Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T02:19:21.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Laboratory-based study of novel antimicrobial cold spray coatings to combat surface microbial contamination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2020

M.D.I. Lucas
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical, Industrial and Aeronautical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, University of the Witwatersrand, Braamfontein, Johannesburg, South Africa
I. Botef
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical, Industrial and Aeronautical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, University of the Witwatersrand, Braamfontein, Johannesburg, South Africa
R. G. Reid
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical, Industrial and Aeronautical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, University of the Witwatersrand, Braamfontein, Johannesburg, South Africa
S. F. van Vuuren*
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Parktown, Johannesburg, South Africa
*
Author for correspondence: Sandy van Vuuren, Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Objective:

To investigate the touch-contact antimicrobial efficacy of novel cold spray surface coatings composed of copper and silver metals, regard to their rate of microbial elimination.

Design:

Antimicrobial time-kill assay.

Setting:

Laboratory-based study.

Methods:

An adapted time-kill assay was conducted to characterize the antimicrobial efficacy of the developed coatings. A simulated touch-contact pathogenic exposure to Gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923), Gram-negative Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853), and the yeast Candida albicans (ATCC 10231), as well as corresponding resistant strains of gentamicin-methicillin–resistant S. aureus (ATCC 33592), azlocillin-carbenicillin–resistant P. aeruginosa (DSM 46316), and a fluconazole-resistant C. albicans strain was undertaken. Linear regression modeling was used to deduce microbial reduction rates.

Results:

A >7 log reduction in microbial colony forming units was achieved within minutes on surfaces with cold spray coatings compared to a single log bacterial reduction on copper metal sheets within a 3 hour contact period. Copper-coated 3-dimensional (3D) printed acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) achieved complete microbial elimination against all tested pathogens within a 15 minute exposure period. Similarly, a copper-on-copper coating achieved microbial elimination within 10 minutes and within 5 minutes with the addition of silver powder as a 5 wt% coating constituent.

Conclusions:

In response to the global need for alternative solutions for infection control and prevention, these effective antimicrobial surface coatings were proposed. A longitudinal study is the next step toward technology integration.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© 2020 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

a

Deceased.

References

Schettler, T. Antimicrobials in hospital furnishings: do they help reduce healthcare-associated infections? US & Canada: Healthcare Without Harm. Safer Chemicals Program, 2016. Healthcare Without Harm website. https://noharm-uscanada.org/documents/antimicrobials-hospital-furnishings-do-they-help-reduce-healthcare-associated-infections. Published 2016. Accessed November 2019.Google Scholar
Ventola, CL. The antibiotic resistance crisis: part 1: causes and threats. Pharm Therapeut 2015;40:277283.Google ScholarPubMed
Kandel, CE, Simor, AE, Redelmeier, DA. Elevator buttons as unrecognized sources of bacterial colonization in hospitals. Open Med 2014;8:e81e86.Google ScholarPubMed
Messina, G, Ceriale, E, Lenzi, D, Burgassi, S, Azzolini, E, Manzi, P. Environmental contaminants in hospital settings and progress in disinfecting techniques. Biomed Res Int 2013;429780. doi: 10.1155/2013/429780.Google ScholarPubMed
WHO guidelines on hand hygiene in health care: a summary. World Health Organization website. https://www.who.int/gpsc/5may/tools/9789241597906/en/. Published 2009. Accessed November 2018.Google Scholar
Hand hygiene in healthcare settings. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. https://www.cdc.gov/handhygiene/index.html. Updated April 2019. Accessed November 2019.Google Scholar
Villapún, VM, Dover, LG, Cross, A, González, S. Antibacterial metallic touch surfaces. Materials 2016;9:736.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mann, EE, Mettetal, MR, May, RM, et al. Surface micropattern resists bacterial contamination transferred by healthcare practitioners. J Microbiol Exp 2014;1. doi: 10.15406/jmen.2014.01.00032.Google Scholar
Garza-Cervantes, JA, Chávez-Reyes, A, Castillo, EC, et al. Synergistic antimicrobial effects of silver/transition-metal combinatorial treatments. Sci Rep 2017;7. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-01017-7.Google ScholarPubMed
Grass, G, Rensing, C, Solioz, M. Metallic copper as an antimicrobial surface. Appl Environ Microbiol 2011;77:15411547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Casey, AL, Adams, D, Karpanen, TJ, et al. Role of copper in reducing hospital environment contamination. J Hosp Infect 2010;74:7277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marais, F, Mehtar, S, Chalkley, L. Antimicrobial efficacy of copper touch surfaces in reducing environmental bioburden in a South African community healthcare facility. J Hosp Infect 2010;74:8095.Google Scholar
Hans, M, Támara, JC, Mathews, S, et al. Laser cladding of stainless steel with a copper-silver alloy to generate surfaces of high antimicrobial activity. Appl Surf Sci 2014;320:195199.Google Scholar
Sharifahmadian, O, Salimijazi, HR, Fathi, MH, Mostaghimi, J, Pershin, L. Study of the antibacterial behavior of wire arc sprayed copper coatings. J Therm Spray Technol 2013;22:371379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Champagne, VK, Helfritch, DJ. A Demonstration of the antimicrobial effectiveness of various copper surfaces. J Biol Eng 2013;7. doi: 10.1186/1754-1611-7-8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Updated draft protocol for the evaluation of bactericidal activity of hard, non-porous copper containing surface products. United States Environmental Protection Agency website. https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-registration/updated-draft-protocol-evaluation-bactericidal-activity-hard-non-porous. Published 2016. Accessed May 2019.Google Scholar
Lucas, MDI, Botef, I, van Vuuren, S, inventors; The University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, assignee. Method of Applying an Antimicrobial Surface Coating to a Substrate, 2019, International publication number WO 2019/064216 AI. 2019 April 4.Google Scholar
Santajit, S, Indrawattana, N. Mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance in ESKAPE pathogens. BioMed Res Int 2016. doi: 10.1155/2016/2475067.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montgomery, DC, Runger, GC. Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers, 6th Edition. Singapore: John Wiley & Son; 2014.Google Scholar
Lucas, MDI. Antimicrobial surface coatings via cold spray and 3D printing technologies [PhD thesis]. University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg; submitted 2020.Google Scholar
Botef, I. Manufacturing—Design and Processes. Sandton, South Africa: Picsie Press; 2013.Google Scholar
Shrestha, R, Joshi, DR, Gopali, J, Piya, S. Oligodynamic action of silver, copper and brass on enteric bacteria isolated from water of Kathmandu valley. Nepal J Sci Tech 2009;10:189193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemire, JA, Harrison, JJ, Turner, RJ. Antimicrobial activity of metals: mechanisms, molecular targets and applications. Nat Rev Microbiol 2013;11:371384.Google ScholarPubMed