Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T17:43:58.064Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A (Qualified) Defense of Liberal Feminism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Susan Wendell
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Liberal feminism is not committed to a number of philosophical positions for which it is frequently criticized, including abstract individualism, certain individualistic approaches to morality and society, valuing the mental/rational over the physical/emotional, and the traditional liberal way of drawing the line between the public and the private.

Moreover, liberal feminism's clearest political commitments, including equality of opportunity, are important to women's liberation and not necessarily incompatible with the goals of socialist and radical feminism.

Type
Articles
Information
Hypatia , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , Summer 1987 , pp. 65 - 93
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, Anita. 1983. Women and their privacy: What is at stake? In Beyond domination. See Gould 1983.Google Scholar
Bunch, Charlotte. 1981. The reform tool kit. In Building feminist theory, ed. The Quest Staff. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Ehrensaft, Diane. 1984. When women and men mother. In Mothering. See Trebilcot 1984.Google Scholar
Eisenstein, Zillah. 1981. The radical future of liberal feminism. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.Google Scholar
Gould, Carol C. 1983. Private rights and public virtues: Women, the family and democracy. In Beyond domination, ed. Gould, Carol C.Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1976. Feminism: Reform or revolution? In Women and philosophy, eds. Gould, Carol C. and Wartofsky, Marx W.New York: Putnam.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1983. Is gender a variable in conceptions of rationality? In Beyond domination. See Gould 1983.Google Scholar
Held, Virginia. 1984. The obligations of mothers and fathers. In Mothering. See Trebilcot 1984.Google Scholar
Jaggar, Alison M. 1983. Feminist politics and human nature. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld.Google Scholar
Jaggar, Alison M. and Rothenberg Struhl, Paula, eds. 1978. Feminist frameworks. New York: McGraw‐Hill.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1870. The subjection of women, New York: D. Appleton.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. [1861] 1957. Utilitarianism. New York: Bobbs‐Merrill.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1972. The later letters of John Stuart Mill 1848‐1873. ed. Mineka, F.E. and Lindley, D.N.Toronto: University of Toronto.10.3138/9781442654143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moulton, Janice and Rainone, Francine. 1983. Women's work and sex roles. In Beyond domination. See Gould 1983.Google Scholar
Olsen, Frances. 1983. The family and the market: A study of ideology and legal reform. Harvard Law Review 96 (7): 1497–1578.10.2307/1340916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1979. The problem of political obligation. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Polatnick, M. Rivka. 1984. Why men don't rear children: A power analysis. In Mothering. See Trebilcot 1984.Google Scholar
Rich, Adrienne. 1976. Of woman born. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Rowbotham, Sheila. 1979. Beyond the fragments. London: Islington Community Press.Google Scholar
Scheman, Naomi. 1983. Individualism and the objects of psychology. In Discovering reality, eds. Harding, Sandra and Hintikka, Merrill B.Boston: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Trebilcot, Joyce, ed. 1984. Mothering: Essays in feminist theory. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld.Google Scholar
Wendell, Susan D. 1976. The subjection of women today. Ph.D. diss., University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Wendell, Susan D. 1980. Discrimination, sex prejudice and affirmative action. Atlantis 6 (1) :.Google Scholar
Wendell, Susan D. 1983. Pornography and freedom of expression. In Pornography and censorship, eds. Copp, David and Wendell, Susan. Buffalo: Prometheus.Google Scholar
Wollstonecraft, Mary. [1833] 1967. A vindication of the rights of woman. New York: Norton.Google Scholar