Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:26:26.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“The Only Diabolical Thing About Women…”: Luce Irigaray on Divinity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Penelope Deutscher
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Luce Irigaray's argument that women need a feminine divine is placed in the context of her analyses of the interconnection between man's appropriation of woman as his “negative alter ego” and his identification with the impossible ego ideal represented by the figure of God. As an alternative, the “feminine divine” is conceived as a realm with which women would be continuous. It would allow mediation between humans, and interrupt cannibalizing appropriations of the other.

Type
Embodying Divinities
Information
Hypatia , Volume 9 , Issue 4: Special Issue: Feminist Philosophy of Religion , Fall 1994 , pp. 88 - 111
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berg, Elizabeth. 1982. The third woman. Diacritics 12(2): 11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, Carolyn. 1981. Irigaray through the looking glass. Feminist Studies 7(2): 288–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1993. Bodies that matter. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. [1972] 1981. Dissemination. Trans. Johnson, Barbara. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1982. Choreographies. Diacritics 12(Summer): 66–76.Google Scholar
Deutscher, Penelope. 1992. The evanescence of masculinity: Deferral in Saint Augustine's Confessions and some thoughts on its bearing on the sex/gender debate. Australian Feminist Studies 15(Autumn): 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. [193233] 1973. Femininity. In New introductory lectures on psychoanalysis. Trans. Strachey, James. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Fuss, Diana. 1990. Essentially speaking. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gallop, Jane. 1982. Feminism and psychoanalysis: The daughter's seduction. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gatens, Moira. 1991. Feminism and philosophy: Perspectives on difference and equality. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth. 1986. Irigaray and the divine. Sydney: Local Consumption Publications.Google Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth. 1989. Sexual subversions: Three French feminists. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth. 1990. A note on essentialism and difference. In Feminist knowledge: Critique and construct, ed. Gunew, Sneja. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. [1974] 1985a. Speculum of the other woman. Trans. Gill, Gillian C.Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1985b [1977]. This sex which is not one. Trans. Porter, Catherine with Burke, Carolyn. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. [1980] 1991a. Marine lover of Friedrich Nietzsche. Trans. Gill, Gillian C.New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1991b. The Irigaray reader. ed. Whitford, Margaret. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1992. J'aime â toi. Paris: Grasset.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. [1987] 1993a. Sexes and genealogies. Trans. Gill, Gillian C.New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. [1984] 1993b. An ethics of sexual difference. Trans. Burke, Carolyn and Gill, Gillian C.Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Joy, Morny. 1990. Equality or divinity—A false dichotomy? Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion 6(1): 9–24.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Genevieve. 1984. The man of reason: ‘Male’ and ‘Female’ in Western philosophy. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
McGowan, John. 1991. Postmodernism and its critics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Moi, Toril. 1985. Sexual/textual politics: Feminist literary theory. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Nye, Andrea. 1988. Feminist theory and the philosophies of man. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Plato, . 1961. The collected dialogues of Plato. ed. Hamilton, Edith and Cairns, Huntington. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Plaza, Monique. 1978. “Phaliomorphic power” and the psychology of “woman.” Ideology and Consciousness 4(Autumn): 57–76.Google Scholar
Schutte, Ofelia. 1991. Irigaray on the problem of subjectivity. Hypatia 6(2): 64–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitford, Margaret. 1991. Luce Irigaray: Philosophy in the feminine. London: Routledge.Google Scholar