Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T02:41:09.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mass Culture and School Sports

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2017

Joel H. Spring*
Affiliation:
The Department of Education, Case Western Reserve University

Extract

One could easily construct an argument that modern professional sports, played within the capitalistic atmosphere of competitive salaries and managerial techniques, provides the mass spectator with a sense of relief and adventure from the dull monotony and drudgery of our modern technological and urban environment. An extension of this argument would be that spectator sports by occupying the leisure time of the mass man dilutes his political consciousness and diffuses his feelings of rebellion. Within this framework sports could be considered one of the controlling instruments of our technological culture.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 1974 by New York University 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Mitchell, Elmer D. and Mason, Bernard S., The Theory of Play (New York, 1935), pp. 171194.Google Scholar

2. Rainwater, Clarence E., The Play Movement in the United States (Chicago, 1922), pp. 1314.Google Scholar

3. Savage, Howard J., Bentley, Harold W., McGovern, John T. and Smiley, Dean F., American College Athletics (New York, 1929).Google Scholar

4. Ibid., pp. 333.Google Scholar

5. Ibid., pp. 5276.Google Scholar

6. See Glaab, Charles N. and Theodore Brown, A., A History of Urban America (New York, 1967), pp. 5383.Google Scholar

7. Kaestle, See Carl, The Evolution of an Urban School System (Cambridge, 1973); and Schultz, Stanley K., The Culture Factory (New York, 1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8. Curtis, Henry S. The Play Movement and Its Significance (New York, 1917), pp. 1518.Google Scholar

9. Ibid., pp. 111.Google Scholar

10. American, Sadie, “The Movement for Small Playgrounds,” American Journal of Sociology (September, 1898): 167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

11. Curtis, , Play Movement, pp. 15, 17, 39, 130, 246, and 247.Google Scholar

12. Naismith, James, “How Basketball Started and Why it Grew,” in Aims and Methods in School Athletics, edited by Dana Caulkins, E. (New York, 1932), pp. 221236.Google Scholar

13. Gulick, Luther, “Play and Democracy,” Proceedings of the First Annual Playground Congress (New York, 1907): 1116; and A Philosophy of Play (New York, 1920).Google Scholar

14. Gulick, , A Philosophy of Play, pp. 254261.Google Scholar

15. Ibid., pp. 236 and 263.Google Scholar

16. Ibid., p. 265.Google Scholar

17. Stanley Hall, G., Adolescence: Its Psychology and Its Relations to Physiology, Anthropology, Sociology, Sex, Crime, Religion, and Education (New York, 1945).Google Scholar

18. See Adams Puffer, J., The Boy and His Gang (Boston, 1912).Google Scholar

19. Curtis, , Play Movement, pp. 251252.Google Scholar

20. Groos, Karl, The Play of Man (New York, 1901), p. 182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

21. Addams, Jane, The Spirit of Youth and the City Streets (New York, 1909).Google Scholar

22. Tentative Report of the Committee on A System of Teaching Morals in the Public Schools,” National Education Association Proceedings (1911): 360.Google Scholar

23. Addams, Jane, “Public Recreation and Social Morality,” Proceedings of the First Annual Playground Congress (New York, 1907): 2224.Google Scholar

24. James, William, “The Moral Equivalent of War.A copy of this essay can be found in American Issues , ed. by Curti, Merle, Thorp, Willard and Baker, Carlos (Chicago, 1960), pp. 916923.Google Scholar

25. Hall, , Adolescence, Vol. I, p. xv.Google Scholar

26. See Krug, Edward A., The Shaping of the American High School (New York, 1964) and Spring, Joel, Education and the Rise of the Corporate State (Boston, 1972), pp. 108–125.Google Scholar

27. Cardinal Principles of Secondary Education (Bureau of Education, 1918).Google Scholar

28. For a study of the relationship between concepts of sexuality and instinct and the development of the high school, see Spring, Joel, “The American High School and the Development of Social Character” to be published in Work, Technology and Education (Urbana: The University of Illinois Press, 1974).Google Scholar

29. Mitchell, and Mason, , Theory of Play, pp. 438439.Google Scholar

30. Grob, Gerald N., Workers and Utopia (Evanston, Illinois, 1961), pp. 1819.Google Scholar

31. Curoe, Philip R. V., Educational Attitudes and Policies of Organized Labor in the United States (New York, 1926), pp. 100101.Google Scholar

32. Ibid., pp. 66193.Google Scholar

33. Savage, , American College Athletics, pp. 266290.Google Scholar

34. Steiner, Jesse Fredrick, Americans at Play: Recent Trends in Recreation and Leisure Time Activities (New York, 1933), pp. 97100.Google Scholar

35. Ibid., pp. 8694.Google Scholar

36. Survey of Land-Grant Colleges and Universities, directed by Klien, Arthur J., Bulletin 1930, No. 9, Office of Education (Washington D.C., 1930), p. 230.Google Scholar

37. Ibid., pp. 229236.Google Scholar

38. Ibid., pp. 457466.Google Scholar

39. Savage, , American College Athletics, p. 61.Google Scholar

40. Survey of Land-Grant Colleges, p. 457.Google Scholar

41. O. J. is Big in Buffalo,” Plain Dealer (Cleveland, December 17, 1973), Section D, p. 1.Google Scholar

42. Savage, , American College Athletics, pp. 296300.Google Scholar

43. Steiner, , Americans at Play, pp. 100102.Google Scholar