Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T15:57:16.472Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introductory Comments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

William P. Bidelman
William P. Bidelman*
Affiliation:
Warner & Swasey ObservatoryCase Western Reserve UniversityCleveland, OH 44106USA

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The chairman has kindly encouraged, not to say entreated, me to write a few remarks concerning the subject of your symposium, which I was unfortunately unable to attend. This I am happy to do: the hydrogen-deficient stars are dear to my heart and even though I haven’t contributed anything to the subject for several years, it is certainly nice to be remembered. From an outsider, then, a few thoughts.

To quote from Miss Payne, in her classical study of 1925: The uniformity of composition of stellar atmospheres appears to be an established fact.” Certainly for the time that statement was beyond reproach. Yet even then the seeds of hydrogen deficiency had already been sown. Mrs. Fleming, in noting the presence of bright Hβ in u Sagittarii, in 1891, further states that its spectrum “is remarkable, since the hydrogen lines are very faint and of the same intensity as the additional dark lines.” Further, Ludendorff, in a paper written on Aug. 16, 1906, discovered the complete absence of the Hγ line in R Coronae Borealis (a similar situation with respect to Hβ and Hδ being confirmed by Frost). And by a remarkable coincidence, a Harvard objective-prism plate taken the very same day was described by Miss Cannon as showing very little absorption at the G band. Both HD 30353 and RY Sagittarii are stated in the Henry Draper Catalogue to show a spectral resemblance to R CrB. And finally, the non-typical weakness of the G band of the carbon star HD 182040 was pointed out by Rufus as early as 1923.

Type
I. Introduction
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 87: Hydrogen Deficient Stars and Related Objects , 1985 , pp. 3 - 5
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1986

References

Berman, L. 1935, Astrophys. J. 81, 369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bidelman, W.P. 1979, in IAU Symposium no. 83, Mass Loss and Evolution of O-type Stars, Conti, P.S. and de Loore, C.W.H., eds., p. 305.Google Scholar
Cannon, A.J. 1912, Harvard Ann. 56, p. 107.Google Scholar
Fleming, W.P. 1891, Astron. Nach. 126, 165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenstein, J.L. 1940, Astrophys. J., 91, 438.Google Scholar
Joy, A.H. and Humason, M.L. 1923, Publs. Astron. Soc. Pacific 35, 327.Google Scholar
Ludendorff, H. 1906, Astron. Nach. 173, 3.Google Scholar
Payne, C.H. 1925, Stellar Atmospheres (Cambridge, Mass.: the Observatory), p. 189.Google Scholar
Payne, C.H. 1930, The Stars of High Luminosity (New York: McGraw-Hill), p. 146.Google Scholar
Plaskett, J.S. 1927, Publ. Dom. Astrophys. Obs. 4, p. 1.Google Scholar
Rufus, W.C. 1923, Pub. Obs. Michigan 3, p. 260.Google Scholar
Russell, H.N. 1933, Astrophys. J. 78, 296.Google Scholar
Struve, O., and Sherman, F. 1940, Astrophys. J. 91, 428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar