Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T02:48:09.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

“We Find Ourselves Preoccupied with the World of the Present”: Humanist Resistance to Progressive Education in Ontario

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Theodore Michael Christou*
Affiliation:
Queen's University

Extract

The work here explores the voices of Ontario's humanist educators, who advocated for the preservation of a curriculum theory rooted in faculty psychology, mental discipline, and the classics in the face of progressivist revisions to the province's public school organization. A great deal of scholastic sweat has been poured over the subject of progressive education, its meanings, and its purposes. Much less has been said about the critics of progressivist reform, who are referred to here as humanists; this term follows from the work of Herbert Kliebard, who characterized humanists as one of four competing interests in an epic struggle over the curriculum in the United States. Theodore Christou dubbed humanists “foils” to the progressivist reformers who succeeded in overturning Ontario's Programmes of Study for the public schools. Kliebard defined this group as:

the guardians of an ancient tradition tied to the power of reason and the finest elements of the Western cultural heritage… to them fell the task of reinterpreting, and thereby preserving as best as they could, their revered traditions and values in the face of rapid social change and a burgeoning school system.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 History of Education Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See, for instance, Milewski, Patrice, “Positivism and Post-World War I Elementary School Reform in Ontario,” Paedagogica Historica 48, no. 5 (2012): 729–43 and “The Scientisation of Schooling in Ontario, 1910–1934,” Paedagogica Historica 46, no. 3 (2010): 341–55; Heyking, Amy von, Creating Citizens: History and Identity in Alberta's Schools, 1905–1980 (Calgary: University of Calgary Press, 2006); Weiler, Kathleen, “The Historiography of Gender and Progressive Education in the United States,” Paedagogica Historica 42, nos. 1, 2 (February 2006): 161–76; Hayes, William, The Progressive Education Movement: Is It Still a Factor in Today's Schools? (New York: Rowman & Littlefield Education, 2006); Axelrod, Paul, “Beyond the Progressive Education Debate: A Profile of Toronto Schooling in the 1950s,” Historical Studies in Education 17, no. 2 (2005): 227–41; Brehony, Kevin. J., “A New Education for a New Era: The Contribution of the Conferences of the New Education Fellowship to the Disciplinary Field of Education, 1921–1938,” Paedagogica Historica 40, nos. 5, 6 (October 2004): 733–55; and Reese, William, “American Education in the Twentieth Century: Progressive Legacies,” Paedagogica Historica 39, no. 4 (2003): 415–16; Herbert M. Kliebard, Forging the American Curriculum: Essays in Curriculum History and Theory (London: Routledge, 1992); Stamp, Robert M., The Schools of Ontario, 1876–1976 (Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press, 1982).Google Scholar

2 Kliebard, Herbert, The Struggle for the American Curriculum, 1893–1958 (New York: RoutledgeFalmer, 2004).Google Scholar

3 Christou, Theodore Michael, Progressive Education: Revisioning and Refraining Ontario's Public Schools, 1919–1942 (Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press, 2012).Google Scholar

4 Kliebard, , The Struggle for the American Curriculum, 29.Google Scholar

5 Kloppenberg, James T., Uncertain Victory: Social Democracy and Progressivism in European and American nought, 1870–1920 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986), 299. Kloppenberg represents progressivism writ large as a “body of ideas cut loose from its moorings in the liberal tradition” (p. 298).Google Scholar

6 Christou, , Progressive Education. Google Scholar

9 Patterson, Robert, “Society and Education during the Wars and Their Interlude: 1914–1945,” in Canadian Education: A History, ed. Wilson, J. Donald, Stamp, Robert M., and Audet, Louis-Philippe (Toronto, ON: Prentice-Hall of Canada, 1986), 360–84.Google Scholar

10 McKillop, A. B., Matters of Mind: The University of Ontario, 1791–1951 (Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press, 1994), 321.Google Scholar

11 Christou, Theodore Michael, “The Complexity of Intellectual Currents: Duncan McArthur and Ontario's Progressivist Curriculum Reforms,” Paedagogica Historica 49, no. 5 (2013): 677–97. The Revised Programmes of Study were reconfigured slightly and reissued in 1942 and 1943, respectively.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

12 Mark, C. E., “Some Educational Pitfalls,” The School (March, 1940), 564.Google Scholar

13 Ibid.Google Scholar

14 Ibid.Google Scholar

15 Ibid.Google Scholar

16 Bondy, L. J., “The Present Situation in Modern Languages in Our Schools,” The School (October 1938), 120.Google Scholar

17 Ibid.Google Scholar

18 Ibid., 123.Google Scholar

19 Kliebard, Herbert, “The Decline of Humanistic Studies in the American School Curriculum,” in Forging the American Curriculum: Essays in Curriculum History and Theory (New York and London: Routledge, 1992), 3.Google Scholar

20 Dewey, John, “Whither Humanism,” The Thinker 2 (1930), 9.Google Scholar

21 Kliebard, , “The Decline of Humanistic Studies in the American School Curriculum,” 3.Google Scholar

22 Committee of the Classical Section of the OEA, “The Report on Latin,” The School (June 1935), 865–71.Google Scholar

23 As the Press Viewed the O.E.A. Convention,” The Canadian School Journal (April 1940), 155.Google Scholar

24 Christou, , “The Complexity of Intellectual Currents,” 677–97.Google Scholar

25 McArthur Would Cut Language Requirement,” The Globe and Mail, 30 March 1940, 5.Google Scholar

26 McKillop, , Matters of Mind, 463.Google Scholar

27 Ibid., 7–8.Google Scholar

28 Ibid., 7.Google Scholar

29 McCulley, Joseph, “Education in a Changing Society,” The Canadian School Journal (January 1932), 58.Google Scholar

30 Selles, Johanna, Methodists and Women's Education in Ontario, 1836–1925 (Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

31 See, for instance, “Our Mission,” The Canadian Quarterly Review 1 (1856), 15; “Normal Schools,” Journal of Education for Lower Canada 1, no. 1 (1857), 2–6; Cowper, William, “Popularisation of Adult Education in the Present Age,” Journal of Education for Upper Canada 13, no. 12 (1860), 181, Sturtevant, E. H., “Utility of the Studies of Classics,” Journal of Education for Upper Canada 9, no. 10 (1856): 147–48; McCallum, M. B., “Embryo Citizenship,” The Western School Journal 14, no. 6 (1919), 234–39; “Compensation for Injuries to Canadian Workmen: Chapter Six: Some Constructive Conclusions,” The Canadian Law Journal 54, no. 8–9 (1918), 325–34.Google Scholar

32 Neurasthenia, its causes and treatment,” The Canada Lancet 44, no. 6 (1911), 418–25.Google Scholar

33 Stamp, Robert M., The Schools of Ontario, 9.Google Scholar

34 Original Papers in Relation to a Course of Liberal Education,” American Journal of Science and Arts 15, no. 2 (1829), 301302.Google Scholar

35 Ibid.Google Scholar

36 Crocker, L. J., “What Are Our Objectives,” The School (December 1940), 331.Google Scholar

37 Ibid., 655.Google Scholar

38 Liddy, R. B., “The School as a Factor in the Making of the Mind,” The Canadian School Journal (June 1934), 233.Google Scholar

39 Fyfe, W. H., “Science in Secondary Education,” The School (April 1934), 653.Google Scholar

40 Fyfe, W. H., Inaugural Address (October 24, 1930), W. H. Fyfe Papers, box 2 file 9, Queen's University Archives.Google Scholar

41 Smith, J. H., “Mere Knowledge Does Not Constitute an Education,” The Canadian School Journal (January 1932), 38.Google Scholar

42 Ibid.Google Scholar

43 Ellis, Jason, “‘Backward and Brilliant Children': A Social and Policy History of Disabilty, Childhood, and Education in Toronto's Special Education Classes, 1910–1945“ (PhD dissertation, York University, 2011).Google Scholar

44 Ibid.Google Scholar

45 Husband, A. J., “The Teaching of History in the Secondary School,” The School (December 1931), 308.Google Scholar

46 Here and There: Mental Discipline,” The School (February 1935), 469. Ramsey's text was considered a definitive text on English language and grammar for students in Ontario's schools. See Samuel Ramsey, The English Language and Grammar: An Historical Study of the Sources, Development, and Analogies of the Language and the Principles Governing Its Usage (New York and London: Putnam and Sons, 1892).Google Scholar

47 Stamp, , The Schools of Ontario, 118.Google Scholar

48 Tomkins, George S., A Common Countenance: Stability and Change in the Canadian Curriculum (Vancouver: Pacific Educational Press, 2008).Google Scholar

49 Fyfe, W. H., “The Objects of Education: Appreciation and Expression,” The Canadian School Journal (April 1932), 132.Google Scholar

