Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:29:25.529Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Anthropology on trial: exploring the laws of anthropological expertise

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 July 2016

Olaf Zenker
Olaf Zenker*
Affiliation:
Institute of Social and Cultural Anthropology, Freie Universität Berlin, Landoltweg 9–11, 14195 Berlin, Germany. E-mail: [email protected].
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper explores the role of anthropological expertise in shaping the outcome of legal proceedings under conditions of cultural diversity. Taking the state-driven land-restitution process in post-apartheid South Africa as its point of reference, the text reflects upon the work of anthropological experts in a number of cases and shows how their theoretical and political stances shaped the trajectories of their legal engagements. Pointing towards frictions that emerge in acts of translation between the seemingly objectivist rhetoric evoked in court and more relativist and subjectivist stances within the academy, the paper revisits and problematises debates around strategic essentialism. Sketching instead the contours of a ‘recursive anthropology’ that expresses itself in terms of a post-positivist universalism, the paper turns on the author's use of his own expertise in support of a White land claim, probing – and critically reflecting upon – the practical potential of a form of expertise grounded in such a recursive anthropology.

Type
Articles
Information
International Journal of Law in Context , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , September 2016 , pp. 293 - 311
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albert, Hans (1968/1985) Treatise on Critical Reason. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Berzborn, Susanne (2004) ‘Haushaltsökonomie, soziale Netzwerke und Identität: Risikominimierende Strategien von Pastoralisten und Lohnarbeitern im Richtersveld, Südafrika’. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Cologne.Google Scholar
Berzborn, Susanne (2006) Ziegen und Diamanten: Sicherung des Lebensunterhalts im ländlichen Südafrika. Berlin: LIT.Google Scholar
Berzborn, Susanne (2007) ‘Identity Politics in the Richtersveld Land Claim, South Africa’ in Bollig, Michael, Bubenzer, Olaf, Vogelsang, Ralf and Wotzka, Hans-Peter (eds) Aridity, Change and Conflict in Africa: Proceedings of an International ACACIA Conference Held at Königswinter, Germany, October 1–3, 2003. Köln: Heinrich-Barth-Institut, 295–310.Google Scholar
Boltanski, Luc (2011) On Critique: A Sociology of Emancipation. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1989) ‘Social Space and Symbolic Power’, Sociological Theory 7(1): 14–25.Google Scholar
Boynton, Graham (1997) Last Days in Cloud Cuckooland: Dispatches from White Africa. New York: Random House. Google Scholar
Clifford, James and Marcus, George E. (eds.) (1986) Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cruywagen, Dennis (2014) Brothers in War and Peace: Constand and Abraham Viljoen and the Birth of the New South Africa. Cape Town: Zebra Press.Google Scholar
De Beer, Frik C. (2003) ‘Determining the Merits of Land Claims: A Challenge for the Anthropologist’, Anthropology Southern Africa 26(3&4): 131–142.Google Scholar
De Beer, Frik C. (2006) ‘The Roots and Complexity of the Land Issue and of Land Claims in South Africa’, Anthropology Southern Africa 29(1&2): 24–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Driessen, Patrick A. (1983) ‘The Wedding of Social Science and the Courts: Is the Marriage Working?’, Social Science Quarterly 64: 476–493.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford (1983) Local Knowledge: Fact and Law in Comparative Perspective: Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. New York: Basic, 167–234.Google Scholar
Good, Anthony (2007) Anthropology and Expertise in the British Asylum Courts. London: Routledge-Cavendish.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian (1999) The Social Construction of What? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Henare, Amiria J.M., Holbraad, Martin and Wastell, Sari (2007) Thinking through Things: Theorising Artefacts Ethnographically. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Herzfeld, Michael (2010) ‘Essentialism’ in Barnard, Alan and Spencer, Jonathan (eds) The Routledge Encyclopedia of Social and Cultural Anthropology, 2nd edn. London/New York: Routledge, 234–236.Google Scholar
Holbraad, Martin (2012) Truth in Motion: The Recursive Anthropology of Cuban Divination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hymes, Dell H. (1972/1999) Reinventing Anthropology. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Johnston, Pamela Louise (1987) ‘Court-Appointed Scientific Expert Witnesses: Unfettering Expertise’, Berkeley Technology Law Journal 2(2): 249–280.Google Scholar
Jonas, Hans (1984) The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kandel, Randy F. (1992) ‘How Lawyers and Anthropologists Think Differently’ in Kandel, Randy F. (ed.) Double Vision: Anthropologists at Law. Washington: American Anthropological Association, 1–4.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kuper, Adam (2003) ‘The Return of the Native (and Comments and Reply)’, Current Anthropology 44(3): 389–402.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno (2004) ‘Why Has Critique Run Out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern’, Critical Inquiry 30(2): 225–248.Google Scholar
