Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:18:40.368Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Documentary Impulse: Archives in the Bush

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 May 2014

David Zeitlyn
David Zeitlyn*
Affiliation:
University of Kent
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A wide variety of documents exist in Cameroonian rural villages, few of which are likely to be preserved since many are not perceived as being worthy of long-term conservation as well as being vulnerable to damp, termites, and to recycling in the form of cigarette or wrapping paper. In this paper I consider the information contained in the different types of written record and how they interrelate. In a companion piece (Zeitlyn mss) I continue to discuss a diary written at my instigation over an eighteen-month period.

Anthropologists and historians alike are prone to a writing disease: “If in doubt write it down.” We record things often for the sake of recording (sometimes without having a specific end in mind for any particular record). Valuable serendipity often results, and our colleagues and successors, as well as the descendants of those we have worked with are sometimes the beneficiaries. Academics, and anthropologists among them, often seek out like-minded people to spend time with. This in itself raises some questions about the generalizability of information so received. But leaving that aside, the accounts of anthropologists and their key informants (for example Muchona [Turner 1967], Ogotommêli [Griaule 1965]) are striking, as much for the resemblances between academic and informant as for their putative differences.

Type
Research Article
Information
History in Africa , Volume 32 , 2005 , pp. 415 - 434
Copyright
Copyright © African Studies Association 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bloch, M. ed. 1975. Political Language and Oratory in Traditional Society. London.Google Scholar
Bloch, M. ed. 1998. How We Think They Think. Anthropological Approaches to Cognition, Memory, and Literacy. Boulder.Google Scholar
Curtin, P.D. ed. 1997 (1967). Africa Remembered. Narratives by West Africans from the Era of the Slave Trade. Prospect Heights, Illinois.Google Scholar
Du Boulay, R.W.H. 1951. “Notes on the German Resthouse and Taxbook (Kabri).” Rhodes House: Nightingale Papers MSS Afr s 1518 (3), 85, 85v.Google Scholar
Gebauer, P. 1964. Spider Divination in the Cameroons. Milwaukee.Google Scholar
Goody, J.R., Cole, M. and Scribner, S.. 1987. “Writing and Formal Operations: a Case Study among the Vai.” In Interface Between the Written and the Oral. Cambridge, 191–208.Google Scholar
Griaule, M. 1965. Conversations with Ogotemmêli: an Introduction to Dogon Religious Ideas. London.Google Scholar
Regis, Helen A. 2003. Fulbe Voice: Marriage, Islam and Medicine in Northern Cameroon. Boulder.Google Scholar
Schneider, G.D. 1992. Norikam. Images and Field Notes. Portland.Google Scholar
Street, B.V. 1984. Literacy in Theory and Practice. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Theall, D.F. 1992. “Beyond the Orality/Literacy Dichotomy. Postmodern Culture 2:1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, V.W. 1967. The Forest of Symbols: Aspects of Ndembu Ritual. Ithaca.Google Scholar
Zeitlyn, D. 1992. “Un fragment de l'histoire des Mambilas: un texte du Duabang.” Journal des Africanistes 62:135–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeitlyn, D.. 1994. Sua in Somié. Mambila Traditional Religion. Sankt Augustin.Google Scholar
Zeitlyn, D. 2001 Reading in the Modem World: Anthropological Perspectives on Writing and the Virtual World <http://csac.anthropology.ac.uk/CSACMonog/RRRweb/>Google Scholar
Zeitlyn, D. 2003. “The Talk Goes Outside: Argument, Privacy, and Power in Mambila Society: Towards a Sociology of Embedded Praxis.” Africa 73:606–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeitlyn, D. mss. “Situated Particularity or Pepys in the Bush: an Experiment in Diary Writing from Rural Cameroon.” Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
Zeitlyn, D., Mial, N., and Mbe, C.. 2000. Trois études sur les mambila de Somié, Cameroun. Boston.Google Scholar