Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T11:54:51.711Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

William Maker, Philosophy Without Foundations: Rethinking Hegel (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994), pp. 298. ISBN 0-7914-2100-7.

Review products

William Maker, Philosophy Without Foundations: Rethinking Hegel (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994), pp. 298. ISBN 0-7914-2100-7.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2015

Paul Ashton*
Affiliation:
La Trobe and, Victoria University
Get access

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © The Hegel Society of Great Britain 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 Most will be aware of the links between Maker and Winfield and Dove.

2 Perhaps the most significant chapter, ‘Beginning Philosophy Without “Beginnings’” is a reproduction of Maker, William, ‘Beginning’, in Di Giovanni, George (ed.), Essays on Hegel's Logic (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1990), pp. 2744 Google Scholar.

3 Maker further develops the idea of an Hegelian Critical Theory in Maker, William, ‘The Science of Freedom: Hegel's Critical Theory’, Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain, vol. 41/42 (2000), pp. 117 Google Scholar.

4 Heidegger, Martin, Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. Emad, Parvis and Maly, Kenneth (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1994), pp. 1 Google Scholar.

5 Harris, H. S., Hegel: Phenomenology and System (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1995), pp. 104 Google Scholar.

6 Heidegger, , Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit, p. 30 Google Scholar.

7 Ibid.

8 This point is made in an unpublished thesis by Vassilacopoulos, George, ‘A Reading of Hegel's Philosophy’, Ph.D thesis (La Trobe University, 1993), pp. 88–9 n.4Google Scholar. H.S. Harris has also made appeal to Vassilacopoulos' critique of Maker's ‘negative’ reading of the Phenomenology in Harris, H. S., Hegel's Ladder, vol. 2 (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1996), p. 175 n.20Google Scholar.

9 This passage is cited in Vassilacopoulos, , ‘A Reading of Hegel's Philosophy’, pp. 88–9 n.4Google Scholar.

10 Maker, William, ‘The Very Idea of the Idea of Nature, or Why Hegel is not an Idealist’, in Houlgate, Stephen (ed.), Hegel and the Philosophy of Nature (New York: State University of New York Press, 1998), pp. 127 Google Scholar.

11 His account of the role of finitude is taken up again in later chapters where he discusses Marx and Gadamer's relation to Hegel.