Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:02:06.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Corporate University: A Systems Thinking Situating Senior Leader Assessment and Development in Context to Enhance Organizational Viability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Lihui Zhang*
Affiliation:
Department of Management, John Molson School of Business, Concordia University
Kathleen Boies
Affiliation:
Department of Management, John Molson School of Business, Concordia University
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Lihui Zhang, Department of Management, John Molson School of Business, Concordia University, 1455 de Maisonneuve Blvd. W., Montréal H3G 1M8, Québec, Canada. E-mail: [email protected]

Extract

Reynolds, McCauley, Tsacoumis, and the Jeanneret Symposium Participants (2018) present outcomes of the 2-day Jeanneret Symposium describing the state of the science and practice related to the assessment and development of senior leaders. They call for cross-disciplinary and/or organization-level research that examines “how organizations mature their assessment and development practices toward an integrated system embedded in a development culture” (p. 646). The purpose of this commentary is to answer this call and add to their work by proposing a systems thinking framework of organizational development where a corporate university plays a pivotal role.

Type
Commentaries
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Becker, B. E., & Huselid, M. (2006). Strategic human resources management: Where do we go from here? Journal of Management, 32 (6), 898925. doi: 10.1177/0149206306293668Google Scholar
Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W., & White, R. E. (1999). An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review, 24 (3), 522537. doi: 10.2307/259140Google Scholar
Edmondson, A. C. (2002). The local and variegated nature of learning in organizations: A group-level perspective. Organization Science, 13 (2), 128146. doi:10.1287/orsc.13.2.128.530Google Scholar
Gulati, R., Nohria, N., & Zaheer, A. (2000). Strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 21 (3), 203215. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3%3C203::AID-SMJ102%3E3.0.CO;2-KGoogle Scholar
Parmigiani, A., & Rivera-Santos, M. (2011). Clearing a path through the forest: A meta-review of interorganizational relationships. Journal of Management, 37 (4), 11081136. doi: 10.1177/0149206311407507Google Scholar
Plompen, M. (2005). Innovative corporate learning: Excellent management development practice in Europe. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230288799Google Scholar
Reynolds, D. H., McCauley, C. D., Tsacoumis, S. & the Jeanneret Symposium participants. (2018). A critical evaluation of the state of assessment and development for senior leaders. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 11 (4), 630652.Google Scholar
Rio, A. (2018, May). The future of the corporate university. Chief Learning Officer, 17 (4), 3656. Retrieved from https://www.clomedia.com/2018/05/03/future-corporate-university/Google Scholar
Ryan, L., Prince, C., & Turner, P. (2015). The changing and developing role of the corporate university post-millennium. Industry and Higher Education, 29 (3): 167174. doi: 10.5367/ihe.2015.0256Google Scholar
Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40 (3), 437453. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1987.tb00609.xGoogle Scholar
Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and science of the learning organization. New York, NY: Currency Doubleday.Google Scholar
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18 (7), 509533. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7%3C509::AID-SMJ882%3E3.0.CO;2-ZGoogle Scholar