Background: Candidiasis caused by Candida auris is one of the most serious hospital-acquired infection. Initially, Candida auris was reported to cause local infections; later, invasive candidasis was also reported in which the bloodstream, the central nervous system, kidneys, liver eyes, etc, are invaded. In this study, we evaluated the clinical epidemiology and risk factors in patients hospitalized to trauma center. Methods: This study was conducted at JPN Apex Trauma Centre of All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, which is a 169-bed hospital. All patients who were identified to have candidemia due to C. auris over a period of 5 years from January 2012 to December 2016 were included. Blood samples were collected in BAC-T-Alert bottles (Bio Merieux, Durham, NC) and isolates were identified up to the species level by the VITEK 2 (version 8.01, BioMerieux). Conventional identification was performed by observing color development on CHROMagar (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ). The demographic and clinical data of patients were collected from the hospital information system. Results: Over a period of 5 years, 20 patients admitted to our trauma hospital developed candidemia due to Candida auris. Among them, men were predominant (95%), and the mean (SD) age of the patients was 33 (+15) years. Among these patients, 80% were in hospitalized and 20% were follow-up patients. The median of the total length of stay in the hospital was 34 days (range, 7–122). All of the patients were on mechanical ventilation; 65% patients were catheterized and 75% patients had central line placed. Head injury was the major cause of trauma followed by abdomen, chest, and spine. The overall mortality rate was 40%. Most of the patients (65%) who developed Candida auris infection were immunocompromised. The different comorbidities present were hypertension (35%), diabetes (15%), renal disease (10%), and hepatitis C (5%). Broad-spectrum antibiotics were given: amoxicillin-clavulanate was given to 65% of patients; cefoperazone sulbactam was given to 30% of patients; chloroamphenicol, amicillin-sulbactam, or clindamycin was given to 10% of patients. Antifungal agents like fluconazole or caspofungin were given to 5% of patients. Major surgeries like cranioplasty were performed in 58% of patients. Pancreatectomy, laparotomy, and endoscopic necrosectomy were performed in 42% of patients. Conclusions:Candida auris is one of the dreaded and most commonly spread hospital-acquired fungal infections, especially in immunocompromised patients. Broad-spectrum antibiotics use, major surgery, and invasive devices were the most common risk factors for acquiring Candida auris infection.

Funding: None

Disclosures: None

Background: As more US hospitals report antibiotic utilization to the CDC, standardized antimicrobial administration ratios (SAARs) derived from patient care unit-based antibiotic utilization data will increasingly be used to guide local antibiotic stewardship interventions. Location-based antibiotic utilization surveillance data are often utilized given the relative ease of ascertainment. However, aggregating antibiotic use data on a unit basis may have variable effects depending on the number of clinical teams providing care. In this study, we examined antibiotic utilization from units at a tertiary-care hospital to illustrate the potential challenges of using unit-based antibiotic utilization to change individual prescribing. Methods: We used inpatient pharmacy antibiotic use administration records at an adult tertiary-care academic medical center over a 6-month period from January 2019 through June 2019 to describe the geographic footprints and AU of medical, surgical, and critical care teams. All teams accounting for at least 1 patient day present on each unit during the study period were included in the analysis, as were all teams prescribing at least 1 antibiotic day of therapy (DOT). Results: The study population consisted of 24 units: 6 ICUs (25%) and 18 non-ICUs (75%). Over the study period, the average numbers of teams caring for patients in ICU and non-ICU wards were 10.2 (range, 3.2–16.9) and 13.7 (range, 10.4–18.9), respectively. Units were divided into 3 categories by the number of teams, accounting for ≥70% of total patient days present (Fig. 1): “homogenous” (≤3), “pauciteam” (4–7 teams), and “heterogeneous” (>7 teams). In total, 12 (50%) units were “pauciteam”; 7 (29%) were “homogeneous”; and 5 (21%) were “heterogeneous.” Units could also be classified as “homogenous,” “pauciteam,” or “heterogeneous” based on team-level antibiotic utilization or DOT for specific antibiotics. Different patterns emerged based on antibiotic restriction status. Classifying units based on vancomycin DOT (unrestricted) exhibited fewer “heterogeneous” units, whereas using meropenem DOT (restricted) revealed no “heterogeneous” units. Furthermore, the average number of units where individual clinical teams prescribed an antibiotic varied widely (range, 1.4–12.3 units per team). Conclusions: Unit-based antibiotic utilization data may encounter limitations in affecting prescriber behavior, particularly on units where a large number of clinical teams contribute to antibiotic utilization. Additionally, some services prescribing antibiotics across many hospital units may be minimally influenced by unit-level data. Team-based antibiotic utilization may allow for a more targeted metric to drive individual team prescribing.

Funding: None

Disclosures: None

Background: In January 2019, our large academic medical center implemented hard stops for ordering Clostridiodes difficile nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT), and required a discussion with an infectious diseases physician if the order was placed in a clinical scenario not consistent with the 2017 IDSA/SHEA C. difficile infection (CDI) testing guidelines. Recently, some groups have expressed concerns that requiring the discontinuation of laxatives may delay the diagnosis of CDI and result in serious adverse outcomes. Methods:C. difficile testing stewardship interventions were performed at 2 hospitals within the same university health system to reduce inappropriate testing. In January 2019, a best practice advisory (BPA) was implemented to alert providers ordering C. difficile NAAT if patients had received laxatives within 24 hours, requiring a discussion with the ID physician to override the hard stop. We reviewed clinical outcomes of patients who had a BPA alert due to laxative use within the past 24 hours April 23 to October 23, 2019. Results: During the study period, there were 235 patients with a BPA because of laxative use within the past 24 hours. Moreover, 55 (23.4%) continued to experience diarrhea after the discontinuation of laxatives and were retested for CDI within 7 days. Only 8 tests returned positive, suggesting that, at most, 3.4% of cases had delayed diagnoses because of the hard stop. This finding is supported by the increase in the percentage of tests positive from 11.6% observed overall to 14.6% (8 of 55) after this intervention. There were no severe CDI cases (ICU admission, colectomy, or death) among patients who had delayed testing due to laxative use. Conclusions: In the setting of laxative use, C. difficile testing stewardship interventions with C. difficile NAAT using a hard-stop BPA are effective in reducing unnecessary testing and safe if they are used in combination with a real-time expert input of the risk of clinical disease.

Funding: None

Disclosures: None

Background: Unnecessary testing for Clostridioides difficile can lead facilities to overreport laboratory-identified (LabID) events. Because false-positive LabID tests could dilute infection control resources, we developed best practice alerts (BPAs) in the electronic health record, educational materials as well as a follow-up system to help reduce unnecessary testing and, therefore, reduce false-positive results. Methods: Three BPAs were initiated in late August, 2018. Alerts fired when clinicians tried to order repeat C. difficile testing after a positive result, testing within 24 hours of laxative administration and to order a multiplex PCR panel for GI pathogens >48 hours after admission. The GI multiplex PCR test consists of 21 targets, including C. difficile, but it allows for testing solid stool. All alerts gave suggestions for how to proceed (ie, not test for cure from previous positive, wait until laxatives wear off, or call for approval before GI panel) but could be bypassed by clinicians. Educational emails and signage were distributed to all house staff and clinicians in all clinical areas at the start of the program. For each bypassed BPA, infection control physicians contacted the ordering clinician by email or phone to explain why testing was not advised. Results: Between September 5, 2018, and April 23, 2019, 1,217 BPAs were issued: 634 in first half and 583 in the second half. Of these, 268 (22%) were bypassed by clinicians (Fig. 1). There was no significant decrease in bypassing BPAs. In the first half of the intervention, 22% of BPAs were bypassed (141 of 634). In the second 4 months, 22% of BPAS were still bypassed (127 of 583; P = .85). Of the 40 ordering services, 8 had no bypassed BPAs in the first half and 9 had no bypassed BPAs in the second half. Conclusions: Educating providers and following up after bypassed BPAs did not decrease the number of bypassed BPAs. Although fewer BPAs were issued in the second half of the intervention, more analysis is needed to understand whether this decrease is significant. In this study, 268 unnecessary C. difficile tests were ordered over 8 months.

Funding: None

Disclosures: None

Background: The optimal prevention of healthcare onset Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) has been a challenging one in an acute tertiary-care hospital with limited number of single rooms. Asymptomatic patients with CDI are nursed in open wards but tagged with a green sticker to alert staff of their status. This signal prompts cleaning staff to use 5,000 ppm sodium hypochlorite to clean environmental surfaces in the multibed room and to continue with modified contact precautions. Methods: We conducted a survey on infection prevention measures used in the management of CDI patients over 2 weeks among senior nurse managers, clinicians, and registered nurses in 38 inpatient wards. We categorized the survey results into 4 types of practices: established practices, nonestablished practices (easy implementation), nonestablished practices (lack of resources), and nonestablished practices (staff resistance). We then identified barriers to determine reasons for resistance to nonestablished practices before the implementation of the CDI bundle in May 2019. The bundle comprised the following components: contact precautions, antimicrobial stewardship, isolation of CDI patient with diarrhea in single room, environment, and equipment hygiene. Following the survey, we enhanced the signage for CDI patients to be more obvious. Monthly, we monitored the incidence of HO-Clostridium difficile to assess effectiveness of implementation measures. Results: Nonestablished practices (easy implementation) included uncertainty of diarrhea definition and the recommended environmental hygiene disinfectant, lack of understanding of the importance of complying to personal protective equipment (PPE), and inconsistency in conveying CDI status. Among nonestablished practices (lack of resources), shortage of isolation beds for CDI patients with diarrhea and unavailability of electronic alert system for CDI patients within the institution are the major issues faced by clinical staff. Unavailability of CDI indicator stickers, contact precaution posters, and sporicidal wipes were noted in 6 medical and surgical wards. Nonestablished practices (staff resistance) were related to the time taken to don full PPE and reluctance to arrange for an isolation bed due to increased workload and unavailability of isolation beds. A shift was noted in the control chart for HO-Clostridium difficile after the implementation of the CDI bundle in May 2019. Conclusions: The categorization of practices into established and nonestablished practices can help to identify barriers that may interfere with successful implementation of an infection prevention bundle.

