Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:34:54.998Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Kierkegaard and the Feminine Self

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Abstract

Kierkegaard shows two contrary attitudes to woman and the feminine: misogyny and celebration. The Kierkegaardian structure of selfhood, because combined with a hierarchical assumption about the relative value of certain human characteristics, and their identification as male or female, argues that woman is a lesser self. Consequently, the claim that the Kierkegaardian ideal of selfhood is androgynist is rejected, though it is the latter assumptions alone that force this conclusion.

Type
Embodying Subjectivities
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bertung, Birgit. 1989. Yes, a woman can exist. In Kierkegaard conferences 1: Kierkegaard, poet of existence. Copenhagen: C. A. Reitzel.Google Scholar
Garside, Christine. 1971. Can a woman be good in the same way as a man? Dialogue 10, 534–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren. [1850] 1941. An edifying discourse. In Training in Christianity. Trans. Lowrie, Walter. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren. [1847] 1956. Purity of heart is to will one thing. Trans. Steere, Douglas V.New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren. [1847] 1962. Works of love. Trans. Hong, Howard V. and Hong, Edna H.New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren. 1967-78. Journals and papers. Trans. Hong, Howard V. and Hong, Edna H.Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren. [1855] 1968. The instant. In Attack upon “Christendom.” Trans. Lowrie, Walter. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren. [1849] 1971. Three discourses at the communion on Fridays. In Chiristian discourses. Trans. Lowrie, Walter. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren. [1846] 1978. Two ages. Trans. Hong, Howard V. and Hong, Edna H.Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren. [1844] 1980a. The concept of anxiety. Trans. Thomte, Reidar. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren. [1849] 1980b. The sickness unto death. Trans. Hong, Howard V. and Hong, Edna H.Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren. [1843] 1983. Repetition. Trans. Hong, Howard V. and Hong, Edna H.Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren. [1843] 1987. Either/Or. Vols. 1 and 2. Trans. Hong, Howard V. and Hong, Edna H.Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren. [1845] 1988. Stages on life's way. Trans. Hong, Howard V. and Hong, Edna H.Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren. [1851] 1990. For self‐examination. Trans. Hong, Howard V. and Hong, Edna H.Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren. [1850] 1991. Practice in Christianity. Trans. Hong, Howard V. and Hong, Edna H.Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren. [1846] 1992. Concluding unscientific postscript. Trans. Hong, Howard V. and Hong, Edna H.Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Walsh, Sylvia I. 1987. On “feminine” and “masculine” forms of despair. In International Kierkegaard Commentary: The Sickness Unto Death, ed. Perkins, Robert L.Macon Georgia: Mercer University Press.Google Scholar
Watkin, Julia. 1991. The logic of Søren Kierkegaard's misogyny, 1854‐1855. Kierkegaardiana 15, 8292.Google Scholar