Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:52:00.516Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comments on the Effect of Adopting New Precession and Equinox Corrections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

J. G. Williams  and
W. G. Melbourne
J. G. Williams
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California, 91109USA
W. G. Melbourne
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California, 91109USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The new astronomical constants being introduced for 1984 affect the derived values of UT1 and terrestrial longitudes differently for the space techniques than for the optical techniques. The new sidereal time equation has been defined to avoid a discontinuity in UT1 as obtained by the established techniques. However, this definition does introduce a discontinuity in both the terrestrial longitude system and the UT1 rate derived by the space techniques which have an inertial celestial reference frame rather than a stellar catalog frame. The use of consistent expressions for precession and Greenwich Mean Sidereal Time will not eliminate differences between the inertial and classical optical techniques. Only improvements in the accuracy of the precession constant and equinox offset and drift will bring about consistency. Improvements in the precession constant can be expected in the next few years. The inertial techniques will exhibit shifts in the derived UT1 rate and terrestrial longitude system with each change in the precession constant if Greenwich Mean Sidereal Time is referenced to the mean equinox of date, as is the present practice, but would be stable if the reference is a fixed equinox. The latter choice is recommended.

Type
Part IV
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 63: High-Precision Earth Rotation and Earth-Moon Dynamics , May 1981 , pp. 293 - 303
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1982

References

Bretagnon, P. and Chapront, J.: 1981, in press.Google Scholar
Fricke, W.: 1977, Astron. Astrophys. 54, 363.Google Scholar
Fricke, W.: 1981, Astron. Astrophys., in press.Google Scholar
Gninot, B.: 1979, in Time and the Earth’s Rotation, Eds. McCarthy, D.D. and Pilkington, J.D., Reidel (Dordrecht), 7.Google Scholar
Lieske, J.H., Lederle, T., Fricke, W., Morando, W.: 1977, Astron. Astrophys. 58, 1.Google Scholar