Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T03:55:42.911Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Linear and Nonlinear Study of Mira

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

A.N. Cox
Affiliation:
Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory
D. A. Ostlie
Affiliation:
Weber State University

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Both linear and nonlinear calculations of the 331 day, long period variable star Mira have been undertaken to see what radial pulsation mode is naturally selected. Models are similar to those considered in the linear nonadiabatic stellar pulsation study of Ostlie and Cox (1986). Models are considered with masses near one solar mass, luminosities between 4000 and 5000 solar luminosities, and effective temperatures of approximately 3000 K. These models have fundamental mode periods that closely match the pulsation period of Mira. The equation of state for the stellar material is given by the Stellingwerf (1975ab) procedure, and the opacity is obtained from a fit by Cahn that matches the low temperature molecular absorption data for the Population I Ross-Aller 1 mixture calculated from the Los Alamos Astrophysical Opacity Library. For the linear study, the Cox, Brownlee, and Eilers (1966) approximation is used for the linear theory variation of the convection luminosity. For the nonlinear work, the method described by Ostlie (1990) and Cox (1990) is followed. Results showing internal details of the radial fundamental and first overtone modes behavior in linear theory are presented. Preliminary radial fundamental mode nonlinear calculations are discussed. The very tentative conclusion is that neither the fundamental or first overtone mode is excluded from being the actual observed one.

Type
III. Models
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1993

References

Beach, T.E.: 1990, thesis, Iowa State University.Google Scholar
Bowen, G.H.: 1988, Astrophysical Journal 329, 299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, A.N.: 1990, Proceedings of the Ninth Florida Workshop in Nonlinear Astronomy.Google Scholar
Cox, A.N., Brownlee, R.R. and Eilers, D.D.: 1966, Astrophysical Journal 144, 1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostlie, D.A.: 1990, Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Research Workshop on The Numerical Modelling of Nonlinear Stellar Pulsations: Problems and Prospects, ed. Buchler, J.R. (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht), p. 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostlie, D.A. and Cox, A.N., 1986, Astrophysical Journal 311, 864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perl, M. and Tuchman, Y.: 1990, Astrophysical Journal 360, 554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stellingwerf, R.F.: 1975a, Astrophysical Journal 195, 441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stellingwerf, R.F.: 1975b, Astrophysical Journal 199, 705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuchman, Y., Sack, N., and Barkat, Z.: 1978, Astrophysical Journal 219, 183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuchman, Y., Sack, N., and Barkat, Z.: 1979, Astrophysical Journal 234, 217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuchman, Y., 1991, Astrophysical Journal 383, 779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar