Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:29:41.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Hidden Host: Irigaray and Diotima at Plato's Symposium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Andrea Nye
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Irigaray's reading of Plato's Symposium in Ethique de la difference sexuelle illustrates both the advantages and the limits of her textual practise. Irigaray's attentive listening to the text allows Diotima's voice to emerge from an overlay of Platonic scholarship. But both the ahistorical nature of that listening and Irigaray's assumption of feminine marginality also make her a party to Plato's sabotage of Diotima's philosophy. Understood in historical context, Diotima is not an anomaly in Platonic discourse, but the hidden host of Plato's banquet, speaking for a pre-Socratic world view against which classical Greek thought is asserted. Understood in historical context, Plato is not the authoritative founder of Western thought against whom only marginal skirmishes can be mounted, but a rebellious student who manages to transform Diotima's complex teaching on personal identity, immortality, and love into the sterile simplicities of logical form.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 3 , Issue 3: Special Issue: French Feminist Philosophy , Winter 1988 , pp. 45 - 61
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bois, Page du. 1985. Phallocentrism and its Subversion in Plato's Phaedrus. Arethusa 18: 91–103.Google Scholar
Bury, R.G. 1932. The Symposium of Plato. Cambridge: W. Heffer and Sons.Google Scholar
Clément, Catherine. 1981. Vies et légendes de Jacques Lacon. Paris: B. Grasset.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1976. Of Grammatobgy, Trans. G.C. Spivak. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1978. Spurs: Nietzche's Styles. Trans, Barbara Harlow. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1981. Dissemination. Trans. Barbara Johnson. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dietrich, B.C. 1974. The Origins of Greek Religion. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110840872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dover, K.J. 1978. Greek Homosexuality. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Flax, Jane. 1980. Mother‐Daughter Relationships: Psychodynamics, Politics and Philosophy, in The Future of Difference, ed. Eisenstein, Hester and Jardine, Allice. Boston: G. K. Hall.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. 1953. Femininity. The Standard Edition of the Complete PSJI‐chological Works. XXI. London: Hogarth.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1974. Speculum de l'autre femme. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1977. Ce sexe qui n'est pas un. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1984. Ethique de la, différence sexuale. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques. 1966. Écrits I and II. Paris: du Seuil.Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques. 1975. Encore, Le Séminaire de Jacques Lacan, Livre XX. Paris: du Seuil.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. 1986. The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Phihsophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Plato, , 1932. The Symposium, ed: Bury, R. G.Cambridge: W. Heffer and Sons.Google Scholar
Pomeroy, Sarah. 1973. Selected bibliography on women. Arethusa. 6:2. ‐‐‐‐‐‐. 1975. Andromache and the Question of Matriarchy. Revue des études Greques. LXXXVIII, 16–19.Google Scholar
Thomas, C.G. 1973. Matriarchy in Early Greece: The Bronze and Dark Ages. Arethusa. 6: 2.Google Scholar
Thomson, George. 1949. The Prehistoric Aegean. London: Laurence and WishartGoogle Scholar
Willets, R.F. 1977. The Civilization of Ancient Crete. London: Batsford.Google Scholar