Funding: None

Disclosures: None

Background: The unapproved and unregulated use of umbilical stem-cell products has been identified as a possible source of adverse events and infection. In 2018, a national outbreak of multiple bacterial infections was associated with use of umbilical stem cells products. From December 2018 through March 2019, the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health (LACDPH) identified 4 cases of bacterial infection in patients that had received therapies using umbilical stem-cell products. Although 2 cases were associated with the national outbreak of a single company’s product, 2 additional cases of Enterobacter cloacae were instead associated with a second stem-cell distributer. Methods: In December 2018, LACDPH staff received notification from a hospital infectious disease physician of 2 cases of E. cloacae infection in patients of a freestanding ambulatory surgery center following allogenic umbilical cord stem-cell injections on the same day in August 2018. LACDPH reviewed the medical records of these patients and conducted an on-site visit to the ambulatory surgery center, which included observation of infection prevention practices, interview of staff, and review of logs. The 2 isolates from each patient were sent to the CDC laboratory for relatedness testing. Results: The 2 case patients received products via intra-articular injection from different lot and donor numbers for lumbar spine pain. In addition to the stem-cell product, both patients also received antibiotics and pain medications during their procedures, though from different vials. Both patients were seen by the same surgeon, anesthesiologist, and nurse during their procedures. No additional cases occurred. The case patients were hospitalized for 12 and 27 days, respectively. Whole-genome sequencing indicated that the isolates from the 2 patients were related. No major gaps in infection prevention practices were identified at the surgery center. Conclusion: This report describes a cluster of 2 E. cloacae infections in patients who had received unapproved-use stem-cell products via spinal injection. Given molecular laboratory results and infection prevention observations, we hypothesize that the stem-cell products used on these 2 cases were likely contaminated before distribution. This cluster demonstrates that contamination of stem-cell products extends beyond the single outbreak previously described and points to the systematic inability to ensure the safety of unapproved use of umbilical stem- cell products.

Funding: None

Disclosures: None

Background: Reporting nosocomial surveillance data can be difficult because the quantity of statistics, graphics, tables, and numeric data may confuse people. Another issue related to feedback regarding healthcare infections rate is that gaps exist between collecting data, the analysis, and implementation of actions based on the information produced. Even when a statistical process control chart (SPC) is used, it is interpreted retrospectively. Here, we present 3 epidemiological tools: (1) a cobweb chart for infection rates, (2) the infectometer, and (3) an outbreak alert system. Methods: For the cobweb chart, the first step is to choose how many and which infection rates will be summarized. Thereafter, all infection rates, respective benchmarks, endemic level, and actual values are placed in a spreadsheet. Although each infection rate has different units (eg, %, rates per 100 discharges, and/or rates per 1,000 denominator days), when we compare the respective endemic level and actual rate with the benchmark, dimensionless quantities are generated for each indicator, making it possible to build the cobweb graph. Using the infectometer for calculations, we (1) built an SPC chart for each infection or microorganism; (2) estimated the average month and standard deviation of the infection cases, excluding outlier data, and (3) calculated the monthly expected incidence, assuming that nosocomial infection occurrence follows a normal distribution. If the supposition of normal distribution fails, a percentile method is used. The outbreak alert system predicts outbreaks using the infectometer parameters, the last month’s observed infection cases, and a Poisson model for predicting the chance of new cases of each infection above monthly expected incidence. Results: With the adapted radar chart, we can report many infection rates in only 1 chart (Fig. 1). The SPC charts for infection rates, stratified by all the types of healthcare infections or by microorganism, can be built, and the infectometer can then be produced, showing weekly and monthly expected cases of an endemic condition. The outbreak alert system is presented as a speedometer that is analyzed at the beginning of each month (Fig. 2). Conclusions: The idea behind the cobweb chart for infection rate method is to report all infection rates in only 1 graph. With the infectometer, it is not necessary to wait until the end of the month to analyze the surveillance data; the analysis becomes prospective and timely. The outbreak alert system brings the future to the present, showing the risk of an outbreak.

Funding: None

Disclosures: None

Background: Long-term acute-care hospitals (LTACHs) are disproportionately burdened by multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) like KPC-Kp. Although cohorting KPC-Kp+ patients into rooms with other carriers can be an outbreak-control strategy and may protect negative patients from colonization, it is unclear whether cohorted patients are at unintended increased risk of cross colonization with additional KPC-Kp strains. Methods: Cohorting KPC-Kp+ patients at admission into rooms with other positive patients was part of a bundled intervention that reduced transmission in a high-prevalence LTACH. Rectal surveillance culturing for KPC-Kp was performed at the start of the study, upon admission, and biweekly thereafter, capturing 94% of patients. We evaluated whole-genome sequencing (WGS) evidence of acquisition of distinct KPC-Kp strains in a convenience sample of patients positive for KPC-Kp at study start or admission to identify plausible secondary KPC-Kp acquisitions. Results: WGS multilocus sequence type (MLST) strain variability was observed among the 452 isolates from the 254 patients colonized by KPC-Kp (Fig. 1). Among the 32 patients who were positive at the beginning of the study or admission and had a secondary isolate collected at a later date (median, 89 days apart, range, 2–310 days), 17 (53%) had secondary isolates differing by MLST from their admission isolate. Although 60% of the KPC-Kp in the study was ST258, there was substantial genomic variation within ST258 isolates from the same patient (range, 0–102 genetic variants), suggesting multiple acquisitions of distinct ST258 isolates. Among the 17 patients who imported ST258 and had ST258 isolated again later, 11 (65%) carried secondary isolates genetically closer to isolates from other importing patients than to their own ST258 (Fig. 2). Examination of spatiotemporal exposures among patients with evidence of multiple acquisitions revealed that 11 (65%) patients with multiple MLSTs shared a room with a patient who was colonized with an isolate matching the secondary MLST, and 6 (35%) patients who carried multiple distinct ST258 isolates shared a room with a patient who imported these closely related isolates prior to secondary acquisition. Conclusions: Half of patients who imported KPC-Kp and had multiple isolates available had genomically supported secondary acquisitions linked to roommates who carried the acquired strains. Although cohorting is intended to protect negative patients from acquiring MDROs, this practice may promote multiple strain acquisitions by colonized patients in the cohort, potentially prolonging the period of MDRO carriage and increasing time at risk of infection. Our findings add to the debate about single-patient rooms, which may be preferred to cohorts to minimize potential harms by reducing MDRO transmission.

Funding: None

Disclosures: None

Background: Stollery Children’s Hospital (SCH) is a tertiary-care pediatric hospital with a complex infrastructure: 3 NICUs located at 3 different hospitals, and all of the pediatric inpatient beds, PICU, PCICU, and a medical-surgical NICU at the main SCH site shared buildings with an academic adult hospital. We describe a collaborative process used to develop standardized SCH Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) recommendations. Methods: The SCH IPC formed a working group with Patient and Family-Centered Care (PFCC) and family representatives in 2014 to enhance the engagement of families in regards to IPC issues and initiatives. The working group identified inconsistent messages provided to families when a child was admitted as a patient requiring additional precautions (PRAP). The working group then developed a framework of key questions to be answered for family care providers of PRAP. The working group held several consultative meetings with frontline staff followed by a review of published guidelines and consultations with other pediatric hospitals about contentious issues. A consensus meeting with all key stakeholders was held to finalize IPC recommendations. Results: The key contentious issues included (1) whether personal protective equipment is required for family care providers who stay overnight with PRAP and (2) whether family care providers of PRAP are allowed to access nutrition centers on clinical units and family lounges in PCICU–PICU–NICU that were stocked with free hot meals for the families. No directly applicable recommendation was available IPC guidelines on these issues. Discussions of these topics were directed by PFCC at family councils of various clinical programs with efforts to seek opinions from more family representatives. Expert opinions and current practice were also obtained from Canadian hospitals through emails and from US hospitals through SHEA Open Forum by ICP. A final consensus meeting revisiting all available information was held, and a new Stollery IPC guideline was created with families as partners sharing the IPC vision of minimizing transmission risk at SCH. Conclusions: A consultative engagement and consensus process was successful in the development of IPC recommendations for family care providers for PRAP for implementation at a tertiary-care pediatric hospital with a complex infrastructure. The next step is to develop family-friendly educational and resource materials with clear and concise messages.

Funding: None

Disclosures: None

Background: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus(MRSA) and carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) are a growing public health concern in Barbados. Intensive care and critically ill patients are at a higher risk for MRSA and CRKP colonization and infection. MRSA and CRKP colonization and infection are associated with a high mortality and morbidly rate in the intensive care units (ICUs) and high-dependency units (HDUs). There is no concrete evidence in the literature regarding MRSA and CRKP colonization and infection in Barbados or the Caribbean. Objectives: We investigated the prevalence of MRSA and CRKP colonization and infection in the patients of the ICU and HDU units at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital from 2013 to 2017. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of patients admitted to the MICU, SICU, and HDU from January 2013 through December 2017. Data were collected as part of the surveillance program instituted by the IPC department. Admissions and weekly swabs for rectal, nasal, groin, and axilla were performed to screen for colonization with MRSA and CRKP. Follow-up was performed for positive cultures from sterile isolates, indicating infection. Positive MRSA and CRKP colonization or infection were identified, and patient notes were collected. Our exclusion criteria included patients with a of stay of <48 hours and patients with MRSA or CRKP before admission. Results: Of 3,641 of persons admitted 2,801 cases fit the study criteria. Overall, 161 (5.3%) were colonized or infected with MRSA alone, 215 (7.67%) were colonized or infected with CRKP alone, and 15 (0.53%) were colonized or infected with both MRSA and CRKP. In addition, 10 (66.6%) of patients colonized or infected with MRSA and CRKP died. Average length of stay of patients who died was 50 days. Conclusions: The results of this study demonstrate that MRSA and CRKP cocolonization and coinfection is associated with high mortality in patients within the ICU and HDU units. Patients admitted to the ICU and HDU with an average length of stay of 50 days are at a higher risk for cocolonization and coinfection with MRSA and CRKP. Stronger IPC measures must be implemented to reduce the spread and occurrence of MRSA and CRKP.

Funding: None

Disclosures: None

Background: The prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is diverse in different geographic regions, and transmission of MRSA in hospital settings occurs either through the patients or asymptomatic healthcare workers who MRSA colonized in the nares and thus act as a potential reservoir of infection for susceptible patients. Methods:S. aureus isolates were collected from ICU patients and healthcare workers at Gauhati Medical College and Hospital, Assam, India, from May 2010 to April 2015. Premoistened swab samples were obtained from the ICU patients from 4 different sites (ie, nares, axilla, groin, and perianal region) within 48 hours of admission. For healthcare workers (HCWs) a nasal swab was obtained. The isolates were identified by phenotypic and genotypic methods using CLSI guidelines and PCR (fem B, MecA, and PVL). The antibiograms were obtained using a Vitek 2 system. Results: For 84 patients admitted to the ICU, swab samples were obtained from various sites, and S. aureus was observed in 34 samples (40.5%). Among the isolates, 13 (38%) were MRSA and 21 (62%) were methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA). Among the HCWs from the ICU, growth of S. aureus was obtained in 10 of 30 samples (33.34%), of which 3 (30%) were MRSA and 7 (70%) were MSSA. S. aureus isolates were genotypically identified as fem B among colonized patients (40.5%) and HCWs (33.34%). MRSA (mecA positive) was detected in 3% of colonized patients and 30% of HCWs. Among the ICU patients, 78.56% were PVL-positive S. aureus: 21.42% were PVL-positive MRSA and 57.14% were PVL-positive MSSA. Multilocus sequence typing of the 7 housekeeping genes against 2 S. aureus isolates showed the presence of ST1428, which had not been reported in India, whereas the other sequence was entirely novel. The MDR rates were 68% and 75% among ICU patients and HCWs, respectively, and all the strains were mupirocin sensitive. The S. aureus isolates were significantly proportional among HCWs compared to the colonized group (P = .031). Conclusions: The study results show a high prevalence of PVL-positive MSSA and MRSA among ICU patients. This finding indicates its transmission among hospitalized patients through the HCWs, for which constant monitoring of the pathogen, particularly its phenotypic and genotypic variations and antimicrobial resistance pattern, is needed to develop effective strategies for infection prevention.

Funding: None

Disclosures: None

Background: Kidney transplant recipients are a group of patients at risk for healthcare-related infections. The results of this study make an important clinical contribution and contribute to findings options to decrease the infection-related morbidity and mortality that affects this patient population. Objectives: We evaluated the prevalence of colonization by multidrug-resistant bacteria, Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)–producing bacteria, vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in renal transplant patients; we identified the infection rate, morbidity, and mortality in this population. Methods: Prospective cohort study was conducted at the Kidney and Hypertension Hospital from 2012 to 2015. This project was approved by the Unifesp Research Ethics Committee (no. 1630/11) and an informed consent form was obtained from patients included in the study. Study protocol: Data collection was performed in 2 phases: within the first 24 hours after transplantation and 7 days after transplantation. For all included patients, the following data were collected: identification data, clinical data, and laboratory tests of the first day in the study. All included patients (colonized or not) were followed prospectively for 6 months or until treatment change or death. Results: The study included 200 renal transplant patients in accordance with the inclusion and exclusion criteria. We observed that 76 (38%) patients included in our sample were colonized; 8% S. aureus, 11% Enterococcus, and 19% K. pneumoniae. We verified the presence of concomitant colonization of 1 or more of these pathogens. The most prevalent concomitance identified in our population was E. coli and K. pneumoniae. We identified the presence of diabetes and diabetes associated with hypertension as risk factor for colonization. Thus, patients with more systemic complications may be at risk for colonization by multidrug-resistant bacteria. Another risk factor for colonization was antibiotic use in the 6 months prior to transplantation. Transplant-related outcomes were length of stay after transplantation, delayed graft function (ie, dialysis after the transplantation) and postoperative care in an intensive care unit. At the 6-month follow-up, we identified urinary infection and surgical site infection as risk factors. One death occurred due to stroke in the group of colonized patients, unrelated to infectious causes. Conclusions: These results show fundamental aspects for health professionals for bacterial characterization, transmission, and resistance mechanisms and, mainly, tools for prevention and control of multidrug-resistant bacteria from patients colonized under conservative treatment before the complexity of high-risk procedures begins, such as dialysis and transplantation to reduce morbidity and mortality.

Funding: FAPESP São Paulo Research Support Foundation

Disclosures: None

Background: Estimating the burden of intestinal colonization with antibiotic-resistant gram-negative bacteria (AR-GNB) is critical to understanding their global epidemiology and spread. We aimed to determine the prevalence of, and risk factors for, intestinal colonization due to AR-GNB in population-based hospital and community settings in Chile. Methods: Between December 2018 and May 2019, we enrolled randomly selected hospitalized adults in 4 tertiary-care public hospitals (Antofagasta, Santiago, Curico and Puerto Montt), and adults residing in a community-based cohort in the rural town of Molina. Following informed consent, we collected rectal swabs and epidemiological information through a standardized questionnaire. Swabs were plated onto MacConkey agar with 2 µg/mL ciprofloxacin or ceftazidime. All recovered morphotypes were identified, and antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed via disk diffusion. The primary outcome was the prevalence of colonization with fluoroquinolone (FQ)- or third-generation cephalosporin (3GC)–resistant GNB. The secondary outcome was the prevalence of colonization with multidrug-resistant (MDR) GNB, defined as GNB resistant to ≥3 antibiotic classes. Categories were not mutually exclusive. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed to describe risk factors for colonization with these categories. Results: In total, 775 hospitalized adults and 357 community participants were enrolled, with a median age of 60 years (IQR, 42–72) and 55 years (IQR, 48–62) years, respectively. Among hospitalized participants, the prevalence of colonization with FQ- or 3GC-resistant GNB was 47% (95% CI, 43%–50%) and 41% (95% CI, 38%–45%), respectively, whereas the prevalence of MDR-GNB colonization was 27% (95% CI, 24%–31%). In the community setting, the prevalence of colonization with either FQ-, 3GC-resistant GNB, or MDR-GNB was 40% (95% CI, 34%–45%), 29% (95% CI, 24%– 34%), and 5% (95% CI, 3%–8%), respectively. Independent risk factors for hospital MDR-GNB colonization included the hospital of admission, unit of hospitalization (intensive care units carried the highest risk), in-hospital antimicrobial exposure, comorbidities (Charlson index), and length of stay. In the community setting, recent antibiotic exposure (<3 months) predicted colonization with either FQ- or 3GC-resistant GNB, and alcohol consumption was inversely associated with MDR GNB colonization. Conclusions: A high burden of colonization with AR-GNB was observed in this sample of hospitalized and community-dwelling adults in Chile. The high burden of colonization with GNB resistant to commonly used antibiotics such as FQ and 3GC found in community dwellers, suggests that the community may be a relevant source of antibiotic resistance. Efforts to understand relatedness between resistant strains circulating in the community and the hospital are needed.

Funding: None

Disclosures: None

Background: Most medical and surgical devices used in healthcare facilities are made of materials that are sterilized by heat (ie, heat stable), primarily steam sterilization. Low-temperature sterilization methods developed for heat and moisture sensitive devices include ethylene oxide gas (ETO), hydrogen peroxide gas plasma (HPGP), vaporized hydrogen peroxide (VHP), and hydrogen peroxide plus ozone. This study is the first to evaluate the microbicidal activity of the FDA-cleared VHP sterilizer and other methods (Table 1) in the presence of salt and serum (10% FCS). Methods: Brushed stainless steel discs (test carriers) were inoculated with test microbes (Table 1) and subjected to 4 sterilization methods: steam, ETO, VHP and HPGP. Results: Steam sterilization killed all 5 vegetative and 3 spore-forming test organisms in the presence of salt and serum (Table 1). Similarly, the ETO and the HPGP sterilizers inactivated the test organisms with a failure rate of 1.9% for each (ie, 6 of 310 for ETO and 5 of 270 for HPGP). Although steam had no failures compared to both ETO and HPGP, which demonstrated some failures for vegetative bacteria, there was no significant difference comparing the failure rate of steam to either ETO (P > .05) or HPGP (P > .05). However, the VHP system tested failed to inactivate all the test organisms in 76.3% of the tests (206 of 270; P < .00001) (Table 1). Conclusions: This investigation demonstrated that steam sterilization was the most effective method, followed by ETO and HPGP and, lastly, VHP.

Funding: None

Disclosures: Dr. Rutala was a consultant to ASP (Advanced Sterilization Products)

Background: The bacteria that inhabit outpatient healthcare facilities influence patient outcomes and recovery, although the diversity and quantity of these bacterial communities is largely unknown. Whether differences in bacterial presence exist in individual medical specialty units of an outpatient clinic is also largely unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare bacterial species found in the general medicine and pulmonary units of an outpatient children’s clinic associated with a teaching hospital. Methods: In total, 6 locations (4 floor sites, counters, air ducts) were sampled in 3 rooms in the pulmonary (PUL) unit and 3 rooms in the general medicine (GM) unit on 13 days over a 6-month period. Sterile double transport swabs were utilized, transported on ice to a microbiology lab, and used to inoculate Hardy Diagnostics Cdiff Banana Broth (for Clostridium difficile), CHROM MRSA agar (for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus [MRSA]), eosin methylene blue (Levine-type, for Lac+ gram negatives [GN]), and Pseudomonas isolation agar (for Pseudomonas spp and P. aeruginosa [PS and PSA]). Media were incubated for 48 hours at 37°C and were scored for bacterial presence based on colonial observation. Results: The presence of bacteria isolated from GM and PUL units differed by species and location. Based on the percentage of positive swabs, the presence of GN was widespread in both units (Fig 1). Additionally, bacterial presence was greatest on the floors (GN ranged from 72% to 85% on floors in the 2 units), whereas counters had fewer positive swabs (GN ranged from 23% to 38% on counters), and swabs from return air ducts rarely led to bacterial growth. The 1 case in which swabs from the PUL unit resulted in higher levels of bacterial growth than for the GM unit was for PSA (GM, 8%; PUL, 13%). C. difficile detection was the same on both units (ie, 35% of floor samples showed contamination). Conclusions: The levels of environmental bacterial presence observed for these clinic units differed in some cases by unit and ranged from not detectable to very high levels. Detection of C. difficile on 35% of floor samples in both units could be problematic. Additionally, for the PUL unit, contamination of 13% of floor samples by PSA should raise concerns because many patients in this clinic have cystic fibrosis (CF). Although many CF patients are colonized by PSA, others may potentially contract an infection by this pathogen from the clinical environment. This observation supports current infection control recommendations for CF patients in outpatient settings.

Funding: None

Disclosures: None

Background: In Alberta, Canada, surgical site infections (SSIs) following total hip and knee replacements (THRs and TKRs) are reported using the infection prevention and control (IPC) surveillance system, which surveys all THRs and TKRs using the NHSN definitions; and the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP), which uses different definitions and sampling strategies. Deterministic matching of patient data from these sources was used to examine the overlap and discrepancies in SSI reporting. Methods: A retrospective multisite cohort study of IPC and NSQIP superficial, deep, and organ-space THR/TKR SSI data collected 30 days postoperatively from September 1, 2015, to March 31, 2018 was undertaken. To identify patients with procedures captured by both IPC and NSQIP, data were cleaned, duplicates removed, and patients matched 1:1 using year of birth, procedure facility, type, side, date, and time. Positive and negative agreement were assessed, and the Cohen κ values were calculated. The definitions and data capture methods used by both IPC and NSQIP were also compared. Results: There were 7,549 IPC and 2,037 NSQIP patients, respectively, with 1,798 matched patients: IPC (23.8%) and NSQIP (88.3%). Moreover, 17 SSIs were identified by both IPC and NSQIP, including 9 superficial and 8 complex by IPC and 6 superficial and 11 complex by NSQIP. Also, 7 SSIs were identified only by IPC, of which 5 were superficial, and 36 SSIs were identified only by NSQIP, of which 28 were superficial (positive agreement, 0.44; negative agreement, 0.99; κ = .43). Excluding superficial SSIs, 7 SSIs were identified by both IPC and NSQIP; 3 were identified only by IPC; and 12 were identified only by NSQIP (positive agreement, 0.48; negative agreement, 1.00; κ = 0.48). Conclusions: THR/TKR SSI rates reported by IPC and NSQIP were not comparable in this matched dataset. NSQIP identifies more superficial SSIs. Variations in data capture methods and definitions accounted for most of the discordance. Both surveillance systems are critically involved with improving patient outcomes following surgery. However, stakeholders need to be aware of these variations, and education should be provided to facilitate an understanding of the differences and their interpretation. Future work should explore other surgical procedures and larger data sets.

Funding: None

Disclosures: None

Background: The standardized infection ratio (SIR) is the nationally adopted metric used to track and compare catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) and central-line– associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs). Despite its widespread use, the SIR may not be suitable for all settings and may not capture all catheter harm. Our objective was to look at the correlation between SIR and device use for CAUTIs and CLABSIs across community hospitals in a regional network. Methods: We compared SIR and SUR (standardized utilization ratio) for CAUTIs and CLABSIs across 43 hospitals in the Duke Infection Control Outreach Network (DICON) using a scatter plot and calculated an R2 value. Hospitals were stratified into large (>70,000 patient days), medium (30,000–70,000 patient days), and small hospitals (<30,000 patient days) based on DICON’s benchmarking for community hospitals. Results: We reviewed 24 small, 11 medium, and 8 large hospitals within DICON. Scatter plots for comparison of SIRs and SURs for CLABSIs and CAUTIs across our network hospitals are shown in Figs. 1 and 2. We detected a weak positive overall correlation between SIR and SUR for CLABSIs (0.33; R2 = 0.11), but no correlation between SIR and SUR for CAUTIs (−0.07; R2 = 0.00). Of 15 hospitals with SUR >1, 7 reported SIR <1 for CLABSIs, whereas 10 of 13 hospitals with SUR >1 reported SIR <1 for CAUTIs. Smaller hospitals showed a better correlation for CLABSI SIR and SUR (0.37) compared to medium and large hospitals (0.19 and 0.22, respectively). Conversely, smaller hospitals showed no correlation between CAUTI SIR and SUR, whereas medium and larger hospitals showed a negative correlation (−0.31 and −0.39, respectively). Conclusions: Our data reveal a weak positive correlation between SIR and SUR for CLABSIs, suggesting that central line use impacts CLABSI SIR to some extent. However, we detected no correlation between SIR and SUR for CAUTIs in smaller hospitals and a negative correlation for medium and large hospitals. Some hospitals with low CAUTI SIRs might actually have higher device use, and vice versa. Therefore, the SIR alone does not adequately reflect preventable harm related to urinary catheters. Public reporting of SIR may incentivize hospitals to focus more on urine culture stewardship rather than reducing device utilization.

