Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:42:25.704Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Report on Overlap Methods in Photographic Astrometry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2016

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The usual procedure for deriving standard coordinates ξ,η from the measured rectangular coordinates x, y of a star is to adopt a suitable model for the relationship between the measured x, y, magnitude m, color index c and the ξ, η. This relationship may, in general, be written as

From the known standard coordinates ξr, ηr of some reference stars equally distributed over the plate area, the unknown plate constants aijkl, bijkl are found from a least-squares adjustment. After the adjustment the standard coordinates of each field star can be computed. In most cases a statistical criterion for the choice of the proper form of the above relationship between measured and standard coordinates may be useful because the systematic accuracy, obtained from the adjustment, may be seriously affected by the number of unknown parameters included. (Eichhorn et al., 1967). If the same star occurs on two or more plates, i.e. the plates being partly overlapped, one gets the final position by taking the mean of the individual positions on each plate. In this procedure, no direct account is taken of the ‘overlap’ in the equations of condition for the desired plate constants.

Type
Joint Discussions
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1968

References

Clube, S.V.M. (1967) Private Communication.Google Scholar
de Vegt, Chr. (1967) Astr. Nachr., 290 (in press).Google Scholar
Eichhorn, H. (1960) Astr. Nachr., 285, 233.Google Scholar
Eichhorn, H. (1963) Private Communication.Google Scholar
Eichhorn, H., Googe, W.D., Gatewood, G. (1967a) Astr. J., 72, 626.Google Scholar
Eichhorn, H., Gatewood, G.D. (1967a) Astr. J. (in press).Google Scholar
Faddeev, D.K., Faddeeva, V.N. (1964) Numerische Methoden der linearen Algebra.Google Scholar
Googe, W.D. (1967) Astr. J., 72, 623.Google Scholar
Henricksen, S.W. (1967) Astr. J., 72, 603.Google Scholar
Jefferys, H. III (1963) Astr. J., 68, 111.Google Scholar
König, A. (1933) Handbuch der Astrophysik, 1, 508ff.Google Scholar
Lacroute, P. (1964) Ann. Obs. Strasbourg, 6.Google Scholar
Levenberg, K. (1944) Quart. of Appl. Math., 2.Google Scholar
Lukac, C.F. (1967) Astr. J., 72, 620.Google Scholar
Zadunaisky, P. (1957) I.B.M. Watson Lab. Report. Google Scholar