Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T00:44:07.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: A Questionnaire Survey of 75 Long-Term Care Facilities in Western New York

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

Joseph M. Mylotte ,
Jurgis Karuza  and
David W. Bentley
Joseph M. Mylotte*
Affiliation:
Infectious Diseases Division and Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, the State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York
Jurgis Karuza
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, Division of Gerontology/Geriatrics, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, the State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York
David W. Bentley
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, Division of Gerontology/Geriatrics, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, the State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York
*
Department of Medicine, Buffalo General Hospital, 100 High St., Buffalo, NY 14203
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives:

To determine the frequency of recognition of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) as an infection control problem and its prevalence among long-term care facilities, and to evaluate whether certain long-term care facility characteristics such as bed size, ownership, level of infection control activity, and frequency of resident transfers to acute care hospitals are related to the recognition or prevalence of MRSA in this setting.

Design:

Questionnaire survey.

Setting:

Seventy-five long-term care facilities in the 8 counties of western New York.

Results:

Seventy-five of 81 (92.6%) long-term care facilities returned a completed questionnaire. Seventy-nine percent were considered to have a “limited” level of infection control activity (part-time infection control practitioner who spent less than 10 hours a week on infection control activities). The larger the long-term care facility, the more time was spent on infection control activities (p = .01). Seventy-two percent of the long-term care facilities screened new admissions for MRSA by reviewing culture reports; 69% of the long-term care facilities had a specific infection control policy for MRSA. Sixteen of the 75 (21%) facilities felt they had an infection control problem with MRSA. By univariate analysis, the only characteristic significantly associated with this recognition was use of nurse practitioners or physician assistants by a facility (p<.05). Eighty-one percent of the 75 long-term care facilities had identified one or more patients with MRSA in the year prior to the survey. By univariate analysis, the only characteristics that were significantly associated with the number of residents with MRSA were the monthly average number of residents transferred to acute care facilities (p = .034) and facility bed size (p= .022); there was also a trend toward increasing intensity of infection control activities (p= .085). However, facility bed size and the average number of resident transfers per month to acute care facilities were strongly associated (p = .0002). By stepwise logistic regression analysis, only bed size was an independent predictor of the number of residents with MRSA. Many long-term care facilities had tried to eradicate MRSA; ciprofloxacin was most commonly used to eradicate MRSA.

Conclusions:

The vast majority of the 75 long-term care facilities in the 8 counties of western New York have identified patients with MRSA, although only a minority (21%) of them actually believed that an infection control problem existed. Facility size (a surrogate for the monthly average number of resident transfers to acute care facilities) seems to be an important factor in determining the number of residents with MRSA in long-term care facilities in our geographic region. The major longitudinal studies of MRSA in such facilities have so far been done only in Veterans Affairs facilities. Further studies are needed in freestanding long-term care facilities, the largest group of long-term care facilities in the United States, to determine the epidemiology of MRSA in this setting and to develop practical and valid infection control methods for residents with MRSA.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 13 , Issue 12 , December 1992 , pp. 711 - 718
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Boyce, JM, Causey, WA. Increasing occurrence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the United States. Infect Control. 1982;3:377–383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Boyce, JM. Increasing prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the United States. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1990;11:639–642.Google Scholar
3. Thompson, RL, Cabezudo, I, Wenzel, RP. Epidemiology of nosocomial infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus . Ann Intern Med. 1982;97:309–317.Google Scholar
4. Hsu, CCS, Macaluso, CP, Special, L, Hubble, RH. High rate of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from hospitalized nursing home patients. Arch Intern Med. 1988;148:569–570.Google Scholar
5. Thomas, IC. Bridge, I. Waterman, S. Vogt, I. Kilman, L. Hancock, G. Transmission and control of methicillm-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a skilled nursing facility. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1989;10:106–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Storch, GA, Radcliff, JL, Meyer, PL, Hinrichs, JH. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a nursing home. Infect Control. 1987;8:24–29.Google Scholar
7. Haley, RW, Hightower, AW, Khabbaz, RF, et al. The emergence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in United States hospitals. Possible role of the house&&patient transfer circuit. Ann Intern Med. 1982;97:297–308.Google Scholar
8. Barrett, FE McGehee, RF, Finland, M. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at Boston City Hospital. N Engl J Med. 1968;279:441–448.Google Scholar
9. Ward, TT, Winn, RE, Hartstein, AI, et al. Observations relating to an interhospital outbreak of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: role of antimicrobial therapy in infection control. Infect Control. 1982;2:453–459.Google Scholar
10. O'Toole, RD, Drew, WL, Dahlgren, BJ, Beaty, HN. An outbreak of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection. Observations in hospital and nursing home. JAMA. 1970;213:257–263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Strausbaugh, LJ, Jacobson, C, Sewell, DL, Potter, S, Ward, TT. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in extended-care facilities: experiences in a Veterans' Affairs nursing home and a review of the literature. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1991;12:36–45.Google Scholar
12. Muder, RR, Brennen, C, Wahener, MM, et al. Methicillin-resistant staphylococcal colonization and infection in a long-term care facility. Ann Intern Med. 1991;114:107–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Hsu, CCS. Serial survey of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage among residents in a nursing home. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1991;12:416–421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Bradley, SE Terpenning, MS, Ramsey, MA, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: colonization and infection in a long-term care facility. Ann Intern Med. 1991;115:417–422.Google Scholar
15. Murphy, S, Denman, S, Bennett, RG, Greenough, WB, Lindsay, J, Zelesnick, LB. Methicillin-resistant Stuphylococcus aureus colonization in a long-term care facility. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992;40:213–217.Google Scholar
16. Kauffman, CA, Bradley, SE Terpenning, MS. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in long-term care facilities. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1990;11:600–603.Google Scholar
17. Boyce, JM. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in nursing homes: putting the problem in perspective. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1991;12:413–415.Google Scholar
18. Thurn, JR, Belongia, EA, Crossley, K. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Minnesota nursing homes. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39:1105–1109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Dillman, DA Mail and telephone surveys. In: The Total Design Method. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons; 1978.Google Scholar
20. National Center for Health Statistics, A. Sirrocco. 1989. Nursing home characteristics; 1986 inventory of long-term care places. Vital Health Statistics Series 14. No. 33. DHHS Pub No. (PHS) 89-1828. Public Health Service; Centers for Disease Control, Hyattsville, Maryland.Google Scholar
21. Barry, AL, Jones, RN. Reliability of high-content disks and modified broth dilution tests for detecting staphylococcal resistance to the penicillinase-resistant penicillins. J Clin Microbiol. 1987;25:1897–1901.Google Scholar
22. Chambers, HE Methicillin-resistant staphylococci, Clin Microbiol Rev. 1988;1:173–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23. Crossley, KB, Irvine, P, Kaszar, DJ, Loewenson, RB. Infection control practices in Minnesota nursing homes. JAMA. 1985;254:2918–2921.Google Scholar
24. Pearson, DA, Checko, PJ, Hierholzer, WJ, Jekel, JE Infection control practitioners and committees in skilled nursing facilities in Connecticut. Am J Infect Control. 1990;18:167–175.Google Scholar
25. Khabbaz, RF, Tenney, JH. Infection control in Maryland nursing homes. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1988;9:159–162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26. Trucksis, M, Hooper, DC, Wolfson, JS. Emerging resistance to fluoroquinolones in staphylococci: an alert. Ann Intern Med. 1991;114:424–426.Google Scholar
27. Mylotte, JM. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in long-term care facilities. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1991;12:274,276,278.Google Scholar
28. Mylotte, JM. Resistant staphylococcal infection. Ann Intern Med. 1991;114:911–912.Google Scholar
29. Mylotte, JM. The hospital epidemiologist in long-term care: practical considerations. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1991;12:439–442.Google Scholar