Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T10:54:04.554Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Efficacy of Multiple Influenza Vaccine Delivery Systems in a Single Facility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Anthony A. Donato*
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, Pennsylvania State University Hershey School of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania Reading Hospital and Medical Center, West Reading, Pennsylvania
Lisa M. Motz
Affiliation:
Reading Hospital and Medical Center, West Reading, Pennsylvania Department of Internal Medicine, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Gregory Wilson
Affiliation:
University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas
Benjamin J. Lloyd
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, Pennsylvania State University Hershey School of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania Reading Hospital and Medical Center, West Reading, Pennsylvania
*
Reading Hospital and Medical Center, 6th St. and Spruce St., West Reading, PA 19612 ([email protected])

Abstract

We retrospectively investigated different inpatient influenza delivery strategies used during 3 consecutive years at a single institution. Vaccination rates were 3% for a physician reminder system, 21% for a manual standing order program, and 43% for a manual standing order program with a provider education program.

Type
Concise Communication
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Harper, SA, Fukuda, K, Uyeki, TM, Cox, NJ, Bridges, CB. Prevention and control of influenza: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep 2004;53(RR-6):140.Google ScholarPubMed
2.Dexter, PR, Perkins, SM, Maharry, KS, Jones, K, McDonald, CJ. Inpatient computer-based standing orders vs physician reminders to increase influenza and pneumococcal vaccination rates: a randomized trial. JAMA 2004;292:23662371.Google Scholar
3.Ash, JS, Gorman, PN, Seshadri, V, et al. Computerized physician order entry in US hospitals: results of a 2002 survey. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004;11:9599.Google Scholar
4.Winston, CA, Lindley, MC, Wortley, PM. Lessons learned from inpatient vaccination in Michigan. Am J Med Qual 2006;21:125133.Google Scholar
5.Slobodkin, D, Kitlas, JL, Zielske, PG. A test of the feasibility of pneumococcal vaccination in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 1999;6:724727.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Rhew, DC, Glassman, PA, Goetz, MB. Improving pneumococcal vaccine rates: nurse protocols versus clinical reminders. J Gen Intern Med 1999;14:351356.Google Scholar
7.Bloom, HG, Wheeler, DA, Linn, J. A managed care organization's attempt to increase influenza and pneumococcal immunizations for older adults in an acute care setting. J Am Geriatr Soc 1999;47:106110.Google Scholar
8.Crouse, BJ, Nichol, K, Peterson, DC, Grimm, MB. Hospital-based strategies for improving influenza vaccination rates. J Earn Pract 1994;38:258261.Google ScholarPubMed
9.Nichol, KL, Hauge, M. Influenza vaccination of healthcare workers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1997;18:189194.Google Scholar
10.Hershey, CO, Karuza, J. Delivery of vaccines to adults: correlations with physician knowledge and patient variables. Am J Med Qual 1997;12:143150.Google Scholar