Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T02:21:20.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Blood Culture Contamination Definitions Can Obscure the Extent of Blood Culture Contamination: A New Standard for Satisfactory Institution Performance Is Needed

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2016

Richard G. Patton
Richard G. Patton*
Affiliation:
CellNetix Pathology and Laboratories, PLLC, Seattle, Washington.
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Richard G. Patton, MD, 2561 Magnolia Boulevard West, Seattle, WA 98199 ([email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Briefs
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 37 , Issue 6 , June 2016 , pp. 736 - 738
Copyright
© 2016 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Richter, SS, Beekmann, SE, Croco, JL, et al. Minimizing the workup of blood culture contaminants: implementation and evaluation of a laboratory-based algorithm. J Clin Microbiol 2002;40:2437–2444.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Bekeris, LG, Tworek, JA, Walsh, MK, Valenstein, PN. 2005. Trends in blood culture contamination: a College of American Pathologists Q-tracks study of 356 institutions. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2005;29:1222–1225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Alcorn, KW, Meier, FA. The College of American Pathologists (CAP) Q-Tracks Blood Culture Contamination. Annual Summary Report 2010. Northfield, IL: College of American Pathologists Press, 2010.Google Scholar
4. Bates, DW, Goldman, L, Lee, TH. Contaminant blood cultures and resource utilization: the true consequences of false-positive results. JAMA 1991;265:365–369.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. CPI inflation calculator. Bureau of Labor Statistics website. http://www.bls.gov/data/inflation_calculator.htm. Accessed February 11, 2016.Google Scholar
6. Surdulescu, S, Utarnsingh, D, Shukar, R. Phlebotomy teams reduce blood-culture contamination rate and save money. Clin Perform Health Care 1998;6:60–62.Google ScholarPubMed
7. Souvenir, DS, Anderson, DE JR, Palpant, S, et al. Blood cultures positive for coagulase-negative staphylococci: antisepsis, pseudobacteremia, and therapy of patients. J Clin Microbiol 1998;36:1923–1926.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Quality Management in Clinical Laboratories. Promoting Patient Safety Through Risk Reduction And Continuous Improvement. Northfield, IL; College of American Pathologists Press; 2005.Google Scholar
9. Dunne, WM Jr, Nolte, FS, Wilson, ML. Cumitech 1, Blood Cultures III. Coordinating ed. JA Hindler. Washington, DC: ASM Press; 1997.Google Scholar
10. Snyder, SR, Favoretto, AM, Baetz, RA, et al. Effectiveness of practices to reduce blood culture contamination: a Laboratory Medicine Best Practices systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Biochem 2012;45:999–1011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed