexican ejidos and Saint Lucia family land – which are situated at the fulcrum of the continuum, at the point where it tips from formality to informality, and attempts to unravel their formal and informal elements. While the starting hypothesis was that each is informal from a public law point of view but formal from a private law one, closer examination suggests that their private law aspects are more nuanced than first appeared.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Law in Context , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , June 2008 , pp. 135 - 148
Copyright
Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Appendini, K. (2001) ‘Land Regularization and Conflict Resolution: The Case of Mexico’ (document prepared for FAO, Rural Development Division, Land Tenure Service).Google Scholar
Azuela, A. (1995) ‘Ciudadanía y Gestión Urbana en los Poblados Rurales de Los Tuxtlas’, Estudios Sociológicos 13: 485–500.Google Scholar
Azuela, A. and Duhau, E. (1998) ‘Tenure Regularization, Private Property and Public Order in Mexico’ in Fernandes, E. and Varley, A. (eds) Illegal Cities: Law and Urban Change in Developing Countries. London: Zed Books, 157–171.Google Scholar
Barnes, G. (1998) ‘A Study of Land Tenure Issues in Barbados: Final Report’ (document prepared for the InterAmerican Development Bank).Google Scholar
Barnes, G. and Griffith-charles, C. (2007) ‘Assessing the Informal Market and Deformalization of Property in St. Lucia’, Land Use Policy 24: 494–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrow, C. (1992) Family Land and Development in St Lucia. Barbados: Institute of Social and Economic Research, University of the West Indies.Google Scholar
Besson, J. (1979) ‘Symbolic Aspects of Land in the Caribbean: The Tenure and Transmission of Land Rights Among Caribbean Peasantries’ in Cross, M. and Marks, A. (eds) Peasants, Plantations and Rural Communities in the Caribbean. Guildford: University of Surrey, Plantations and Rural Communities 87–116.Google Scholar
Besson, J. (1987) ‘A Paradox in Caribbean Attitudes to Land’ in Besson, J. and Momsen, J. (eds) Land and Development in the Caribbean, Warwick University Caribbean Studies. London: Macmillan, 13–45.Google Scholar
Brown, J. (2004) ‘Ejidos and Comunidades in Oaxaca, Mexico: Impact of the 1992 Reforms’, Report No 102. Seattle: Rural Development Institute.Google Scholar
Cenac, W. F. (nd) Coutume de Paris to 1988: The Evolution of Land Law in St Lucia. St Lucia: Voice Publishing.Google Scholar
Cymet, D. (1992) From Ejido to Metropolis, Another Path: An Evaluation of Ejido Property Rights and Informal Land Development in Mexico City. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Deininger, K. (2003) Land Policies for Growth and Poverty Reduction. Washington: World Bank and London/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
De soto, H. (2000) The Mystery of Capital: Why Capitalism Triumphs in the West and Fails Everywhere else. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Diego quintana, R., Concheiro bórquez, L. and Pérez aviles, R. (1998) Peasant Logic, Agrarian Policy, Land Mobility, and Land Markets in Mexico, Working Paper No 21. Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Land Tenure Center.Google Scholar
Gilbert, A. (2002) ‘On the Mystery of Capital and the Myths of Hernando de Soto: What Difference Does Legal Title Make?’ International Development Planning Review 24: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gledhill, J. (1997) ‘Fantasy and Reality in Restructuring Mexico’s Land Reform.’ Presentation to the Annual Meeting of the Society for Latin American Studies, St Andrews, Scotland, at http://jg.socialsciences.manchester.ac.uk/jgepubs.htmGoogle Scholar
Harris, J. W. (1996) Property and Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heuman, G. (1999) ‘The British West Indies’ in Porter, A. (ed.), The Nineteenth Century, The Oxford History of the British Empire, Vol. III. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 470–493.Google Scholar
Home, R. (2004) ‘Land Titling and Urban Development in Developing Countries: The Challenge of Hernando de Soto’s The Mystery of Capital’, Journal of Commonwealth Law and Legal Education 2: 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IDB [Inter-American Development Bank] (1997) ‘Profile: Barbados’, at http://www.iadb.org/exr/doc98/pro/pba0054.htmGoogle Scholar
Johnson, N. L. (2001) ‘Tierra y libertad: Will Tenure Reform Improve Productivity in Mexico’s Ejido Agriculture?’, Economic Development and Cultural Change 49(2): 291–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, G. A. (1991) ‘The Commercialisation of the Land Market? Land Ownership Patterns in the Mexican City of Puebla’, Third World Planning Review 13: 129–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, G. A. and Ward, P. M. (1998) ‘Privatizing the Commons: Reforming the Ejido and Urban Development in Mexico’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 22: 76–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, J. (2002) ‘Agrarian Change and Privatization of Ejido Land in Northern Mexico’, Journal of Agrarian Change 2: 401–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manders, J. (2004) ‘Sequencing Property Rights in the Context of Development: A Critique of the Writings of Hernando de Soto’, Cornell International Law Journal 37: 177–198.Google Scholar
Marler, W. de M. (1932) The Law of Real Property: Quebec. Toronto: Burrough & Co.Google Scholar
Matthews glenn, J. (1997) ‘Civilian Survival: Upper and Lower Canada and the Saint Lucia Civil Code’ in Mélanges Paul-André Crépeau. Cowansville, Qué: Éditions Yvon Blais, 327–354.Google Scholar
Matthews glenn, J. and Bélanger, V. (2003) ‘Informal Law in Informal Settlements’ in Holder, J. and Harrison, C. (eds) Law and Geography, Current Legal Issues, Vol. 5. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 281–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews glenn, J. and Toppin-allahar, C. (1997) ‘Chattel Houses and Mobile Homes: Fixtures in Caribbean and Canadian Law’, Caribbean Law Review 7: 368–391.Google Scholar
Matthews glenn, J. and Wolfe, J. M. (1996) ‘The Growth of the Informal Sector and Regularisation of Spontaneous Development: Lessons from the Caribbean for Planning Law Reform’, Third World Planning Review 18: 59–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard, T. (2003) ‘Barbados: Land Reform and the Search for Security of Tenure’ in Williams, A. N. (ed.) Land in the Caribbean: Issues of Policy, Administration and Management in the English-Speaking Caribbean. Wisconsin-Madison: Terra Institute, 361–380.Google Scholar
Mcintosh, S. C. R. (1996) ‘The Chattel-House Case: A Reading in Hegelian Jurisprudence’ Caribbean Law Review 6(6): 432–483.Google Scholar
Megarry, R. E. and Wade, H. W. R. (2000) The Law of Real Property, 6th edn by Harpum, C.. London: Sweet & Maxwell.Google Scholar
Melé, P (1996) ‘Action Publique et Croissance Urbaine à Puebla: Du Laissez-faire à la Maîtrise Foncière?’, Trace 29: 46–52.Google Scholar
Mohammed, A. (1989) ‘The Philosophy of Standards: Affordability–Economic Realities’ in George, V. and Wolffe, C. (eds) Development Standards for the Caribbean (proceedings of a Caribbean Regional Workshop on Development Standards) Kingston, Jamaica, 28–38.Google Scholar
Nuijten, M. (2003a) ‘Family Property and the Limits of Intervention: The Article 27 Reforms and the PROCEDE Programme in Mexico’, Development and Change 34: 475–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuijten, M. (2003b) ‘Illegal Practices and the Re-Enchantment of Governmental Techniques: Land and the Law in Mexico’, Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 48: 163–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pisa, R. A. (2002) ‘Linking Policy Objectives with Stakeholders’ Needs: The Challenges of Promoting the Mexican Agrarian Reform.’ Presentation to the World Bank.Google Scholar
Ponce de leon armenta, L. (1993) ‘Tratamiento Juriídico de la Agricultura y la Cuestión Agraria en la Etapa Virreinal y sus Implicaciones Actuales’, Revista de la Facultad de Derecho de Mexico 43: 129–143.Google Scholar
Rivera rodríguez, I. (1993) El Nuevo Derecho Agrario Mexicana. Mexico: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Sanchez noriega, M. (1994) ‘Entre la Realidad y la Ley en el Campo Mexicano’ Estudios Políticos, Quarta Epoca 3: 185–207.Google Scholar
Unruh, J. D. (2007) ‘Debates: Urbanization in the Developing World and the Acutely Tenure Insecure’, City 11(1): 115–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vargas, A. and Stanfield, D. (2003) ‘St Lucia Country Study of Land Administration and Management Issues’ in Williams, A. N. (ed.) Land in the Caribbean: Issues of Policy, Administration and Management in the English-Speaking Caribbean. Wisconsin-Madison: Terra Institute, 281–314.Google Scholar
Varley, A. (2002) ‘Private or Public: Debating the Meaning of Tenure Legalization’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 26: 449–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, M. R. and Potter, R. B. (1997) ‘Housing Conditions, Vernacular Architecture, and State Policy in Barbados’ in Potter, R. B. and Conway, D. (eds) Self-Help Housing, the Poor, and the State in the Caribbean. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 30–51.Google Scholar
Wilson, P. J. (1973) Crab Antics: The Social Anthropology of English-speaking Negro Societies of the Caribbean. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Yelvington, K. A. (2001) ‘The Anthropology of Afro-Latin America and the Caribbean: Diasporic Dimensions’, Annual Review of Anthropology 30: 227–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zamora, S., Ramón cossío, J., pereznieto, L., Roldán xopa, J. and Lopez, D. (2004) Mexican Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar