Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:19:30.912Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Legacy of Eugenics Underlies Racial-Group Comparisons in Intelligence Testing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Janet E. Helms
Janet E. Helms*
Affiliation:
Boston College
*
E-mail: [email protected], Address: Institute for the Study and Promotion of Race and Culture, Boston College, LSOE, 317 Campion, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , June 2012 , pp. 176 - 179
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berry, C. M., Clark, M., & McClure, T. K. (2011). Racial/ethnic differences in the criterion-related validity of cognitive ability tests: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 881–906.Google Scholar
Blanton, C. K. (2000). “They cannot master abstractions, but they can often be made efficient workers”: Race and class in the intelligence testing of Mexican Americans and African Americans in Texas during the 1920s. Social Science Quarterly, 81, 1014–1026.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B. (1940). A culture free intelligence test, Part I. Journal of Educational Psychology, 31, 161–179.Google Scholar
Galton, F. (1869). Hereditary genius. London, England: Macmillan. Google Scholar
Helms, J. E. (2006). Fairness is not validity or cultural bias in racial-group assessment: A quantitative perspective. American Psychologist, 61, 845–859.Google Scholar
Helms, J. E., Jernigan, M., & Mascher, J. (2005). The meaning of race in psychology and how to change it. American Psychologist, 60, 27–36.Google Scholar
Scherbaum, C. A., Goldstein, H. W., Yusko, K. P., Ryan, R., & Hanges, P. J. (2012). Intelligence 2.0: Reestablishing a research program on g in I–O psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5, 128–148.Google Scholar
Shields, S. A., & Bhatia, S. (2009). Darwin on race, gender, and culture. American Psychologist, 64, 111–119.Google Scholar
Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 69, 797–811.Google Scholar
Thorne, B. M., & Henley, T. B. (2005). Connections in the history and systems of psychology (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. Google Scholar
Valencia, R. R., & Suzuki, L. A. (2001). Intelligence testing and minority students: Foundations, performance factors, and assessment issues. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar