Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T19:19:31.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why Is It So Hard to Apply Professional Selection Methods in Business Practice?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Beata Chorągwicka  and
Barbara Janta
Beata Chorągwicka*
Affiliation:
University of Santiago de Compostela
Barbara Janta
Affiliation:
RAND Europe
*
E-mail: [email protected] or [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , September 2008 , pp. 355 - 358
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2008 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Campus Sur, 15872 Santiago, Spain or RAND Europe, Westbrook Centre, Milton Road, Cambridge CB4 1YG, United Kingdom

The first author of the article is a Spanish Ministry of Education and Science grant holder for PhD students (FPU, AP2005-3807)

References

Anderson, N. R. (1992). Eight decades of employment interview research: A retrospective meta-review and prospective commentary. European Work and Organizational Psychologist, 2, 1–32.Google Scholar
Boletín Oficial de País Vasco (2002, March 22). Resolución de 26 de febrero de 2002 [Resolution of February 26th, 2002]. Retrieved February 29, 2008, from www.euskadi.net Google Scholar
Boudreau, J. W. (1983). Economic considerations in estimating the utility of human resource productivity improvement programs. Personnel Psychology, 36, 551–576.Google Scholar
Boudreau, J. W. (1991). Utility analysis for decisions in human resource management. In Dunnette, M. D. & Hough, L. M. (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 621–745). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Boudreau, J. W., & Ramstad, P. M. (2003). Strategic I/O psychology and utility analysis. In Borman, W., Klimoski, R., & Ilgen, D. (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 193–221). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Brogden, H. E. (1949). When testing pays off. Personnel Psychology, 2, 171–183.10.1111/j.1744-6570.1949.tb01397.xGoogle Scholar
Campion, M. A., Palmer, D. K, & Campion, J. E. (1997). A review of structure in the selection interview. Personnel Psychology, 50, 1–64.10.1111/j.1744-6570.1997.tb00709.xGoogle Scholar
Cascio, W. F. (1987). Costing human resources: The financial impact of behavior in organizations. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western College.Google Scholar
Cronbach, L. J., & Gleser, C. (1965). Psychological tests and personnel decisions (2nd ed.). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Eurostat. (2007). European business. Fact and figures. 2007 edition. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Retrieved February 22, 2008, from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat Google Scholar
Fitz-enz, J. (1995). How to measure human resources management. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Highhouse, S. (2008). Stubborn reliance on intuition and subjectivity in employee selection. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1, 333–342.Google Scholar
Huffcutt, A. I., & Arthur, W. Jr. (1994). Hunter & Hunter (1984) revisited: Interview validity for entry-level jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 184–190.10.1037/0021-9010.79.2.184Google Scholar
McDaniel, M. A., Whetzel, D. L., Schmidt, F. L., & Maurer, S. D. (1994). The validity of employment interviews: a comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 599–616.10.1037/0021-9010.79.4.599Google Scholar
Muchinsky, P. M. (2004). When the psychometrics of test development meets organizational realities: A conceptual framework for organizational change, examples, and recommendations. Personnel Psychology, 57, 175–209.Google Scholar
Ones, D. S., Dilchert, S., Viswesvaran, C., & Judge, T. A. (2007). In support of personality assessment in organizational settings. Personnel Psychology, 60, 995–1027.Google Scholar
Salgado, J. (2007). Análisis de utilidad económica de la entrevista conductual estructurada en la selección de personal de la Administración General de País Vasco [Utility analysis of the structured behavioral interview within the selection of personnel for the General Administration of the Basque Country]. Revista de Psicología de Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 23, 149–154.Google Scholar
Salgado, J. F., Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (2001). Predictors used for personnel selection. In Anderson, N., Ones, D. S., Sinangil, H. K., & Viswesvaran, C. (Eds.), Handbook of industrial, work, and organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 165–199). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262–274.Google Scholar