Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T08:04:39.571Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

What needs to be done in contingent valuation: have Smith and Sach missed the boat?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2010

Rachel Baker
Affiliation:
Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, UK
Gillian R. Currie
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatrics and Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Canada
Cam Donaldson*
Affiliation:
Institute of Health and Society, and Business School, Newcastle University, UK and Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Canada
*
Correspondence to: Professor Cam Donaldson, Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, 21 Claremont Place, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AA, UK. Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Response
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acton, J. P. (1976), Evaluating Public Programmes to Save Lives: The Case of Heart Attacks, Santa Monica: Rand Corporation.Google Scholar
Bateman, I., Carson, R. T., Day, B., Hanemann, W. M., Hanley, N., Hett, T., Jones-Lee, M., Loomes, G., Mourato, S., Özdemiroglu, E., Pearce, D., Sugden, R.Swanson, J. (2002), Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: A Manual, London: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouwer, W. B. F., Rutten, F. F. H. (2005), ‘Defining the Basic Benefits Package (in Dutch: De afbakening van het basispakket)’, Background Report for the Council for Public Health and Health Care (RVZ), Den Haag.Google Scholar
Currie, G. R., Donaldson, C., Lee, H. (2005), ‘Using Mixed Methods to Explore the Issue of Scope Sensitivity in Contingent Valuation’, Health Economists’ Study Group (HESG), University of Newcastle upon Tyne.Google Scholar
Donaldson, C. (1990), ‘Willingness to pay for publicly-provided goods: a possible measure of benefit?’, Journal of Health Economics, 9: 103118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donaldson, C. (1999), ‘Valuing the benefits of publicly-provided health care: does “ability to pay” preclude the use of “willingness to pay”?’, Social Science and Medicine, 49: 551563.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donaldson, C. (2001), ‘Eliciting patients’ values by use of “willingness to pay”: letting the theory drive the method’, