Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:11:29.549Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Asteroid Masses and Densities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

Joachim Schubart
Joachim Schubart*
Affiliation:
Astronomisches Rechen-lnstitut, Heidelberg

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Before 1966, when Hertz (1966) published his first direct determination of the mass of Vesta, all our knowledge on asteroid masses was based on estimates. The masses of the first four minor planets resulted from the measured diameters by Barnard (1900) (see the paper by Dollfus in this volume) and from estimated mean densities. The diameters of the smaller objects were derived from their brightness and an estimate of their reflectivity (usually the reflectivity of the Moon was adopted). In 1901, Bauschinger and Neugebauer (1901) derived a value for the total mass of the first 458 asteroids. All the diameters were computed from the brightness with an assumed value for the reflectivity. The diameter of Ceres found in this way is very close to Barnard’s (1900) value. The mean density of the 458 asteroids was put equal to that of Earth, and their total mass resulted as 3 X 10-9 solar mass. Stracke (1942) used the same method with an increased material, but the addition of more than 1000 faint asteroids did not bring a significant change in the estimate of the total mass. The report on the McDonald asteroid survey (Kuiper et al., 1958) does not contain another estimate of the total mass of the asteroid ring, but it points to the possibility of a very rapid increase in the number of asteroids with decreasing absolute brightness. If this increase is strong enough, each interval of 1 mag in absolute magnitude can contribute the same amount to the total mass. In the range of magnitudes covered by the Palomar-Leiden survey (PLS) (van Houten et al., 1970), there are no indications for such a strong increase.

Type
Part I-Observations
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 12: Physical Studies of Minor Planets , 1971 , pp. 33 - 39
Copyright
Copyright © NASA 1971

References

References

Allen, C. W. 1963, Astrophysical Quantities, pp. 152–153. Second ed. Athlone Press. London.Google Scholar
Anders, E. 1964, Origin, Age, and Composition of Meteorites. Space Sei. Rev. 3,583–714.Google Scholar
Barnard, E.E. 1900, The Diameter of the Asteroid Juno (3), Determined With the Micrometer of the 40-Inch Refractor of the Yerkes Observatory, With Remarks on Some of the Other Asteroids. Mon. Notie. Roy. Astron. Soc. 61(2), 68–69.Google Scholar
Bauschinger, J., and Neugebauer, P. V. 1901, Tabellen zur Geschichte und Statistik der kleinen Planeten. Königl. Astron. Rechen-Inst. Berlin, Veröffentlichungen 16, 1–77.Google Scholar
Brunn, A. von. 1910, Über die Masse des Planetoidenringes. Sehr. Naturforschenden Gesellschaft Danzig, Neue Folge 12(4), 101–148.Google Scholar
Dohnanyi, J. S. 1968, Collisional Model of Asteroids and Their Debris. Physics and Dynamics of Meteors, LAU Symp. 33, pp. 486–503. D. Reidel. Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Dohnanyi, J. S. 1969, Collisional Model of Asteroids and Their Debris. J. Geophys. Res. 74(10), 2531–2554.Google Scholar
Dollfus, A. 1970, Diamètres des Planètes et Satellites. Surfaces and Interiors of Planets and Satellites (ed., Dollfus, A.), pp. 45–139. Academic Press, Inc. London and New York.Google Scholar
Duncombe, R. L. 1969, Heliocentric Coordinates of Ceres, Pallas, Juno, Vesta 1928–2000. Nautical Almanac Office, U.S. Naval Observatory, Washington, D.C., Astron. Papers 20(2), 133–309.Google Scholar
Gehreis, T. 1970, Photometry of Asteroids. Surfaces and Interiors of Planets and Satellites (ed., Dollfus, A. ), pp. 317–375. Academic Press, Inc. London and New York.Google Scholar
Gehrels, T., Roemer, E., Taylor, R. C., and Zellner, B. H. 1970, Minor Planets and Related Objects. IV. Asteroid (1566) Icarus. Astron. J. 75, 186–195.Google Scholar
Hertz, H. G. 1966, The Mass of Vesta. IAU Central Bureau for Astron. Telegrams, Circ. 1983.Google Scholar
Hertz, H. G. 1968, Mass of Vesta. Science 160, 299–300.Google Scholar
Houten, C. J. van, Houten-Groeneveld, I. van, Herget, P., and Gehrels, T. 1970, The Palomar-Leiden Survey of Faint Minor Planets. Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. 2, 339–448.Google Scholar
Kuiper, G. P. 1950, On the Origin of Asteroids. Astron. J. 55, 164.Google Scholar
Kuiper, G. P., Fujita, Y., Gehrels, T., Groeneveld, I., Kent, J., Van Biesbroeck, G., and Houten, C. J. van. 1958, Survey of Asteroids. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 3, 289–428.Google Scholar
Leveau, G. 1896, Positions Normales de Vesta Employees dans la Comparaison de la Theorie Avec les Observations (Appendix). Ann. Observ. Paris Mem. 22, A315–A317.Google Scholar
Leveau, G. 1910, Observations Méridiennes de Vesta Faites de 1890 a 1904 et Comparaison Avec les Tables (Appendix). Ann. Observ. Paris Mem. 27, B41–B43.Google Scholar
Schubart, J. 1970a, The Mass of Ceres. IAU Central Bureau for Astron. Telegrams, Circ. 2268.Google Scholar
Schubart, J. 1970b, The Planetary Masses and the Orbits of the First Four Minor Planets. Paper presented at IAU Colloquium no. 9. (1971, Celest. Mech., to be published.)Google Scholar
Schubart, J., and Stumpff, P. 1966, On an N-Body Program of High Accuracy for the Computation of Ephemerides of Minor Planets and Comets. Astron. Rechen-Inst. Heidelberg, Veröff. 18, 1–31.Google Scholar
Stracke, G. 1942, Über die geometrischen Grössen und die Masse der kleinen Planeten. Astron. Nachr. 273, 24–28.Google Scholar
Struve, G. 1911, Die Darstellung der Pallasbahn durch die Gauss'sche Theorie für den Zeitraum 1803 bis 1910. Doctoral Dissertation. Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität zu Berlin.Google Scholar
Zach, F. X. von. 1874, Carl Friedrich Gauss Werke, vol. 6, pp. 215–216. Königl. Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen.Google Scholar

Discussion References

Brunn, A. von. 1910, Über die Masse des Planetoidenringes. Sehr. Naturforschenden Gesellschaft Danzig, Neue Folge 12(4), 101–148.Google Scholar
Gehrels, T., Roemer, . Taylor, R. C, and Zellner, B. H. 1970, Minor Planets and Related Objects. rV. Asteroid (1566) Icarus. Astron. J. 75, 186–195.Google Scholar
Schubart, J. 1970. The Planetary Masses and the Orbits of the First Four Minor Planets. Paper presented at IAU Colloquium no. 9. (1971, Celest. Mech., to be published.)Google Scholar