Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T02:00:22.184Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Orbital Distribution and Origin of Meteoroids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

Duncan Steel*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Mathematical PhysicsThe University of AdelaideG.P.O. Box 498, Adelaide, SA 5001Australia

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Approximately 68,000 orbits of meteoroids, ranging from sizes of 10 cm and more down to microgram masses, are now available through the IAU Meteor Data Center. These orbits were measured in surveys based in the U.S.S.R., the U.S.A., Canada, Somalia, and Australia, using photographic, radar and television techniques; the data represent our best knowledge of the orbital distributions of smaller solid bodies in the solar system. It is found that quite different distributions result in different mass regimes, with implications for the origin and evolution of these particles: for example the larger bodies, observed as fireballs, are associated with meteorites in coming from the region of the asteroid belt with low-inclination orbits, whereas the smaller meteoroids have more comet-like orbits. There is also evidence for several meteoroid streams associated with specific Apollo asteroids. The data may additionally be viewed as a suitable source function in investigations of the production of interplanetary dust from the fragmentation of larger meteoroids in mutual collisions. However, inspection of the data raises many questions: for instance there seem to be many meteoroids on small retrograde paths, but no possible parent objects are known to exist on such orbits.

Type
Meteoroids and Meteor Streams
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1991

References

Grun, E., Zook, H.A., Fechtig, H. and Giese, R.H. (1985). ‘Collisional balance of the meteoroitic complex’, Icarus, 62, 244272.Google Scholar
Jones, J. and Sarma, T. (1985). ‘Double-station observations of 454 TV meteors. II. Orbits’, Bull. Astron. Inst. Czechoslov., 36, 103115.Google Scholar
Hawkes, R.L. and Jones, J. (1988). ‘Electro-optical meteor observation techniques and results’, Q. Jl. Roy. Astron. Soc., 27, 569589.Google Scholar
Kneissel, B. and Giese, R.H. (1987). ‘The dynamics of the zodiacal dust cloud on account of optical and infrared observations’, Publ. Astron. Inst. Czechoslov. Acad. Sci., No. 67, vol. 2, 241243.Google Scholar
Lebedinets, V.N., Korpusov, V.N. and Manokhina, A.V. (1981, 1982), ‘Radio Meteor Investigations in Obninsk: Catalogue of Orbits’, Materials of the World Data Center B, Moscow, U.S.S.R. Google Scholar
Lindblad, B.-A. (1987). ‘The IAU Meteor Data Centre in Lund’, Publ. Astron. Inst. Czechoslov. Acad. Sci., No. 67, vol. 2, 201204.Google Scholar
Olsson-Steel, D. (1988). ‘Identification of meteoroid streams associated with Apollo asteroids in the Adelaide radar orbit surveys’, Icarus, 75, 6496.Google Scholar
Sekanina, Z. (1976). ‘Statistical model of meteor streams. IV. A study of radio streams from the synoptic year’, Icarus, 27, 265321.Google Scholar
Steel, D.I. and Baggaley, W.J. (1985). ‘Meteoroid orbits determined by southern hemisphere radar’, in Properties and Interactions of Interplanetary Dust, IAU Colloquium No. 85 (eds. Giese, R.H. and Lamy, Ph.), D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland, 299303.Google Scholar
Steel, D.I. and Lindblad, B.-A. (1991). ‘The meteor orbit database’, Space Science Rev. (submitted).Google Scholar