Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:57:17.674Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Inpatient Urine Cultures Are Frequently Performed Without Urinalysis or Microscopy: Findings From a Large Academic Medical Center

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2017

Abigail L. Carlson*
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
Satish Munigala
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
Anthony J. Russo
Affiliation:
Department of Hospital Epidemiology and Infection Prevention, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St Louis, Missouri
Kathleen M. McMullen
Affiliation:
Department of Hospital Epidemiology and Infection Prevention, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St Louis, Missouri
Helen Wood
Affiliation:
Department of Hospital Epidemiology and Infection Prevention, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St Louis, Missouri
Ronald Jackups
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri. (Present affiliation: Christian Hospital Department of Infection Prevention, St Louis, Missouri [K.M.M.])
David K. Warren
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
*
Address correspondence to Abigail L. Carlson, MD, Washington University School of Medicine, 4523 Clayton Ave, Campus Box 8051, St Louis, MO 63110 ([email protected]).

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe the frequency of urine cultures performed in inpatients without additional testing for pyuria

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study

SETTING

A 1,250-bed academic tertiary referral center

PATIENTS

Hospitalized adults

METHODS

This study included urine cultures drawn on 4 medical and 2 surgical wards from 2009 to 2013 and in the medical and surgical intensive care units (ICUs) from 2012 to 2013. Patient and laboratory data were abstracted from the hospital’s medical informatics database. We identified catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) in the ICUs by routine infection prevention surveillance. Cultures without urinalysis or urine microscopy were defined as “isolated.” The primary outcome was the proportion of isolated urine cultures obtained. We used multivariable logistic regression to assess predictors of isolated cultures.

RESULTS

During the study period, 14,743 urine cultures were obtained (63.5 cultures per 1,000 patient days) during 11,820 patient admissions. Of these, 2,973 cultures (20.2%) were isolated cultures. Of the 61 CAUTIs identified, 31 (50.8%) were identified by an isolated culture. Predictors for having an isolated culture included male gender (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.22; 95%; confidence interval [CI], 1.11–1.35], urinary catheterization (aOR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.89–2.46), ICU admission (medical ICU aOR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.47–2.00; surgical ICU aOR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.51–2.19), and obtaining the urine culture ≥1 calendar day after admission (1–7 days aOR, 1.91; 95% CI. 1.71–2.12; >7 days after admission aOR, 2.81; 95% CI, 2.37–3.34).

CONCLUSIONS

Isolated urine cultures are common in hospitalized patients, particularly in patients with urinary catheters and those in ICUs. Interventions targeting inpatient culturing practices may improve the diagnosis of urinary tract infections.

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:455–460

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
© 2017 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

PREVIOUS PRESENTATION: Presented in part as Abstract no. 7155 at the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America Spring 2015 Conference in Orlando, Florida, on May 16, 2015.

References

REFERENCES

1. Hooton, TM, Bradley, SF, Cardenas, DD, et al. Diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of catheter-associated urinary tract infection in adults: 2009 international clinical practice guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2010;50:625663.Google Scholar
2. Esclarín de Ruz, A, García Leoni, E, Herruzo Cabrera, R. Epidemiology and risk factors for urinary tract infection in patients with spinal cord injury. J Urol 2000;164:12851289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Warren, JW, Tenney, JH, Hoopes, JM, Muncie, HL, Anthony, WC. A prospective microbiologic study of bacteriuria in patients with chronic indwelling urethral catheters. J Infect Dis 1982;146:719723.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Leis, JA, Rebick, GW, Daneman, N, et al. Reducing antimicrobial therapy for asymptomatic bacteriuria among noncatheterized inpatients: a proof-of-concept study. Clin Infect Dis 2014;58:980983.Google Scholar
5. Semeniuk, H, Church, D. Evaluation of the leukocyte esterase and nitrite urine dipstick screening tests for detection of bacteriuria in women with suspected uncomplicated urinary tract infections. J Clin Microbiol 1999;37:30513052.Google Scholar
6. Oneson, R, Groschel, DH. Leukocyte esterase activity and nitrite test as a rapid screen for significant bacteriuria. Am J Clin Pathol 1985;83:8487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Nicolle, LE, Bradley, S, Colgan, R, Rice, JC, Schaeffer, A, Hooton, TM. Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria in adults. Clin Infect Dis 2005;40:643654.Google Scholar
8. Wilson, ML, Gaido, L. Laboratory diagnosis of urinary tract infections in adult patients. Clin Infect Dis 2004;38:11501158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Fahey, T, Webb, E, Montgomery, AA, Heyderman, RS. Clinical management of urinary tract infection in women: a prospective cohort study. Fam Pract 2003;20:16.Google Scholar
10. Chiu, J, Thompson, GW, Austin, TW, et al. Antibiotic prescribing practices for catheter urine culture results. Can J Hosp Pharm 2013;66:1320.Google Scholar
11. Sobel, JD, Kaye, D. Urinary tract infections. In: Bennett JE, Dolin R, Blaser MJ, eds. Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett’s Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases. 8th ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 2015:886913.Google Scholar
12. Dalen, DM, Zvonar, RK, Jessamine, PG. An evaluation of the management of asymptomatic catheter-associated bacteriuria and candiduria at The Ottawa Hospital. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol 2005;16:166170.Google Scholar
13. Al-Qas Hanna, F, Sambirska, O, Iyer, S, Szpunar, S, Fakih, MG. Clinician practice and the National Healthcare Safety Network definition for the diagnosis of catheter-associated urinary tract infection. Am J Infect Control 2013;41:11731177.Google Scholar
14. Trautner, BW, Patterson, JE, Petersen, NJ, et al. Quality gaps in documenting urinary catheter use and infectious outcomes. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013;34:793799.Google Scholar
15. Catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) event. NHSN Patient Safety Manual 2012. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/pdfs/validation/2012/psc-maunal-01-12-valid.pdf. Published 2012. Accessed December 8, 2015.Google Scholar
16. Catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) event. July 2013 CDC/NHSN Protocol Clarifications. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/pdfs/validation/2013/pscmanual_july2013.pdf. Published 2013. Accessed December 8, 2015.Google Scholar
17. Trautner, BW, Grigoryan, L, Petersen, NJ, et al. Effectiveness of an antimicrobial stewardship approach for urinary catheter-associated asymptomatic bacteriuria. JAMA Intern Med 2015;175:11201127.Google Scholar
18. Sarg, M, Waldrop, GE, Beier, MA, et al. Impact of changes in urine culture ordering practice on antimicrobial utilization in intensive care units at an academic medical center. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;37:448454.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Carlson supplementary material

Table S1

Download Carlson supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 29.4 KB