Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:42:37.497Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Response to Lesbian Ethics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Marilyn Frye
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Lesbian Ethics seems to address a need for an alternative to heteropatriarchal ethics. That need appears to have two suspect sources: a concept of agency which requires that agents know what is right; and a notion women may have that by being “good” we can escape the degraded status of females and achieve a status of citizeness, or honorary male. Instead of providing such an ethic, the book may show us how to live without it.

Type
Review Symposium
Information
Hypatia , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , Fall 1990 , pp. 132 - 137
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Daly, Mary. 1984. Gyn/Ecology: The metaethics of radical feminism. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Frye, Marilyn. N.d. Growing room. Circulated informally under the title, Ritual libations and point of explosion: More reflections on being white and feminist.Google Scholar
Hoagland, Sarah Lucia. 1988. Lesbian ethics: Toward new value. Palo Alto, CA: Institute of Lesbian Studies.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Miriam M. 1988. Strong mothers, weak wives. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Pratt, Minnie Bruce. 1984. Identity: Skin blood heart. In Yours m struggle: Three feminist perspectives on and‐Semitism and racism. Bulktn, Elly, Bruce Pratt, Minnie and Smith, Barbara, eds. Brooklyn: Long Haul Press.Google Scholar
Spelman, Elizabeth V. 1989. Inessential woman: Problems of exclusion in feminist thought. Boston: Beacon Press. P. 45–57.Google Scholar