We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
Achtenburg, Deborah. 1996. Aristotelian resources for feminist thinking. In Feminism and ancient philosophy, ed. Ward, Julie. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . 1979. Aristotle's categories and de interpretatione, trans. Ackrill, J.L.Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . 1984. The complete works of Aristotle, ed. Barnes, Jonathan. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hirshman, Linda R.1992. The book of “A.”Texas Law Review70(March): 971.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1989. Is the subject of science sexed? In Feminism and science, trans. Bove, Carol, ed. Tuana, Nancy. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1993. Place, interval: A reading of Aristotle, physics IV. In An ethics of sexual difference, trans. Burke, Carolyn and Gill, Gillian. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. 1992. Aristotle, feminism, and needs for functioning. Texas Law Review70(March): 1019.Google Scholar
Nye, Andrea. 1990. Words of power: A feminist reading of the history of logic. New York: Routledge, 1990.Google Scholar
Plumwood, Valerie. 1993. The politics of reason: towards a feminist logic. Australasian Journal of Philosophy71(4): 436–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar