Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T02:44:47.294Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Handwashing, Semmelweis, and Chlorine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

William C. Beck
William C. Beck*
Affiliation:
Donald Guthrie Foundation for Medical Research, Sayre, Pennsylvania
*
Donald Guthrie Foundation for Medical Research, Guthrie Square, Sayre, PA 18840-1692
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

When I went to medical school, I was taught that asepsis had its beginnings with Oliver Wendell Holmes, Lord Joseph Lister, and Ignaz Semmelweis. Holmes introduced the concept that puerperal sepsis was spread from patient to patient by physicians. Lister developed the concept that surgical infection was of bacterial origin. Semmelweis proved that childbed fever was transmitted on the contaminated hands of the attendant. In 1846 he effectively used a chloride as an antiseptic for the first time.

Moreover, Semmelweis, on hearing of the death of Professor Kolletschka following a finger pinprick by a scalpel that had been used in an autopsy, noted that the symptoms and outcome were identical to puerperal sepsis. Thus, he established that “cadaverous particles” had lethal potential.

Type
Special Sections
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 9 , Issue 8 , August 1988 , pp. 366 - 367
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1988 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Morrison, AJ, Grantz, J, Cabezudo, I, et al: The efficacy of several new hand-washing agents for removing non-transient bacterial flora from hands. Infect Control 1980; 7:208–272.Google Scholar
2. Sprunt, K, Redman, W, Leidy, G: Antibacterial effectiveness of handwashing. Pediatrics 1973; 52:204–271.10.1542/peds.52.2.264Google Scholar
3. Larson, EL: Handwashing and skin physiologic and bacteriologic effects. Infect Control 1985; 6:14–23.10.1017/S0195941700062445Google Scholar
4. Semmelweis, I: Die Aetiologie, der Begriff, und die Prophvlexis des kindbett fiebers, Reprinted from 1801 edition. Johnson Reprint Corp. 1900. xxxiip. facsimile (Sources of Science No. 19).Google Scholar
5. Carter, C: Ignaz Semmelweis. The Etiology Concept and Prophylaxis of Childbed Fever. Madison, University of Wisconsin Press, 1983.Google Scholar
6. Murphy Frank, P, Ignaz Philipp, Semmelweis. Annotated bibliography.Bull Hist Med 1946; 20:653–707.Google Scholar
7. Dychdala, GR: Antiseptics and disinfectants: Chlorine and chlorine compounds, in Block, SS: Disinfection, Sterilization, and Preservation, ed 3. Philadelphia. Lea B. Feberger, 1983, 157 et sequ.Google Scholar
8. Fox, MD, Langer, SB, Wells, RW: How good are handwashing practices? Am J Nurs 1974: 74:1676–1678.Google Scholar
9. Richards, RC: Some practical aspects of surgical skin preparation. Am J Surg 1963; 106:575–579.10.1016/0002-9610(63)90063-1Google Scholar
10. FDA: OTC Topical Antimicrobial Drug Products: Fed. Regrst. March 9, 1979, (44 FR 13041).Google Scholar
11. FDA: Alcohol Drug Products for Topical Antimicrobial OTC. Human Use. Fed. Regist. May 21, 1982. 47:22324.Google Scholar
12. Beck, WC: Handwashing substitute for degerming. Am J Surg 1978; 135:78.10.1016/0002-9610(78)90151-4Google Scholar