Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T13:46:57.971Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Response

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Nel Noddings
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

My response addresses a few technical problems raised by Card—the function of chains in extending caring, a constructivist interpretation of formal relations, a variation of reciprocity—and then concentrates on the major charges of unidirec' tionality and continued exploitation of women. Caring is not construed as an individual virtue that makes continuous demands on one party, but as a relational attribute. An ethic of caring is liberational rather than exploitative because the expectation is that all people, not just women, should act as carers.

Type
Review Symposium
Information
Hypatia , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , Spring 1990 , pp. 120 - 126
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Card, Claudia. 1990. Caring and evil. Hypaàa 5 (1): 101–108.Google Scholar
Hoagland, Sarah Lucia. 1990. Some concerns about Nel Noddings' Caring. Hypatia 5 (1): 109–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houston, Barbara. 1990. Caring and exploitation. Hypatia 5 (1): 115–119.10.1111/j.1527-2001.1990.tb00395.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huit, Richard E. Jr. 1979. On pedagogical caring. Educational Theory 29 (3): 237–244.Google Scholar
Noddings, Nel. 1984. Caring. Berkeley, CA: The University of California Press.Google Scholar
Noddings, Nel. 1989. Women and evil Berkeley, CA: The University of California Press.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan Möller. 1989. Reasoning and feeling in thinking about justice. Ethics 99(2): 229–249.10.1086/293064CrossRefGoogle Scholar