Low, Setha M. and Merry, Sally Engle (2010) ‘Engaged Anthropology: Diversity and Dilemmas: An Introduction to Supplement 2’, Current Anthropology 51(S2): S203–S226.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas (1991) ‘Sthenographie und Euryalistik’ in Gumbrecht, Hans Ulrich and Pfeiffer, K. Ludwig (eds) Paradoxien, Dissonanzen, Zusammenbrüche: Situationen offener Epistemologien. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 58–82.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas (1995) Social Systems. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas (2004) Law as a Social System. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, Anne (2010) ‘What's Wrong with Essentialism?’ Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory 11(1): 47–60.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl R. (1959) The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Quadri, Kafayat Motilewa, Kadaouf, Hunud Abia, Jan, Mohammad Naqib Ishan, Wahab, Mohd. Iqbal Abdul and Ahamat, Haniff (2015) ‘Adquisitorial: The Mixing of Two Legal Systems’, International Journal of Humanities and Management Sciences 3(1): 31–36.Google Scholar
Quine, William van Orman (1953) From a Logical Point of View: Nine Logico-Philosophical Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rigby, Peter and Sevareid, Peter (1992) ‘Lawyers, Anthropologists, and the Knowledge of Fact’ in Kandel, Randy F. (ed.) Double Vision: Anthropologists at Law. Washington: American Anthropological Association, 5–21.Google Scholar
Robins, Steven (2008) From Revolution to Rights in South Africa: Social Movements, NGOs & Popular Politics after Apartheid. Woodbridge/Scottsville: James Currey/University of Kwazulu-Natal Press.Google Scholar
Rottenburg, Richard (2005) ‘Code-Switching, or Why a Metacode Is Good to Have’ in Czarniawska, Barbara and Sevon, Guje (eds) Global Ideas: How Ideas, Objects and Practices Travel in the Global Economy. Malmö: Författarna och Liber AB, 259–274.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya (1985) Commodities and Capabilities. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya (1999) Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shapere, Dudley (1984) Reason and the Search for Knowledge: Investigations in the Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Slabbert, Frederik van Zyl (2006) The Other Side of History: An Anecdotal Reflection on Political Transition in South Africa. Johannesburg: Jonathan Ball Publishers.Google Scholar
Sparks, Allister Haddon (2003) Tomorrow Is Another Country: The Inside Story of South Africa's Negotiated Settlement. Johannesburg: Jonathan Ball Publishers.Google Scholar
Spiegel, Andrew D. and Becker, Heike (2015) ‘South Africa: Anthropology or Anthropologies?’, American Anthropologist 117(4): 754–760.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty (1988) In Other Worlds: Essays in Cultural Politics. New York: Methuen.Google Scholar
Thuen, Trond (2004) ‘Anthropological Knowledge in the Courtroom: Conflicting Paradigms’, Social Anthropology 12(3): 265–287.Google Scholar
Van Der Walt, Lirieka Meintjes (2006) ‘Comparative Method: Comparing Legal Systems and/or Legal Cultures?’, Speculum Juris 1: 51–64.Google Scholar
Van Dyk, Silke (2012) ‘Poststrukturalismus: Gesellschaft: Kritik: über Potenziale, Probleme und Perspektiven’, Prokla 167(2): 185–210.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1921/1978) Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Zammito, John H. (2004) A Nice Derangement of Epistemes: Post-Positivism in the Study of Science from Quine to Latour. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Zenker, Olaf (2010) ‘Language Matters: Reflexive Notes on Representing the Irish Language Revival in Catholic West Belfast’ in Zenker, Olaf and Kumoll, Karsten (eds) Beyond Writing Culture: Current Intersections of Epistemologies and Representational Practices. New York/Oxford: Berghahn Books, 121–138.Google Scholar
Zenker, Olaf (2011) ‘Autochthony, Ethnicity, Indigeneity and Nationalism: Time-Honouring and State-Oriented Modes of Rooting Individual-Territory-Group-Triads in a Globalising World’, Critique of Anthropology 31(1): 63–81.Google Scholar
Zenker, Olaf (2012) ‘The Juridification of Political Protest and the Politicisation of Legalism in South African Land Restitution’ in Eckert, Julia, Donahoe, Brian, Strümpell, Christian and Biner, Zerrin Özlem (eds) Law against the State: Ethnographic Forays into Law's Transformations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 118–146.Google Scholar
Zenker, Olaf (2013) Irish/ness Is All Around Us: Language Revivalism and the Culture of Ethnic Identity in Northern Ireland. New York/Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Zenker, Olaf (2014) ‘New Law against an Old State: Land Restitution as a Transition to Justice in Post-Apartheid South Africa?’, Development and Change 45(3): 502–523.Google Scholar
Zenker, Olaf (2015a) ‘De-Judicialization, Outsourced Review and All-Too-Flexible Bureaucracies in South African Land Restitution’, Cambridge Journal of Anthropology 33(1): 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zenker, Olaf (2015b) ‘South African Land Restitution, White Claimants and the Fateful Frontier of Former KwaNdebele’, Journal of Southern African Studies 41(5): 1019–1034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zenker, Olaf and Kumoll, Karsten (eds) (2010a) Beyond Writing Culture: Current Intersections of Epistemologies and Representational Practices. New York/Oxford: Berghahn Books. Google Scholar
Zenker, Olaf and Kumoll, Karsten (2010b) ‘Prologue: Opening Doors beyond Writing Culture’, in Zenker, Olaf and Kumoll, Karsten (eds) Beyond Writing Culture: Current Intersections of Epistemologies and Representational Practices. New York/Oxford: Berghahn Books, 1–38.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Reinhard and Visser, Daniel (1996) ‘Introduction: South African Law as a Mixed Legal System’ in Zimmermann, Reinhard and Visser, Daniel (eds) Southern Cross: Civil Law and Common Law in South Africa. Oxford/New York: Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press, 1–30.Google Scholar