Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T00:52:29.721Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Feminist Love Studies—Editors' Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Special Issue: Feminist Love Studies
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barriteau, Eudine. 2012. Love and power. Cave Hill, Barbados: University of the West Indies Press.Google Scholar
Bartky, Sandra. 1990. Femininity and domination. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Berlant, Lauren. 2011. A properly political concept of love. Cultural Anthropology 26 (4): 683–91.10.1111/j.1548-1360.2011.01120.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, Eileen. 2015. Review of Socrates and Diotima, by Andrea Nye. Hypatia Reviews Online. http://hypatiaphilosophy.org/HRO/search/content/clements (accessed September 11, 2016).Google Scholar
Davis, Dawn Rae. 2002. (Love is) the ability of not knowing. Hypatia 17 (2): 145–61.10.1111/j.1527-2001.2002.tb00771.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, Ann. 1991. Sexual democracy. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Ann. Forthcoming. Love as a political force. In The radicalism of romantic love, ed. Grossi, Renata and West, David. London: Ashgate Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Ann Forthcoming. Alienation in romantic love. In Feminism and the power of love, ed. García Andrade, Adriana, Gunnarsson, Lena, and Jónasdóttir, Anna G.Routledge.Google Scholar
Adriana, García Andrade, Gunnarsson, Lena, and Jónasdóttir, Anna, eds. Forthcoming. Feminism and the power of love. Routledge.Google Scholar
Godart, Caroline. 2016. The dimensions of difference. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Gunnarsson, Lena. 2014. The contradictions of love. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315851464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardt, Michael, and Negri, Antonio. 2005. Multitude. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
hooks, bell. 2000. All about love. New York: William Morrow and Co.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1984. An ethics of sexual difference. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1996. I love to you. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jaggar, Alison. 1989. Love and knowledge. In Gender/Body/Knowledge, ed. Jaggar, Alison M. and Bordo, Susan R.New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Jónasdóttir, Anna. 1994. Why women are oppressed. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Jónasdóttir, Anna. 2014. A (re)new (ed) field of feminist knowledge interests. In Love: A question for feminism in the twenty‐first century, ed. Jónasdóttir, Anna G. and Ferguson, Ann. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jónasdóttir, Anna, and Ferguson, Ann, eds. 2014. Love: A question for feminism in the twenty‐first century. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jones, Kathleen B. 2000. Living between danger and love. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Lorde, Audre. 1984. The erotic as power. In Sister outsider. Trumansburg, N.Y.: The Crossing Press.Google Scholar
McLaren, Margaret. Review of Planetary Loves, ed. Moore, Stephen D. and Rivera, Mayra. Hypatia Reviews Online. http://hypatiaphilosophy.org/HRO/content/planetary-loves-spivak-postcoloniality-and-theology (accessed September 11, 2016).Google Scholar
Moreno‐Marimon, Montserrat, and Sastre, Genoveva. 2010. Cómo construimos universos. Barcelona: Gedisa Press.Google Scholar
Oliver, Kelly. 2015. Earth and world. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortega, Mariana. 2006. Being lovingly, knowingly ignorantly. Hypatia 21 (3): 5674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peña‐Guzmán, David. Review of Cut of the real, by Katarina Kolosova. Hypatia Reviews Online. http://hypatiaphilosophy.org/HRO/reviews/content/285 (accessed September 11, 2016).Google Scholar
TallBear, Kim. Review of Undoing Monogamy, by Angela Willey. Hypatia Reviews Online. http://hypatiaphilosophy.org/HRO/reviews/content/286 (accessed September 11, 2016).Google Scholar
Toye, Margaret. E. 2002. Cyborg revolutions. PhD dissertation, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
Toye, Margaret. E. 2010. Towards a poethics of love. Feminist Theory 11 (1): 3955.10.1177/1464700109355212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toye, Margaret. E. Forthcoming. Love as affective energy. In Feminism and the power of love, ed. García Andrade, Adriana, Gunnarsson, Lena, and Jónasdóttir, Anna. Routledge.Google Scholar