No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Surveillance for Quality Assessment III. The Critical Assessment of Quality Indicators
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 June 2016
Extract
The first two articles in this series reviewed the reasons for widespread acceptance of surveillence and control methods in hospital infection control programs, and discussed important factors contributing to the successes and failures in applying this approach to noninfectious nosocomial events. The quality assurance program ‘targets of surveillence” identified in these articles are referred to as “quality indicators” by other authors and have been defined as “a quantitative measure that can be used as a guide to monitor and evaluate the quality of important patient care and support service activities.” This article highlights those attributes of quality indicators that should be critiqued prior to implementation in a patient care review environment and discusses methods of improving quality indicator performance with ongoing monitoring and evaluation.
- Type
- Special Sections
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1990
References
1.
Credé, W, Hierholzer, WJ. Surveillance for quality assessment: I. surveillance in infection control. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1989;10:470–474.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.
McGeer, A, Credé, W, Hierholzer, WJ. Surveillance for quality assessment: II. surveulence for noninfectious processes: back to basics. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1990;11:36–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Accreditation Manual for Hospitals, 1990. Chicago, Ill: Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations; 1989:214.Google Scholar
5.
Steel, K, Gertman, PM, Crecenzi, C, Anderson, J. Iatrogenic illness on a general medical service at a university hospital. N Engl J Med. 1981;304:638–642.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.
Craddick, J. The medical management analysis system: a professional liability warning mechanism. QRB. 1979%8.Google ScholarPubMed
7.
Feinstein, AR. On the sensitivity, specificity, and discrimination of diagnostic tests. Clinical Biostatistics. St. Louis, MO: CV Mosby; 1977 214.226
Google ScholarPubMed
8.
Haley, OW. Schaberg, DR, McClish, DK, et al.
The accuracy of retrospective chart review in measuring nosocomial infection rates. Am J Epidemiol
1980;111:516–533.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.
Grover, FL, Hammermeister, KE, Burchfiel, , et al.
Initial report of the Veterans Administration preoperative risk assessment study for cardiac surgery. Presented at the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Annual Meeting; September 11, 1989; Baltimore, Md.Google Scholar
10.
Dubois, RW, Rogers, WH. Moxley, JH III, Draper, D, Brook, RH. Hospital in-patient mortality: is it a predictor of quality?
N Engl J Med. 1987;317:1674–1679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.
Haley, RW. Culver, DH, White, JW, et al.
The efficacy of infection surveillance and control programs in preventing nosocomial infections in U.S. hospitals. Am J Epidemiol. 1985;121:182–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar