Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:50:30.316Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Casting a Wider Net: Recommendations for the Study of Broad Discrimination Experiences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Dana L. Joseph  and
Gregory J. Rousis
Dana L. Joseph*
Affiliation:
University of Central Florida
Gregory J. Rousis
Affiliation:
University of Central Florida
*
E-mail: [email protected], Address: Department of Psychology, University of Central Florida, 4000 Central Florida Blvd., Orlando, FL 32816
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the end, antiblack, antifemale, and all forms of discrimination are equivalent to the same thing—antihumanism.

–Shirley Chisholm (The first African American woman elected to Congress)

Ruggs et al. (2013) have provided an indispensable wake-up call to the organizational sciences as they argue that the field's previous research on employee discrimination experiences has failed to capture the full spectrum of discriminatory behaviors in the workplace. They posit that industrial and organizational psychologists have “gone fishing” in the field of discrimination research, a reference to our scholarly ignorance of the discrimination experienced by seven groups of marginalized employees (i.e., non-Black racial minorities, LGBT individuals, older workers, disabled individuals, overweight employees, religious minorities, and workers at risk of marital status discrimination). In doing so, Ruggs et al. have taken what we believe is a critical first step in advancing the field by assembling a discussion of (arguably) all discrimination experiences into a consolidated treatise on discrimination research.

Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , March 2013 , pp. 88 - 92
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84(5), 888–918.Google Scholar
Arthur, W., & Doverspike, D. (2005). Achieving diversity and reducing discrimination in the workplace through human resource management practices: Implications of research and theory for staffing, training, and rewarding performance. In Dipboye, R. L., & Colella, A. (Eds.), Discrimination at work (pp. 305–328). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Berdahl, J. L. (2007). Harassment based on sex: Protecting social status in the context of gender hierarchy. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 641–658.Google Scholar
Berdahl, J. L., & Moore, C. (2006). Workplace harassment: Double jeopardy for minority women. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2), 426–436.Google Scholar
Chen, G., Gully, S., & Eden, D. (2004). General self-efficacy and self-esteem: Toward theoretical and empirical distinction between correlated self-evaluations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 375–394.Google Scholar
Cronbach, L. J. (1956). Assessment of individual differences. Annual Review of Psychology, 7, 173–196.Google Scholar
Dipboye, R. L., & Colella, A. (2005). The dilemmas of workplace discrimination. In Dipboye, R. L., & Colella, A. (Eds.), Discrimination at work (pp. 425–462). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Edwards, J. R. (2001). Multidimensional constructs in organizational behavior research: An integrative analytical framework. Organizational Research Methods, 4(2), 144–192.Google Scholar
Harrison, D. A., Newman, D. A., & Roth, P. L. (2006). How important are job attitudes? Meta-analytic comparisons of integrative behavioral outcomes and time sequences. Academy of Management Journal, 49(2), 305–325.Google Scholar
Johns, G. (1998). Aggregation or aggravation? The relative merits of a broad withdrawal construct. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 453–462.Google Scholar
Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. (2001a). Relationship of core self-evaluations traits—self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability—with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 80–92.Google Scholar
Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. (2001b). A rose by any other name… Are self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, neuroticism, and locus of control indicators of a common construct?. In Roberts, B. W., & Hogan, R. (Eds.), Personality psychology in the workplace (pp. 93–118). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Judge, T. A., Locke, E. A., & Durham, C. C. (1997). The dispositional causes of job satisfaction: A core evaluations approach. Research in Organizational Behavior, 19, 151–188.Google Scholar
Newman, D. A., Joseph, D. L., & Hulin, C. L. (2010). Job attitudes and employee engagement: Considering the attitude “A-factor.” In Albrecht, S. (Ed.), Handbook of employee engagement. Cheltenham, England: Edwin Elgar.Google Scholar
Ones, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (1996). Bandwidth-fidelity dilemma in personality measurement for personnel selection. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 609–626.Google Scholar
Ormerod, A. J., Joseph, D. L., Weitzman, L. M., & Winterrowd, E. (2013). Career issues and challenges viewed through a feminist multicultural lens: Work-life interface and sexual harassment. In Enns, C. Z., & Williams, E. N. (Eds.), Handbook of feminist multicultural counseling psychology. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Raver, J. L., & Nishii, L. H. (2010). Once, twice, or three times as harmful? Ethnic harassment, gender harassment, and generalized workplace harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(2), 236–254.Google Scholar
Rospenda, K. M., & Richman, J. A. (2004). Harassment and discrimination. In Barling, J., Kelloway, E. K., & Frone, M. R. (Eds.), Handbook of work stress (pp. 149–188). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Ruggs, E. N., Law, C., Cox, C. B., Roehling, M. V., Wiener, R. L., Hebl, M. R., & Barron, L. (2013). Gone fishing: I-O psychologists' missed opportunities to understand marginalized employees' experiences with discrimination. Industrial Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 6, 39–60.Google Scholar