Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T21:04:14.297Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The New Men's Studies: From Feminist Theory to Gender Scholarship

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2020

Harry Brod
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The paper situates the new field of men's studies in the context of the evolution of women's studies. It argues that men's studies’ distinctive feminist approach to men is a necessary complement to women's studies, citing paradigmatic examples of new perspectives. In tracing women's studies’ development, the paper argues that reconceptualizations of “gender” resolve tensions between much of women's studies’ non-essentialist empirical social science describing “sex roles” and much of feminist theory's essentialist celebrations of women's core selves.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 2 , Issue 1: Special Issue: Philosophy and Women Symposium , Winter 1987 , pp. 179 - 196
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

August, Eugene R. 1982. ‘Modern men,’ or, men's studies in the 80's. College English 44(6).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beauvoir, Simone de. 1974. The second sex. Trans. and ed. Parsh‐ley, H.M.New York: Vintage, (orig. 1952. N.Y.: Knopf.).Google Scholar
Bliss, Shepherd. 1980. Why graduate programs in psychology should offer courses on men. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, Jan. 1982. Now what are they up to? Men in the ‘men's movement’ In On the problem of men: Two feminist conferences, eds. Friedman, Scarlet and Sarah, Elizabeth. London: The Women's Press.Google Scholar
Brannon, Robert. 1976. The male sex role: Our culture's blueprint of manhood, and what it's done for us lately. In The forty‐nine percent majority: The male sex role, eds. David, Deborah S. and Brannon, Robert. Reading, Mass.: Addison‐Wesley.Google Scholar
Brod, Harry. 1984. Eros thanatized: Pornography and male sexuality.” Humanities in Society 7(1 and 2).Google Scholar
Brod, Harry. 1986. Why is this ‘men's studies’ different from all other ‘men's studies’? Journal of the National Association for Women Deans, Administrators, and Counselors 49(4).Google Scholar
Brod, Harry. 1987. Introduction, and the case for men's studies. In The making of masculinities: The new men's studies, ed. Brod, Harry. Boston: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Chafetz, Janet Saltzman. 1974. Masculine/feminine or human? Itasca, lll.: F.E. Peacock.Google Scholar
Coyner, Sandra. 1980. Women's studies as an academic discipline: Why and how to do it. In Theories of women's studies, eds. Bowles, Gloria and Duelli‐Klein, Renate. Berkeley: Women's Studies, University of Californa, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Doyle, James A. 1983. The male experience. Dubuque, Iowa: Wm. C. Brown.Google Scholar
Dubbert, Joe L. 1979. A man's place: Masculinity in transition. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice‐Hall.Google Scholar
Filene, Peter Gabriel. 1976. Him/her/self: Sex roles in modern America. New York: New American Library.Google Scholar
Franklin, Clyde W. II. 1984. The changing definition of masculinity. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerzon, Mark. 1982. A choice of heroes: The changing faces of American manhood. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a different voice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Herb. 1977. The hazards of being male: Surviving the myth of masculine privilege. New York: New American Library Signet.Google Scholar
Goodman, Ellen. 1981. The communication gap. In At large. New York: Summit.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra and Hintikka, Merill B. 1983. Introduction. Discovering reality: Feminist perspectives on epistemology, metaphysics, methodology and philosophy of science. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Jaggar, Alison. 1973-1974. Abortion and a woman's right to decide. The Philosophical Forum 1(2).Google Scholar
Keller, Evelyn Fox. 1985. Reflections on gender and science. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, David. 1981. Men, masculinity, and the process of sociological enquiry. In Doing feminist research, ed. Roberts, Helen. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Pleck, Elizabeth H. and Pleck, Joseph H. 1980. The American man. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice‐Hall.Google Scholar
Pleck, Joseph H. 1981. The myth of masculinity. Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Judith. 1981. Anthropology and the study of gender. In A feminist perspective in the academy: The difference it makes, eds. Langland, Elizabeth and Gove, Walter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Spender, Dale. 1981. Men's studies modified: The impact of feminism on the academic disciplines. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Stanley, Liz and Wise, Sue. 1983. Breaking out: Feminist consciousness and feminist research. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar