Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T04:53:31.889Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Foreign Office and British Propaganda during the First World War

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

Philip M. Taylor
Philip M. Taylor
Affiliation:
University of Leeds
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In July 1918 it was the considered opinion of Lord Northcliffe that propaganda and diplomacy were incompatible. When, only five months earlier, Northcliffe had accepted Lloyd George's invitation to take charge of the newly created department of enemy propaganda, his appointment, coupled with that of Lord Beaverbrook as Britain's first minister of information, had held out the promise of a new phase in the efficiency and co-ordination of Britain's conduct of official propaganda in foreign countries. It was then, in February 1918, that the Foreign Office had finally been forced to relinquish its control over such work. However, the creation of the two new departments had produced an intolerable situation. After three years of inter-departmental rivalry and squabbling over the conduct of propaganda overseas, Whitehall closed ranks on Beaverbrook and Northcliffe and united behind the Foreign Office in opposition to any further transference of related duties into their hands. Now, after five months of continued obstruction, Northcliffe expressed the view that:

As a people we do not understand propaganda ways…Propaganda is advertising and diplomacy is no more likely to understand advertising than advertising is likely to understand diplomacy.

Type
Articles
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 23 , Issue 4 , December 1980 , pp. 875 - 898
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Northcliffe to C. J. Phillips, 12 July 1918. Cited in Harmsworth, G. and Pound, R., Northcliffe (London, 1959), p. 653Google Scholar.

2 Beaverbrook, Lord, Men and power, 1917–18 (London, 1956), p. 290Google Scholar.

3 Taylor, A. J. P., Beaverbrook (London, 1972), cited p. 145Google Scholar.

4 H. H. Asquith to the king, 31 Aug. 1914. P[ublic] R[ecord] O[ffice], CAB 41/35/38.

5 H. O. Lee, ‘British propaganda during the great war, 1914–18’, PRO, INF 4/4A. The exact dates remain vague and even this document, the ‘official’ history written shortly after the war but before the papers relating to First World War propaganda were destroyed in 1920, fails to throw light on the early chronological developments. For a detailed study of the news department see Taylor, Philip M., ‘“The projection of Britain”; British overseas publicity and propaganda, 1914–39, with particular reference to the news department of the foreign office’, Leeds University Ph.D. thesis, 1978Google Scholar.

6 For an excellent review of the numerous unofficial propaganda bodies see Squires, j. D., British propaganda at home and in the United States from 1914 to 1917 (Cambridge, Mass., 1935), pp. 16–25Google Scholar.

7 The work of the Press Bureau has been described by SirCook, Edward in his The press in wartime (London, 1920)Google Scholar but awaits a modern study.

8 G. H. Mair, ‘Report on [the] propaganda of [the] Neutral Press Organisation’, undated. PRO, FO 371/2555, 12467: memorandum by Simon, J. A., ‘The Neutral Press Committee’, 8 10 1915Google Scholar. CAB 37/135/14.

9 ‘The activities of Wellington House during the great war’, undated, unsigned. INF 4/1B.

10 Lee, ‘British propaganda during the great war, 1914–18’, INF 4/4A.

11 For a more detailed examination of the work of Wellington House see Sanders, M. L., ‘Wellington House and British propaganda during the First World War’, Historical Journal, XVIII, I (1975), 119–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 Unsigned memorandum on the news department, 29 Jan. 1915. FO 371/2555, 12467.

13 One official observed in 1914:‘The contumely with which the German propaganda has been visited shows very clearly that Americans would dislike any kind of machinery for the manipulation of their public opinion.’ A. Willert to G. Robinson, 20 Nov. 1914. Willert MSS, T[he] T[imes] A[rchive].

14 Foreign Office memorandum, ‘British propaganda in allied and neutral countries’, 20 Dec. 1916. CAB 24/3, G. 102.

15 Ibid.

16 Tilley, J. and Gaselee, S., The Foreign Office (London, 1933), pp. 279–83Google Scholar.

17 Robinson to Willert, 31 Dec. 1914. Willert MSS, T.T.A.

18 Unsigned memorandum, 27 Oct. 1914. FO 371/2555, 12467.

19 It was later noted that ‘in the early days of propaganda, even Westminster was found to be too far from Fleet Street’ General notes on propaganda, undated, unsigned. INF 4/1B.

20 Cecil, then responsible for the news department's work in his capacity as parliamentary under-secretary of state for foreign affairs, had insisted that ‘the Foreign Office could allow very considerable latitude to journalists, and would even go so far as to abandon any preliminary submission of matter connected with foreign policy at all’. Memorandum by J. A. Simon, 27 Oct. 1915. CAB 37/136/34.

21 For further details see Admiral, RearSirBrownrigg, Douglas, Indiscretions of the naval censor (London, 1920)Google Scholar, ch. 111.

22 Donald, Robert: Editor, Daily Chronicle, 1904–1918Google Scholar; appointed by Lloyd George to investigate British propaganda organization in 1917.

23 Donald to Lloyd George, 9 Jan. 1917. INF 4/4B.

24 A history of the work of M.I. 7, 1914–19. INF 4/1B.

25 Sir R. Brade to Foreign Office, 10 Dec. 1915. FO 371/2579, 188244.

26 Minute by Montgomery, 10 Dec. 1915. FO 371/2579, 188244.

27 Schuster to Montgomery, 13 Dec. 1915. FO 371/2579, 190927.

28 Schuster to Sir E. Troup, 13 Dec. 1915. FO 371/2579, 190927.

29 Knightley, P., The first casualty; the war correspondent as hero, propagandist and myth maker from the Crimea to Vietnam (London, 1975), pp. 80–112Google Scholar; Charteris, Brig.-Gen. J., At G.H.Q (London, 1931), pp. 79, 94, 114–16Google Scholar; Hazlehurst, C., Politicians at war (London, 1971), pp. 147–51Google Scholar.

30 Brownrigg, described Montgomery and Mair as resembling ‘eager bridegrooms, ever pressing and coaxing me, the elusive bride, to grant them more and yet more favours in the shape of permits to visit the fleet’. Indiscretions of the naval censor, p. 79Google Scholar.

31 Schuster to Troup, 13 Dec. 1915. FO 371/2579, 190927.

32 This was, in fact, accurate. See Montgomery's proposals of 2 Oct. and 6 Dec. 1915. FO 371/2579. 190927.

33 Maurice de Bunsen to War Office, 14 Dec. 1915. FO 371/2579, 190927.

34 Ibid.

35 A history of the work of M.I. 7, 1914–19. INF 4/1B.

36 Report and proceedings of a standing sub-committee's enquiry regarding press and postal censorship in time of war, press censorship, 31 Jan. 1913. CAB 38/23/6. See also Towle, P., ‘The debate on wartime censorship in Britain, 1902–1914’ in Bond, B. and Roy, I. (eds.), War and society: a yearbook of military history (London, 1975)Google Scholar.

37 Memorandum by Montgomery, 6 Dec. 1915, enclosed in Montgomery to S. W. Harris, 16 Dec. 1915. FO 371/2579, 200406.

38 Simon to Cecil, 20 Dec. 1915. FO 371/2579, 200406.

39 Ibid.

40 Cecil to Simon, 22 Dec. 1915. FO 371/2579, 200406.

41 Ibid.

42 Ibid. This statement reveals an important point. In the first half of the war, any reference to the ‘Foreign Office attitude’ concerning propaganda really means a small group of officials centred on Montgomery and Cecil. Grey and Nicolson rarely played an active role in the work. Their successors, however, Balfour and Hardinge, were more prepared to involve themselves, although perhaps more by force of circumstance than through personal choice.

43 Samuel had succeeded Simon following the latter's resignation overthe issue of conscription on New Year's Day 1916. It appears that he was more amenable than Simon on the transference of Mair to the Foreign Office. Cecil to Samuel, 21 Jan. 1916. FO 371/2835, 17981.

44 Lord Onslow had been permanent private secretary to Sir Edward Grey andSir Arthur Nicolson, 1911–13, but was at this time a member of M.I.7.

45 Record of proceedings of a conference at the Home Office, 26 Jan. 1916.INF 4/9.

46 Masterman to Cecil, 31 Jan. 1916. FO 371/2835, 20631.

47 Record of proceedings, 26 Jan. 1916, INF 4/9.

48 Memorandum by Cecil, 28 Jan. 1916. FO 371/2835, 17981.

49 E. T. Cook to Montgomery, 31 Jan. 1916; Montgomery to Cook, 1 Feb. 1916. FO 371/2835, 20630.

50 Masterman to Cecil, 31 Jan. 1916. FO 371/2835, 20631.

51 Montgomery to Masterman, 31 Jan. 1916. FO 371/2835, 20631.

52 Minutes by Cecil, 6 and 7 Feb. 1916. FO 371/2835, 21459.

53 Newton, Lord, Retrospection (London, 1941), p. 218Google Scholar.

54 Squires, J. D., British propaganda, p. 33Google Scholar.

55 It is from this point that the administrative records of the news department begin, and for the remaining two and a half years of the war there exist about 250 volumes in the FO 395 series at the PRO.

56 War Office memorandum on press propaganda, 1 Feb. 1916. INF 4/9.

57 Ibid.

58 Charteris, At G.H.Q., diary entry for 22 July 1916. See also exchange of letters between Montgomery and Cockerill of 11 and 12 July 1916. FO 371/2835, 136247.

59 Charteris, diary entry for 2 Aug. 1916. Miles Lampson, commenting upon the ‘incredible and discreditable’ lack of public interest in war films, informed Charteris that ‘all the people want to see is Charlie Chaplin’. Ibid. p. 166.

60 Ibid. diary for 19 Sept. 1916.

61 Lamson to Montgomery, 28 July 1916. FO 371/2835, 184995.

62 Minute by Montgomery, undated. FO 371/2835, 184995. See also the undated War Office memorandum enclosed in Macdonagh to Newton, 14 Sept. 1916, and Newton's reply (not sent) of 18 Sept. FO 371/2835, 193134.

63 CAB 23/1, 1(4). 9 Dec. 1916.

64 ‘British propaganda in allied and neutral countries; Admiralty notes on the use of the press in the United States of America’, 20 Dec. 1916. CAB 24/3, G. 101.

65 ‘Note by the General Staff on the organisation of propaganda’, 23 Dec. 1916. CAB 24/3, G. 103.

66 Foreign Office memorandum, ‘British propaganda in allied and neutral countries’, 20 Dec. 1916. CAB 24/3, G. 102.

67 Ibid.

68 Note by Cecil, 29 Dec. 1916. CAB 24/3, G. 102.

69 CAB 23/1, 43(7).

70 CAB 23/1 29(9). 2 Jan. 1917.

71 Lloyd George to Donald, 1 Jan. 1917. INF 4/4B.

72 Newton was also head of the prisoners of war department of the Foreign Office.

73 Donald to Lloyd George, 9 Jan. 1917. INF 4/4B.

74 Donald to C. P. Scott, 29 May 1917. INF 4/7.

75 CAB 23/1, 43(7). 24 Jan. 1917.

76 Note by Montgomery, 3 Feb. 1917. PRO, FO 800/384, Pp/17/2.

77 Drummond to Balfour, 3 Feb. 1917. FO 800/384, Pp/17/3; Drummond to Cecil (now minister for blockade), 4 Feb. 1917. FO 800/384, Pp/17/4.

78 Note by Balfour, undated. CAB 24/6, G.T. 2.

79 Note by Buchan, J., ‘Propaganda – a department of information’, 3 02 1917Google Scholar. CAB 24/3, G. 128.

80 CAB 23/1, 75(13).

81 Donald to C. P. Scott, 29 May 1917, INF 4/7.

82 Lloyd George to Donald, 6 June 1917; Buchan to Donald, 6 June 1917. INF 4/4B.

83 Northcliffe, for example, wrote: ‘We were in high hopes when Mr Buchan was created “Director of Information”, a sufficiently comprehensive title. But Mr Buchan turns out to be virtually a subordinate of the Foreign Office where he works. His work, we are sure, is of the greatest national importance. The point is that it is merely that of an addition to the existing “publicity” departments, not that of a supreme co-ordinating centre.’ The Times, 7 Aug. 1917.

84 CAB 24/3, 230(15). 10 Sept. 1917.

85 Beaverbrook, , Men and power, p. 266Google Scholar.

86 Lloyd George to Donald, 19 Oct. 1917. INF 4/4B; Taylor, H. A., Robert Donald (London, undated), pp. 156–7Google Scholar.

87 Donald to Carson, 25 Oct. 1917. INF 4/4B.

88 Donald, Robert, ‘Inquiry into the extent and efficiency of propaganda: reports on various branches of propaganda work, and recommendations’. 4 12 1917Google Scholar. INF 4/4B; CAB 27/18, PAC 3.

89 Burnham, Riddell, Beaverbrook and Donald to Sir Edward Carson, 14 Dec. 1917. INF 4/4B.

90 Buchan to Carson, 28 Dec. 1917. INF 4/5.

91 Memorandum sent to M. P. A. Hankey and covering note by SirCarson, E., ‘A psychological offensive against Germany’, 11 12 1917Google Scholar. CAB 24/35, G.T. 2941.

92 See the unsigned memorandum prepared by M.I. 9a entitled ‘German propaganda in 1917: some notes on its methods, material and manipulation’. INF 1/715.

93 SirClark, F., The central office of information (London, 1970), p. 23Google Scholar.

94 H. H. Asquith to the king, 31 Aug. 1914. CAB 41/35/38.

95 Taylor, A. J. P., Beaverbrook, p. 137Google Scholar.

96 Warman, R., ‘The erosion of Foreign Office influence in the making offoreign policy, 1916–18’, Historical Journal, XV, 1 (1972), 113–59Google Scholar.

97 Note by the intelligence department of the department of information, 4 Jan. 1918. CAB 24/38, G.T. 3226.

98 Report of the work of the department of propaganda in enemy countries, undated, unsigned. CAB 24/75, G.T. 6839.

99 Henry Wickham Steed: Foreign editor, The Times; appointed editor-in-chief, 1919–22.Google Scholar

100 Northcliffe to Balfour, 24 Feb. 1918. FO 889/4, No. 764.

101 For further details see SirStuart's, CampbellSecrets of Crewe House: the story of a famous campaign (London, 1920)Google Scholar, ch. III.

102 Balfour to Lloyd George, 31 July 1918. FO 800/207.

103 Calder, K. J., Britain and the origins of the new Europe, 1914–18 (Cambridge, 1976), p. 177CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

104 Beaverbrook to Lloyd George, 24 June 1918, enclosed in Northcliffe to Balfour, 7 July 1918. FO 800/212.

105 See, for example, Cecil's views on the subject cited in Taylor, , Beaverbrook, pp. 148–9Google Scholar.

106 Memorandum by Balfour, 5 Feb. 1918. CAB 24/41, G.T. 3547.

107 Memorandum by Lord Beaverbrook, ‘The need for an intelligence department of the ministry of information’, 20 Feb. 1918. CAB 24/43, G.T. 3788.

108 Memorandum by Balfour, 28 Feb. 1918. CAB 24/43, G.T. 3788.

109 Foreign Office memorandum, undated, unsigned (but probably by Hardinge), enclosed in a memorandum by Balfour, 28 Feb. 1918. CAB 24/43, G.T. 3788.

110 CAB 23/5, 349(11), 29 Feb. 1918.

111 Minutes of a conference held in General Smuts' room, 5 Mar. 1918. CAB 24/44, G.T. 3823.

112 Minutes of a conference held in General Smuts' room, 13 Mar. 1918. CAB 24/45, G.T. 3942.

113 FO 366/787, 44472.

114 Enclosure in Balfour to First Lord of the Admiralty, 11 Apr. 1918. FO 800/207.

115 Beaverbrook to Balfour, 21 May 1918. FO 800/207.

116 Memorandum by E. Percy and A. E. Zimmern, 17 July 1918. FO 371/3474, 108951.

117 Report of the policy committee of the inter-allied conference on propaganda in enemy countries, enclosed in H. K. Hudson to M. P. A. Hankey, 21 Aug. 1918. CAB 24/61, G.T. 5492.

118 Schuster to Robinson, 3 Dec. 1914. INF 4/1B.

119 Enclosure in Schuster to Montgomery, 18 Dec. 1914. FO 371/2207, 88913.

120 H. O. Lee, ‘British propaganda during the great war, 1914–1918’. INF 4/4A.

121 Bruntz, G. C., Allied propaganda and the collapse of the German empire in 1918 (New York, 1938), cited p. 8Google Scholar.

122 Taylor, , Beaverbrook, p. 145Google Scholar.

123 Memorandum by Beaverbrook, ‘The organisation and functions of the ministry of information’, Sept. 1918. INF 4/5:

124 Beaverbrook to Lloyd George, 24 June 1918. FO 800/212; also cited in Owen, F., Tempestuous journey (London, 1954), pp. 433–4Google Scholar.