Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T12:57:25.490Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Simultaneous Solution for the Masses of the Principal Planets from Analysis of Optical, Radar, and Radio Tracking Data*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

J. H. Lieske ,
W.G. Melbourne ,
D. A. O’Handley ,
D. B. Holdridge ,
D.E. Johnson  and
W.S. Sinclair
J. H. Lieske
Affiliation:
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif., U.S.A.
W.G. Melbourne
Affiliation:
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif., U.S.A.
D. A. O’Handley
Affiliation:
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif., U.S.A.
D. B. Holdridge
Affiliation:
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif., U.S.A.
D.E. Johnson
Affiliation:
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif., U.S.A.
W.S. Sinclair
Affiliation:
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif., U.S.A.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The Jet Propulsion Laboratory has developed a set of computer programs known as the Solar System Data Processing System (SSDPS) which is employed in improving the ephemerides of the major planets and for improving the values of several associated astronomical constants. A group of solutions for the masses of the major planets, together with the AU and radii of Mercury, Venus, and Mais, is presented. These solutions based upon optical, radar, and spacecraft radio tracking data are preliminary. The relative power of radar and radio tracking data vis-à-vis purely optical data in a solution is shown. The problems which could arise by adopting solutions based upon a single data type are demonstrated.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 9: The IAU System of Astronomical Constants , October 1971 , pp. 233 - 245
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1971

Footnotes

*

This paper presents the results of one phase of research carried out at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under Contract No. NAS 7-100, sponsored by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

References

Adams, A.N. and Scott, D. K.: 1964, ‘Observations of the Sun, Moon, and Planets; Six-Inch Transit Circle Results, March 8, 1963-July 2, 1964’, U.S. Naval Obs., Washington, Circular No. 105.Google Scholar
Adams, A. N. and Scott, D. K.: 1965, ‘Observations of the Sun, Moon, and Planets; Six-Inch Transit Circle Results, July 7, 1964-Dec. 24, 1964; U.S. Naval Obs., Washington, Circular No. 108.Google Scholar
Adams, A.N. and Scott, D. K.: 1967a, ‘Observations of the Sun, Moon, and Planets; Six-Inch Transit Circle Results, Jan. 11, 1965-April 11, 1966’, U.S. Naval Obs. Washington. Circular No. 115.Google Scholar
Adams, A. N. and Scott, D. K.: 1967b, ‘Observations of the Sun, Moon, and Planets; Six-Inch Transit Circle Results May 29, 1966-July 10, 1967’, U.S. Naval Obs. Washington. Circular No. 118.Google Scholar
Adams, A. N. and Scott, D. K.: 1968, Publ. U.S. Naval Obs. Washington, Second Series, Vol. 19, 333–80.Google Scholar
Adams, A.N. and Scott, D. K.: 1969, ‘Observations of the Sun, Moon, and Planets; Six-Inch Transit Circle Results, July 12, 1967-June 25, 1968’, U.S. Naval Obs. Washington Circular No. 124.Google Scholar
Adams, A. N., Bestal, S. M., and Scott, D. K.: 1964, Publ. U.S. Naval Obs., Washington, Second Series, Vol. 19, 47–110.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. D. and Efron, L.: 1969, Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 1, 231.Google Scholar
Broucke, R.: 1969, Celes. Mech. 1, 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broucke, R. and Garthwaite, K.: 1969, Celest. Mech. 1, 271.Google Scholar
Cohen, Charles J., Hubbard, Elbert C., and Oesterwinter, C.: 1967, Astron. J. 72, 973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncombe, R. L., Klepczynski, W. J., and Seidelmann, P. K.: 1968, Astron. J. 73, 830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyce, R. B. and Pettengill, G. H.: 1967, Astron. J. 72, 771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, W. J. and Brouwer, D.: 1937, Astron. J. 46, 125; errata 47, 83.Google Scholar
Eddington, A. S.: 1960, The Mathematical Theory of Relativity, Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 2nd edition, p. 93.Google Scholar
Efroymson, M. A.: 1960, ‘Multiple Regression Analysis’, Chap. 17 in Math. Methods for Digital Computers, Vol. I (ed. by Ralston, A. and Wilf, H. S.), John Wiley, N.Y., p. 191.Google Scholar
Evans, J. V. et al.: 1965, Astron. J. 70, 486.Google Scholar
Evans, J. V. et al.: 1966, Astron. J. 71, 897.Google Scholar
Goldstein, R. M.: 1968, Astron. J. 73, 829.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. C. and Watts, C. B.: 1927, Publ. U.S. Naval Obs. Washington, Second Series, Vol. 11, pp. 153–79.Google Scholar
Hanson, R. J. and Lawson, C. L.: 1969, Math. Comp. 23, 787.Google Scholar
Hartree, D. R.: 1961, Numerical Analysis, Clarendon Press, Oxford, p. 180.Google Scholar
Klock, B. L. and Scott, D. K.: 1970, ‘Observations of the Sun, Moon, and Planets; Six-Inch Transit Circle Results, June 30, 1968-July 17, 1969’, U.S. Naval Obs. Washington. Circular No. 127.Google Scholar
Melbourne, W. G.: 1970, ‘The Determination of Planetary Masses from Radio Tracking of Space Probes and Planetary Radar’ in Dynamics of Satellites (1969) (ed. by Morando, B.), Springer Verlag, Berlin, p. 63.Google Scholar
Morgan, H. R.: 1933, Publ. U. S. Naval Obs. Washington, Second Series, Vol. 13, 101–55.Google Scholar
Morgan, H. R. and Scott, F. P.: 1948, Publ. U.S. Naval Obs. Washington, Second Series, Vol. 15.Google Scholar
Muhleman, D. O. et al.: 1968, JPL Radar Range and Doppler Observations of Venus, 1961–1966, Technical Report 32–1123, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif., July 1.Google Scholar
Null, G. W.: 1969, Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 1, 356.Google Scholar
O’Handley, D. A.: 1968, Card Format for Optical and Radar Planetary Data, Technical Report 32–1296, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif.Google Scholar
O’Handley, D. A., Holdridge, D. B., Melbourne, W. G., and Mulholland, J. D.: 1969, JPL Development Ephemeris 69, Technical Report 32–1465, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif.Google Scholar
Pettengill, G. H., Dyce, R. B., and Campbell, D. B.: 1967, Astron. J. 72, 330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettengill, G.H. et al.: 1969, Astron. J. 74, 461.Google Scholar
Private Communication: 1967, Millstone and Haystack Observatories, ‘1967 Venus Observations’, Smith, W., Lincoln Laboratory with Melbourne, W. G., JPL, October.Google Scholar
Private Communication: 1968, Haystack Observatory, ‘1967–1968 Mercury Observations’, Shapiro, I.I., MIT with O’Handley, D. A., JPL, October 28.Google Scholar
Robertson, H. P.: 1962, Space Age Astronomy (ed. by Deutsch, A. J. and Klemperer, W. E.), Academic Press, N.Y., p. 228.Google Scholar
Tausworthe, R. C.: 1967, ‘Ranging the 1967 Mariner to Venus’, Paper No. 36.4, 1967, IEEE International Conf. Record, New York, March 20–23.Google Scholar
Watts, C. B. and Adams, A. N.: 1949, Publ. U.S. Naval Obs. Washington, Second Series, Vol. 16, 59–203.Google Scholar
Watts, C.B., Scott, F. P., and Adams, A.N.: 1952, Publ. U.S. Naval Obs. Washington, Second Series, Vol. 16, 395–445.Google Scholar