Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T22:49:08.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Womanpower Problem in Britain during the Second World War

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

Harold L. Smith
Harold L. Smith
Affiliation:
University of Houston at Victoria
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

At the national women's conference convened by the government in September 1943 Winston Churchill assured the women delegates that the contribution to the war effort by British women had ‘definitely altered those social and sex balances which years of convention had established’. His belief that the war had brought about profound changes in the status of women was shared by contemporary authors attempting to evaluate the effect of the war on British women. Studies written near the end of the war by Margaret Goldsmith and Gertrude Williams refer to a wartime ‘revolution’ in the position of women. Both authors defined this revolution primarily in terms of the changed position of women workers.

Type
Articles
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 27 , Issue 4 , December 1984 , pp. 925 - 945
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Report of the proceedings of the National Conference of Women called by H.M. Government (London, 1943), p. 6Google Scholar. Institution of Electrical Engineers, Caroline Haslett papers, NAEST 33/8.6.

2 Williams, Gertrude, Women and work (London, 1945), p. 1Google Scholar, and Goldsmith, Margaret, Women and the future (London, 1946), p. 9Google Scholar.

3 Marwick, Arthur, War and social change in the twentieth century (London, 1974), p. 16Google Scholar.

4 Ibid. p. 16.

5 Lewenhak, Sheila, Women and trade unions: an outline history of women in the British trade union movement (New York, 1977)Google Scholar; Boston, Sarah, Women workers and the trade union movement (London, 1980)Google Scholar and Wilson, Elizabeth, Only halfway to paradise: women in postwar Britain, 1945–1968 (London, 1980)Google Scholar.

6 Smith, Harold, ‘The problem of “equal pay for equal work” in Great Britain during World War II’, The Journal of Modern History, LIII (12 1981), 652–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Women paid in 9d. weekly compared to 10d. for men, but received a weekly benefit of 15s. versus 17s. for men.

8 The differentiation in rates of compensation was defended by the minister of pensions on the ground that it reflected the differentiation between men's and women's wages in industry. See the minutes of the meeting between the minister of pensions and a deputation organized by the BFBPW, 30 January 1941. Public Record Office (P.R.O.), PIN 15/2302.

9 See the memorandum entitled ‘Progress report. Restrictions on non-essential industries’ included with the minutes of the Joint Consultative Committee of the ministry of labour, 29 May 1941. P.R.O., LAB 8/843.

10 Ministry of labour statistics cited in Inman, Peggy, Labour in the munitions industries (London, 1957), p. 80Google Scholar.

11 See the ‘memorandum’ resulting from the interdepartmental conference on the labour requirements of the proposed war programme, 13 December 1939. P.R.O., LAB 25/142.

12 War cabinet minutes, 18 January 1940. W.C. 17 (40) 1. P.R.O., CAB 65/5.

13 See the memorandum on manpower presented to the war cabinet by Brown on 20 February 1940. W.C. 47 (40) 1. P.R.O., CAB 65/5 and the re-assertion of his position in a subsequent memorandum to the war cabinet on 7 March 1940. P.R.O., LAB 25/143.

14 See the Caroline Haslett papers, NAEST 33/13.

15 ‘War and waste’, The Woman Engineer, v (December 1939), 14.

16 See the ‘Case presented by the women members of parliament of all parties to the Treasury’ by their deputation, 14 02 1940. Fawcett Library, typescriptGoogle Scholar.

17 Ibid. Also see The Times, 15 February 1940.

18 See Caroline Haslett's speech on ‘Women in wartime industry’ in the Caroline Haslett papers, NAEST 33/8.8.

19 A copy of the agreement with the AEU is printed as an appendix in Inman, , Labour in the munitions industries, pp. 441–2Google Scholar.

20 Irene Ward to Ernest Bevin, 24 May 1940. P.R.O., LAB 26/59.

21 Minutes of the Woman Power Committee, 11 July 1940. British Library of Political and Economic Science.

22 Minutes of the Woman Power Committee, 28 June 1940.

23 Minutes of the standing joint committee of Working Women's Organisations (SJSWWO) Executive, 25 July 1940. British Library.

24 Minutes of the SJCWWO General Purposes Committee, 5 June 1941. British Library.

25 Ellen Wilkinson to Ernest Bevin, 3 July 1940. P.R.O., LAB 26/59.

26 Report of the 11th annual conference of representatives of unions catering for women workers, 19 April 1941, p. 11. TUC Library.

27 See the memorandum to the lord privy seal from the WPC, 20 September 1940. P.R.O., LAB 26/59.

28 See the journal of the BFBPW, Women at work (November 1940), pp. 6–7.

29 Minutes of the Woman Power Committee, 8 August, 1940.

30 The remarks by Ward, and Astor, are cited in The Times, 22 08 1940, p. 2Google Scholar.

31 Memorandum to the lord privy seal from the WPC, 20 September 1940. P.R.O., LAB 26/59.

32 Minutes of the Woman Power Committee, 19 September 1940.

33 Ernest Bevin to Francis Perkins, 14 March 1942. Churchill College, Cambridge, Bevin papers, 3/3

34 See Ethel Wood to Ernest Bevin, 11 January 1941. P.R.O., LAB 26/59.

35 Minutes of the Woman Power Committee, 4 March 1941.

36 Parliamentary debates (house of commons), vol. 370, 20 03 1941Google Scholar, col. 326–8, 346.

37 Parker, H. M. D., Manpower: a study of war-time policy and administration (London, 1957), p. 282Google Scholar.

38 Memorandum by William Beveridge, 8 November 1940. P.R.O., CAB 118/65.

39 Gallup, George (ed.), The Gallup international opinion polls: Great Britain, 1937–1975, I (1937–1964) (London, 1976), 44Google Scholar.

40 Memorandum on ‘manpower’ by the lord president, 27 October 1941. W.P. (41) 247. P.R.O., CAB 66/19.

41 Memorandum on ‘manpower’ by Winston Churchill, 6 November 1941. W.P. (41) 258. P.R.O., CAB 66/19.

42 See the memorandum on manpower by Lord Beaverbrook, 20 November 1941 and Beaverbrook to Bevin, 25 November 1941. House of Lords Record Office, Beaverbrook papers, File BBK D/77.

43 Gallup, , The Gallup international opinion polls, p. 52Google Scholar.

44 Minutes of the Woman Power Committee, 28 October 1941.

45 Minutes of the Women's Consultative Committee, ministry of labour and national service, 26 November 1941. P.R.O., LAB 8/380.

46 Minutes of the war cabinet, 10 November 1941. W.M. 110 (41) 1. P.R.O., CAB 65/20.

47 See the remarks by Bevin, in the Report of the proceedings of the National Conference of Women called by H. M. Government, p. 3Google Scholar.

48 Report of the ministry of labour and national service, 1939–1946, Parliamentary Papers, 1946–47 (Cmd. 7225). P. 77.

49 See Hamilton, Mary A., Women at work (London, 1941), pp. 138–9Google Scholar.

50 Even employers admitted that a minority of women employed on men's work during the war received the man's rate of pay. See the ‘Memorandum of evidence submitted by the British Employers' Confederation’, British Library, minutes of evidence taken before the royal commission on equal pay, appendix VI, p. 54.

51 Inside the ministry of labour this policy was being urged by Verena Holmes. See her memorandum, ‘Women's wages on munitions work’, 12 March 1941. P.R.O., LAB 8/378.

52 Minutes of the TUC General Council, 4 February 1941. TUC archives.

53 See the testimony by Sir Thomas Phillips, secretary of the ministry of labour, on 17 December 1942 in the minutes of evidence included in the Report of the select committee on equal compensation, Parliamentary Papers, 1942–43, p. 30.

54 See the AEU memorandum published as appendix VIII to the Report of the royal commission on equal pay, Parliamentary Papers, 1945–46 (Cmnd. 6937), p. 77.

55 Gallup, , The Gallup international opinion polls, p. 47Google Scholar.

56 On the equal pay issue see the article by Smith, Harold on ‘The problem of “equal pay for equal work” in Great Britain during World War II’, cited above (n. 6)Google Scholar.

57 Memorandum by Day, A. J. T. on ‘Compensation for the increased cost of living’, 10 02 1941Google Scholar. P.R.O., T162/861/E. 40343/2.

58 Minutes of the National Whitley Council, 5 February 1941. P.R.O., T162/861/E. 40343/2.

59 W. Pym to H. Parker, 29 March 1941. P.R.O., T162/861/E. 40343/3.

60 E. H. Ritson to W. Pym, 13 April 1941. P.R.O., T162/861/E. 40343/3.

61 See the minutes of the BBC Control Board, 12 March to 7 May 1941. BBC Written Archives Centre, R3/3/16.

62 See W. J. Haley, director general of the BBC, to the secretary of the royal commission on equal pay, 26 April 1945. BBC, File R 49/177. Another example of increased sex differentiation during the war is that of the London County Council, which had an equal pay system prior to the war, but which adopted the civil service principle of sex-differentiated war bonus when the war broke out.

63 Minutes of the Woman Power Committee, 24 February and 4 August, 1942.

64 Minutes of the Woman Power Committee, 2 March 1943.

65 C. Attlee to I. Ward, 25 May 1943. P.R.O., CAB 118/75.

66 Report of the 18th annual conference of unions catering for women workers, April 1943, p. 25.

67 Report of the proceedings of the National Conference of Women called by H.M. Government, p. 41.

68 A copy of the report exists in the G. D. H. Cole papers at Nuffield College, Oxford. See file B 3/4/c, folio 8.

69 S. Cripps to W. Jowitt, 3 September 1942. P.R.O., CAB 117/151.

70 W. Jowitt to S. Cripps, 9 October 1942. P.R.O., CAB 117/151.

71 Report of the war cabinet committee on post-war internal economic problems, 22 September 1942. I.E.P. (42) 41. P.R.O., CAB 87/56.

72 Thomas, Geoffrey, Women at work. Wartime social survey (06 1944), p. 2Google Scholar.

73 See the discussion of opinion on employment policy within the government in MacLeod, R. J., ‘The development of full employment policy, 1938–1945’ (Ph.D. diss., Nuffield College, Oxford, 1979). PP. 227–46Google Scholar.

74 See the comments by Miss Watts, chairman of the London and National Society for Women's Service, in the minutes of the LNSWS executive committee, 30 May 1945. Fawcett Library.

75 See the remarks by Tanner, J., AEU President, in the Report of the proceedings of the fourth annual [AEU] Women's Conference (London, 1946), p. 9Google Scholar.

76 Ibid. 13.

77 See The Economist, CL (20 04 1946), 651–2Google Scholar and the Proceedings of the conference of representatives of the Engineering and Allied Employees Federation and the AEU, 15 04 1946, p. 13Google Scholar.

78 AEU, Proceedings of the 27th national committee (London, 1945), p. 55Google Scholar.

79 See appendix VIII to the Report of the royal commission on equal pay, paragraph 17.

80 Ferguson, S. M. and Fitzgerald, K., Studies in the social services (London, 1954), p. 211Google Scholar.

81 Calder, Angus, The people's war (London, 1969), p. 449Google Scholar.

82 See G. Ince to Miss Sutherland, 4 December 1940. P.R.O., LAB 26/57.

83 P.R.O., MH 55/695. Cited in Riley, Denise, ‘“The free mothers”: pronatalism and working women in industry at the end of the last war in Britain’, History Workshop, XI (spring 1981), 72Google Scholar.

84 Minutes of the Woman Power Committee, 10 April, 1945.

85 See Riley, Denise, ‘The free mothers’, p. 73Google Scholar.

86 Partington, Godfrey, Women teachers in the twentieth century (London, 1976), p. 51Google Scholar.

87 Minutes of the National Union of Women Teachers Central Council, 23 October 1943 and the NUWT, Annual report, 1942 (London, 1943), p. 3Google Scholar.

88 Minutes of the Woman Power Committee, 28 September to 7 December 1943.

89 See the newsletter of the National Council of Women, Women in council, XLV (03 1944), 1Google Scholar.

90 See the updated memorandum on the amendment to clause 23 of the Education Bill by the secretary of the board of education in P.R.O., Ed 136/480.

91 Memorandum on the amendment to Clause 23 of the Education Bill by Chuter Ede, 6 March 1944. P.R.O., Ed 136/480.

92 Ibid.

93 Ibid. In his 7 March memorandum to John Anderson, Butler cites Chuter Ede's arguments in favour of ending the marriage bar, thus implying that these influenced his decision to support reform. See Butler to Anderson, 7 March 1944. P.R.O., Ed 136/467.

94 Minutes of the Woman Power Committee, 27 February 1945 and Women at work, XVIII (spring 1945), 9Google Scholar.

95 Minutes of the Woman Power Committee, 13 March 1945.

96 Report of the civil service National Whitley Council committee on the marriage bar, Parliamentary Papers, 1945–46 (Cmd. 6886).

97 Cabinet minutes, 9 September 1946. Cabinet 80 (46) 6. P.R.O., CAB 128/6.

98 Marwick, , War and social change, p. 160Google Scholar.

99 The source which Marwick cites makes no reference at all to the marriage bar. See the appendix to the Report on pensions of unestablished civil servants, Parliamentary Papers, 1945–46 (Cmnd. 6942). From his remarks it appears that he is referring to the appendīx to the Report of the civil service National Whitley Council committee on the marriage bar cited above.

100 The shortage became so severe that in 1947 the ministry of labour initiated an organized campaign to persuade women to seek employment. See Thomas, Geoffrey, Women and industry (London, 1948), p. 1Google Scholar.

101 Only 10.4 per cent of married women were employed in 1931, but by 1947 this had increased to about 18 per cent. P.E.P., ‘Employment of women’, Planning, xv (23 07 1948), 39Google Scholar. Due in part to the declining birth rate during the 1930s there were one million fewer women in the age group 14–24 in 1951 than in 1931. The post-war increase in the marriage rate further reduced the number of young single women available for work, thus increasing the pressure on employers to hire married women. See Halsey, A. H., ed., Trends in British society since 1900 (London, 1972), p. 117CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

102 A recent exception is Croucher, Richard, Engineers at war (London, 1982)Google Scholar.