Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T18:25:13.503Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Estimation of the Cumulative Incidence of Hospital-Acquired Bacteremia From Prevalence Data: A Formula

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

Houssein Gbaguidi Haore ,
Arno Muller ,
Daniel Talon  and
Xavier Bertrand
Houssein Gbaguidi Haore
Affiliation:
Service d'Hygiène Hospitalière et d'Epidémiologie Moléculaire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Jean Minjoz, Besançon, France
Arno Muller
Affiliation:
Service d'Hygiène Hospitalière et d'Epidémiologie Moléculaire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Jean Minjoz, Besançon, France
Daniel Talon
Affiliation:
Service d'Hygiène Hospitalière et d'Epidémiologie Moléculaire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Jean Minjoz, Besançon, France
Xavier Bertrand*
Affiliation:
Service d'Hygiène Hospitalière et d'Epidémiologie Moléculaire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Jean Minjoz, Besançon, France
*
Service d'Hygiène Hospitalière et d'Epidémiologie Moléculaire, CHU Jean Minjoz, 25030 Besançon, France[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We evaluated the validity of the formula of Rhame and Sudderth to estimate the cumulative incidence of nosocomial bacteremia from prevalence studies. The observed cumulative incidence was threefold higher than the calculated cumulative incidence. We do not recommend converting prevalence into incidence data for nosocomial bloodstream infections.

Type
Concise Communications
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 26 , Issue 4 , April 2005 , pp. 415 - 417
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Jarvis, WR. Selected aspects of the socioeconomic impact of nosocomial infections: morbidity, mortality, cost, and prevention. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1996;17:552–557.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Gastmeier, P, Brauer, H, Sohr, D, et al.Converting incidence and prevalence data of nosocomial infections: results from eight hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2001;22:31–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Delgado-Rodriguez, M, Cueto Espinar, A, Rodriguez-Contreras Pelayo, R, Galvez Vargas, R. A practical application of Rhame and Sudderth's formula on nosocomial infection surveillance. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 1987;35:482–487.Google Scholar
4.Graves, N, Nicholls, TM, Wong, CG, Morris, AJ. The prevalence and estimates of the cumulative incidence of hospital-acquired infections among patients admitted to Auckland District Health Board Hospitals in New Zealand. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2003;24:56–61.Google Scholar
5.National Technical Committee of Nosocomial Infections. 100 Recommendations for the Surveillance and Control of Nosocomial Infections, ed. 2. Paris: French Ministry of Health; 1999.Google Scholar
6.Garner, JS, Jarvis, WR, Emori, TG, Horan, TC, Hughes, JM. CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988. Am J Infect Control 1988;16:28–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Brariger, B, Bussy-Malgrange, V, Carbonne, A, et al.Nosocomial bacteremia in France: surveillance data of the coordinating centres for nosocomial infection control. Bulletin Epidémiologique Hebdomadaire 2001;50.Google Scholar
8.The Microbiology Surveillance Network of Northern France. Surveillance of nosocomial bacteremia from 1994 to 1996. Bulletin Epidémiologique Hebdomadaire 2000;18.Google Scholar
9.Maugat, S, Carbonne, A, Astagneau, P. Significant reduction of nosocomial infections: stratified analysis of prevalence national studies performed in 1996 and 2001 in French north interegion. Pathol Biol 2003;51:483–489.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed