Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T17:40:45.147Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Planetary Theories in Sanskrit Astronomical Texts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

S.N. Sen
S.N. Sen*
Affiliation:
The Asiatic Society, 1 Park Street, Calcutta, India

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The origin and development of planetary theories in India are still imperfectly understood. It is generally believed that fullfledged planetary theories capable of predicting the true positions of the Sun, Moon and Star-planets appeared in India along with the emergence of the siddhāntic astronomical literature. Before this siddhāntic astronomy there had existed the Vedāṅga Jyotiṣa of Lagadha, prepared around circa 400 B.C. in the Sūtra period more or less on the basis of astronomical elements developed in the time of the Saṃhitās and the Brāhmaṇas. This Jyotiṣa propounded a luni-solar calendar based on a five-year period or yuga in which the Sun made 5 complete revolutions. Moreover, this quinquennial cycle contained 67 sidereal and 62 synodic revolutions of the Moon, 1830 sāvana or civil days, 1835 sidereal days, 1800 solar days and 1860 lunar days. An important feature of the Jyotiṣa is its concept of the lunar day or tithi which is a thirtieth part of the synodic month. The tithi concept was also used in Babylonian astronomy of the Seleucid period. To trace the motion of the Sun and the Moon and to locate the positions of fullmoons and newmoons in the sky a stellar zodiac or a nakṣatra system coming down from the times of the Saṃhitās and the Brāhmaṇas was used. The Jyotiṣa was acquainted with the solstices and equinoxes, the variation in day-length of which a correct ratio was given. It is, however, silent about the inclination of the ecliptic, the non-uniform and irregular motion of the Sun and the Moon and various other important elements.

Type
Ancient Elements and Planetary Models
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 91: History of Oriental Astronomy , 1987 , pp. 113 - 124
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

References

Āryabhatīya, , edited by H.Kern, , 1874; English translation by Clark, W.E., 1930; edited by Sarma, K.V. and Shukla, K.S. with English translation by Shukla, K.S., (1976), Indian National Science Academy, New Delhi.Google Scholar
Bhattacharyya, S.P., and Sen, S.N., (1969), Ahargana in Hindu astronomy, Indian Journal of History of Science, 4, Nos.1 and 2, 144–155.Google Scholar
Candraprajn&bar;aptisūtra, edited with text in Hindi, Amolakrisi, Hyderabad, Vikramsamvat, 2445; see Kapadia, H.L., Indian Historical Quarterly,8, 1932 pp. 381–82; Das, S.R., Indian Historical Quarterly, 8, 1932.pp.36ff.Google Scholar
Neugebauer, O.(1952). The Exact Sciences in Antiquity, pp.123, 178, Capenhagen.Google Scholar
Neugebauer, O.(1955). Astronomical Cuneiform Texts, 1, p.40.Google Scholar
Neugebauer, O.(1956), Transmission of planetary theories in ancient and medieval astronomy, Scripta Mathematica, 22, 174, pp.Google Scholar
Pañcasiddhāntika, edited by Dvivedi, S. and Thibaut, G., 1889; edited by Neugebauer, O. and Pingree, D., with English translation and notes, 1970-71.Google Scholar
Pañcasiddhāntikā I, 15; the numbering of the verse is from notes, 1970-71.Google Scholar
Sūryaprajñapti, edited with the commentary of Malayagiri, Agamadaya Samiti, 1918. See Thibaut, G., Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, 49, 1880, pp.107–127, 181-206.Google Scholar
Vedāṅga Jyotiṣa, , with Somākara’s commentary, edited by Sudhākara Dvivedi, , 1908; also edited with his own Sanskrit commentary and English translation by Shamasastry, R., 1936.Google Scholar
Waerden, B.L. Van der (1980). The Conjunction of 3102 B.C.; Centaurus, 24, 117–131.Google Scholar