Funding: None

Disclosures: None

Background: Healthcare exposure results in significant microbiome disruption, particularly in the setting of critical illness, which may contribute to risk for healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). Patients admitted to long-term acute-care hospitals (LTACHs) have extensive prior healthcare exposure and critical illness; significant microbiome disruption has been previously documented among LTACH patients. We compared the predictive value of 3 respiratory tract microbiome disruption indices—bacterial community diversity, dominance, and absolute abundance—as they relate to risk for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and adverse ventilator-associated events (VAE), which commonly complicate LTACH care. Methods: We enrolled 83 subjects on admission to an academic LTACH for ventilator weaning and performed longitudinal sampling of endotracheal aspirates, followed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing (Illumina HiSeq), bacterial community profiling (QIIME2) for diversity, and 16S rRNA quantitative PCR (qPCR) for total bacterial abundance. Statistical analyses were performed with R and Stan software. Mixed-effects models were fit to relate the admission MDIs to subsequent clinically diagnosed VAP and VAE. Results: Of the 83 patients, 19 had been diagnosed with pneumonia during the 14 days prior to LTACH admission (ie, “recent past VAP”); 23 additional patients were receiving antibiotics consistent with empiric VAP therapy within 48 hours of admission (ie, “empiric VAP therapy”); and 41 patients had no evidence of VAP at admission (ie, “no suspected VAP”). We detected no statistically significant differences in admission Shannon diversity, maximum amplicon sequence variant (ASV)–level proportional abundance, or 16S qPCR across the variables of interest. In isolation, all 3 admission microbiome disruption indices showed poor predictive performance, though Shannon diversity performed better than maximum ASV abundance. Predictive models that combined (1) bacterial diversity or abundance with (2) recent prior VAP diagnosis and (3) concurrent antibiotic exposure best predicted 14-day VAP (type S error < 0.05) and 30-day VAP (type S error < 0.003). In this cohort, VAE risk was paradoxically associated with higher admission Shannon diversity and lower admission maximum ASV abundance. Conclusions: In isolation, respiratory tract microbiome disruption indices obtained at LTACH admission showed poor predictive performance for subsequent VAP and VAE. But diversity and abundance models incorporating recent VAP history and admission antibiotic exposure performed well predicting 14-day and 30-day VAP.

Disclosures: None

Funding: None

Background: Sink drainage systems are a potential reservoir for the dissemination of gram-negative bacilli but are not amenable to standard methods of cleaning and disinfection. Pouring liquid disinfectants down drains has only a limited and transient effect on drain colonization, presumably due to inadequate disinfectant contact time and suboptimal penetration into areas harboring biofilm-associated organisms. Methods: We compared the antimicrobial efficacy of 2 novel sink disinfection methods intended to enhance disinfectant contact time and penetration. Healthcare facility sinks were randomly assigned to disinfection with 300 mL hydrogen peroxide-based disinfectant applied either as a foam (N = 13 sinks) or instilled for 30 minutes behind a temporary obstruction created by an inflated urinary catheter balloon (N = 12 sinks). Swabs were used to collect quantitative cultures from the proximal sink drain to depth of 2.5 cm (1 inch) below the strainer before treatment and at 15 minutes and 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 days after treatment. Repeated measures analysis of variance was performed to compare the efficacy of the 2 treatments. Results: As shown in Fig. 1, both methods yielded an initial reduction of >3 log10 CFU of gram-negative bacilli. Over the 7-day follow-up period, disinfectant instillation resulted in significantly greater reduction than the foam application (P < .01). Recovery of sink colonization to >2 log per swab occurred at day 3 for both treatments, whereas recovery to >3 log per swab occurred on day 3 for the foam treatment versus day 7 for disinfectant instillation. Conclusions: Two novel disinfection methods were effective in reducing sink drain colonization for several days. The instillation method was more effective than the foam method in maintaining reductions over 7 days.

Funding: None

Disclosures: None

Disclosures: None

Funding: None

Background: Stringent compliance with standard precautions is of utmost importance for reducing the spread of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs); however, the role of medical and nursing students is often underappreciated. Because undergraduate and graduate nursing programs combine classroom education and clinical training, nursing students are already important stakeholders in HAI risk reduction and patient safety endeavors. Objectives: In this study, we appraised self-reported adherence to standard precautions among university nursing students, and we examined factors that may influence their level of compliance. Methods: In total, 362 undergraduate and graduate university nursing students form the University North in Croatia (Europe), enrolled in courses or modules with clinical placement, were surveyed in this self-reported cross-sectional study. A 2-part self-administered questionnaire was used, consisting of a demographic survey and a globally applicable 20-item Compliance with Standard Precautions Scale (CSPS). Differences were examined by an independent t test and analysis of variance (ANOVA), and factors influencing compliance were further appraised by a standard multiple linear regression analysis. Significance was set at P <.05 (2-sided). Results: The overall compliance rate in this study was 58.4%. The highest compliance rate was observed for wearing gloves when exposed to body fluids, blood products, and any excretion of patients (82.8%); conversely, the lowest compliance rate was reported for disposing a sharps box before it was full (27.2%). Higher rates of compliance were seen in female nursing students compared with their male counterparts (P = 0.039). Even though age was not a significant predictor, there was an increase in compliance rates according to the academic year level (P < .001). Conclusions: Our results indicate that the overall compliance rate of the Croatian nursing students was moderate, although there was a trend toward more rigorous standard precaution adherence with more education and clinical experience. These findings highlight the need to improve the nursing curriculum to integrate more material on infection control practices early in the program, consequently bridging the gap between theory and practice. Finally, a supportive culture of infection control adherence in quotidian clinical practice must be continuously fostered.

Funding: None

Disclosures: None