Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T08:32:20.292Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Linguistic Alterity and the Multiplicitous Self: Critical Phenomenologies in Latina Feminist Thought

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Abstract

Latina feminists like Gloria Anzaldúa and Mariana Ortega have developed anti‐essentialist accounts of selfhood that are responsive to the problem of alterity and hermeneutic alienation experienced by multiplicitous subjects, understood as those who must navigate between multiple cultural norms and often conflicting interpretive traditions (due to colonial legacies and intersectional oppressions). These accounts can be fortified by examining the sense of inarticulacy that arises from having to name conditions of existence undergirded by social and historical contradictions and ambiguities—especially under the experiential stress of gendered social violence, cultural trauma, and state terror. To address phenomenological accounts of “linguistic terrorism” and the role language plays in multiplicitous accounts of selfhood, I turn to a strategic reading of Nietzsche's existential conception of the self as a living multiplicity, and to his related account of the impoverishment of language. In doing so, I argue more generally that philosophies of agency that critique agential narratives of rupture, instability, and interpretive loss (as part of liberal emancipatory projects) often do so without sufficient attunement to the ways concepts of alterity and liminality operate in North–South contexts or Latina feminist thought. I end by highlighting the critical, decolonial impetus of these concepts as responses to cultural violence.

Type
Cluster on Latina Feminism
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anzaldúa, Gloria. 1987/2007. Borderlands/La frontera: The new mestiza. San Francisco: Aunt Lute Books.Google Scholar
Bierria, Alisa. 2014. Missing in action: Violence, power, and discerning agency. Hypatia 29 (1): 130–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1981. The dialogic imagination. Trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 2005. Giving an account of oneself. New York: Fordham University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canclini, Néstor García. 2005. Hybrid cultures: Strategies for entering and leaving modernity. Trans. Christopher Chiappari and Silvia L. López. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Cave, Damien. 2012. Wave of violence swallows more women in Juárez, Mexico. The New York Times, June 23.Google Scholar
de Certeau, Michel. 1988. The writing of history. Trans. Tom Conley. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1982. Discourse on language. In The archeology of knowledge. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans‐Georg. 1975. Truth and method. New York: Seabury Press.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1974/1984. Revolution in poetic language. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Emily S., ed. 2014. Living alterities. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Lugones, María. 1994. Purity, impurity and separation. Signs 19 (2): 458–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1997. Daybreak: Thoughts on the prejudices of morality. Trans. R. J. Hollingdale. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1999. The birth of tragedy and other writings. Ed. and trans. Raymond Geuss and Ronald Speirs. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 2003. Writings from the late notebooks. Trans. Kate Sturge. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 2009a. Writings from the early notebooks. Trans. Ladislaus Löb. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 2009b. The anti‐Christ, ecce homo, twilight of the idols, and other writings. Trans. Judith Norman. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ortega, Mariana. 2001. “New Mestizas”, “World‐travelers”, and “Dasein”: Phenomenology and the multi‐voiced, multi‐cultural self. Hypatia 16 (3): 129.Google Scholar
Ortega, Mariana. 2004. Exiled space, in‐between space: Existential spatiality in Ana Mendieta's Siluetas series. Philosophy & Geography 7 (1): 2541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortega, Mariana. 2008. Multiplicity, inbetweenness, and the question of assimilation. Southern Journal of Philosophy 46 (2): 6580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortega, Mariana. 2014. Hometactics: Self‐mapping, belonging, and the home question. In Living alterities, ed. Lee, Emily S.Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Ruíz, Elena Flores. 2011. Feminist border theory. In The Routledge international handbook of contemporary social and political theory, ed. Delanty, Gerard and Turner, Stephen. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Saldívar‐Hull, Sonia. 2007. Critical introduction. In Borderlands/La frontera: The new mestiza. San Francisco: Aunt Lute Books.Google Scholar
Schutte, Ofelia. 1984. Beyond nihilism: Nietzsche without masks. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schutte, Ofelia. 1998. Cultural alterity: Cross‐cultural communication and feminist theory in north–south contexts. Hypatia 13 (2): 5372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri. 1990. The post‐colonial critic: Interviews, strategies, dialogues, ed. Harasym, Sarah. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1996. Review of Will Kymlicka's Multicultural Citizenship. American Political Science Review 90 (2): 408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar