We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
Brogden, H. (1949). A new coefficient: Application to biserial correlation and to estimation of selective efficiency. Psychometrika, 14(3), 169–182. doi: 10.1007/bf02289151Google Scholar
Klehe, U. C. (2004). Choosing how to choose: Institutional pressures affecting the adoption of personnel selection procedures. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12(4), 327–342. doi: 10.1111/j.0965-075X.2004.00288.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
König, C. J., Bösch, F., Reshef, A., & Winkler, S. (2013). Human resource managers' attitudes toward utility analysis: An extended and refined update from Switzerland. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 12(3), 152–156. doi: 10.1027/1866-5888/a000090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macan, T., & Highhouse, S. (1994). Communicating the utility of human resource activities: A survey of I/O and HR professionals. Journal of Business and Psychology, 8(4), 425–436. doi: 10.1007/bf02230958Google Scholar
Selden, D. R. (2010). The effects of staff turnover on psychiatric rehabilitation programs. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 34(1), 71–73. doi: 10.2975/34.1.2010.71.73Google Scholar
Tziner, A., Fein, E. C., & Birati, A. (2014). Tempering hard times: Integrating well-being metrics into utility analysis. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 7(4), 554–568.Google Scholar