50 Kliebard, , “The Decline of Humanistic Studies in the American School Curriculum,” 17.Google Scholar

51 Harris, William T., “What Should the Public Schools Teach?” Forum 4 (1888), 574.Google Scholar

52 Kirkconnell, Watson and Woodhouse, A. S. P., ed., The Humanities in Canada (Ottawa, ON: The Humanities Research Council of Canada, 1947), 203.Google Scholar

53 McKillop, , Matters of Mind, 465.Google Scholar

54 Honour Classics in the University of Toronto (Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press, 1929), 29, italics in original text.Google Scholar

55 The Report on Latin,” The School (June 1935), 866.Google Scholar

56 MacPhee, E. D., “The Value of the Classics,” The School (October 1927), 111. MacPhee would later serve as the first dean of commerce at the University of British Columbia, between 1950 and 1960.Google Scholar

57 Gill, Doris M., “History Teaching through Great Lives: Alexander the Great,” The School (October 1929), 231.Google Scholar

58 Wallace, Archer, “A Boy and His Reading,” The Canadian School Journal (February 1932), 56.Google Scholar

59 See, for example, Smith, Lillian H., “Fifty Essential Books for Boys and Girls,” The Canadian School Journal (March 1934), 91.Google Scholar

60 Campbell, M. A., “The Public School Library,” The Canadian School Journal (January 1932), 45.Google Scholar

61 Fyfe, W. H., “Science in Secondary Education,” 655.Google Scholar

62 Ibid.Google Scholar

63 Silcox, S., “The Teacher's Book Shelf,” The School (March 1930), 470.Google Scholar

64 Lowther, Arthur A., “A Vocational School Literature Course,” The School (September 1926), 53.Google Scholar

65 Brown, J. W., “The School Library,” The Canadian School Journal (January 1934), 8.Google Scholar

66 Spencer, Herbert, Education: Intellectual, Moral and Physical (Patterson, NJ: Littlefield, Adams, 1963).Google Scholar

67 Bovey, Wilfred, “The Educational Value of Handicrafts,” The School (November 1935), 187.Google Scholar

68 Books for Information, Inspiration, and Pleasure,” The Canadian School Journal (February 1933), 44.Google Scholar

69 Christou, Theodore, Progressive Education, 110–12.Google Scholar

70 Rogers, George F., “President's Address: Canadian Education Association,” The School (January 1937), 385.Google Scholar

71 Ibid., 384.Google Scholar

72 Murphy, Madonna M., The History and Philosophy of Education: Voices of Educational Pioneers (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson, 2006), 14.Google Scholar

73 Ibid.Google Scholar

74 Woodruff, Paul, First Democracy: The Challenge of an Ancient Idea (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

75 Kliebard, Herbert, “The Decline of Humanistic Studies in the American School Curriculum,” 6.Google Scholar

76 Stamp, Robert, Ontario Secondary School Program Innovations and Student Retention Rates: 1920s–1970s (Toronto, ON: Ministry of Education, 1988), 8.Google Scholar

77 Ibid., 4.Google Scholar

78 Postgraduate schooling was predominately in the hands of universities and normal schools.Google Scholar

79 Ewing, Charles M., “The Case for Latin in the High Schools,” 101.Google Scholar

80 Gidney, R. D. and Millar, W. P. J., How Schools Worked: Public Education in English Canada, 1900–1940 (Montreal, QC: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2012), 217.Google Scholar

81 McKillop, , Matters of Mind, 325.Google Scholar

82 See Gidney, and Millar, , How Schools Worked, 217–70.Google Scholar

83 Ibid. See also Christou, Theodore, “'Schools Are No Longer Merely Educational Institutions': The Rhetoric of Social Efficiency in Ontario Education, 1931–1935,” History of Education 42, no. 5 (2013), 566–77.Google Scholar

84 Gidney, and Millar, , How Schools Worked, 217–70.Google Scholar

85 Ibid.Google Scholar

86 Aitken, W. E. M., “The Use of a High School Library,” The School (March 1931), 614.Google Scholar

87 Editorial notes: Adult Education,” The School (March 1934), 559.Google Scholar

88 Ibid.Google Scholar

89 Spencer, , Progress: Its Law and Cause in Education. As per previous comment regarding this citation. As noted previously, Spencer's work was wildly popular, yet critiques of Spencer's gender and class privileges were not within the context of the sources examined.Google Scholar

90 Campbell, J. D., “The Elementary School Library of Ontario,” The Canadian School Journal (April 1934), 131.Google Scholar

91 Ewing, Charles M., “The Case for Latin in the High Schools,” 100.Google Scholar

92 Ibid.Google Scholar

93 Ibid., 101.Google Scholar

94 Paton, J. M., “Better English,” The School (May 1936), 733.Google Scholar

95 See, for example, Duthie, E., “Canada, An Illiterate Nation: English in Ashelon,” Queen's Quarterly 43 (Spring 1936), 4350.Google Scholar

96 MacPhee, E. D., “The Values of the Classics,” 113.Google Scholar

97 Ibid.Google Scholar

98 Ibid., 119. See, for example, Henmon, V. A. C., “The Measurement of Ability in Latin: Part I, Vocabulary,” Journal of Educational Psychology 8 (November 1917), 515–38; “The Measurement of Ability in Latin: Part II, Sentence Tests,” Journal of Educational Psychology 8 (November 1917), 589–99; and “The Measurement of Ability in Latin: Part III, Vocabulary and Sentence Tests,” Journal of Educational Psychology 11 (March 1920), 121–36. Henmon was a psychologist and professor at the University of Wisconsin, who served as the director or the School of Education after World War I.Google Scholar

99 Here and There,” The School (November 1934), 189–90.Google Scholar

100 Ibid.Google Scholar

101 Taylor, B. C., “The Latin Society—I,” The School (September 1941), 41.Google Scholar

102 Ibid.Google Scholar

103 King, R. H., “Civics in Ancient History,” The School (February 1933), 515–21.Google Scholar

104 Fyfe, W. H., “Science in Secondary Education,” 656.Google Scholar

105 “Can the Present Courses of Study Be Adapted to Meet the Needs of Students Who Do Not Wish to Matriculate?” The Canadian School Journal (August 1932), 270.Google Scholar

106 Ibid., 40.Google Scholar

107 Ibid., 112.Google Scholar

108 Kliebard, Herbert, “The Decline of Humanistic Studies in the American School Curriculum,” 15. See also James, William, Principles of Psychology, vol. I (New York: Henry Holt & Co., 1890), 666–67.Google Scholar

109 Sandiford, Peter, “Transfer of Training,” The School (October 1938), 94.Google Scholar

110 Thorndike, Edward Lee and Woodworth, R. S., “The Influence of Improvement in One Mental Function upon the Efficiency of Other Functions,” Psychological Review 8 (May 1901), 247–61.Google Scholar

111 Sandiford, Peter, “Transfer of Training,” 94–95.Google Scholar

112 Ibid., 94.Google Scholar

113 Transom, E. J., “Time Off for Thinking,” The School (March 1941), 607.Google Scholar

114 Editorial Notes: Education for Citizenship,” The School (June 1936), 823.Google Scholar

115 Christou, , “The Complexity of Intellectual Currents.” A Revised Programme for secondary schools would be issued in 1938, and both documents would be revised and reissued in 1942 and 1943, respectively.Google Scholar

116 McKillop, A. B., Matters of Mind, 454.Google Scholar

117 Scott, Ernest F., “The Effects of the War on Literature and Learning,” Queen's Quarterly 27 (December 1919), 147–53.Google Scholar

118 McKillop, A. B., Matters of Mind, 457.Google Scholar

119 Currie, Arthur W., “Address,” 6.Google Scholar

120 Ibid.Google Scholar

121 Axelrod, Paul, Making a Middle Class: Student Life in English Canada during the Thirties (Montreal, QC: McGill-Queen's University Press, 1990), 3941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

122 Kirkconnell, Watson and A.Woodhouse, S. P., The Humanities in Canada, 46.Google Scholar

123 McKillop, A. B., Matters of Mind, 463.Google Scholar

124 Committee of the Classical Section of the Ontario Educational Association, “The Report on Latin,” The School (June 1935), 865–71.Google Scholar

125 Ibid.Google Scholar

126 McKillop, A. B., Matters of Mind, 463.Google Scholar

127 Ibid.Google Scholar

128 Kliebard, Herbert, “The Decline of Humanistic Studies in the American School Curriculum,” 3.Google Scholar

129 Neatby, Hilda, So Little for the Mind (Toronto, ON: Clarke, Irwin, 1953).Google Scholar

130 Sutherland, , “The Triumph of Formalism,” 176.Google Scholar

131 Ibid.Google Scholar

132 Axelrod, Paul, “Beyond the Progressive Education Debate,” 228.Google Scholar

133 With respect to this question, Axelrod argues that the historical truth lay in an amalgam, which mixed both extremes: “Rather than a case of either progressive or traditional education, school policy was an amalgam in which educators were using available and emerging tools to address the perceived instructional needs of a ballooning population,” 228.Google Scholar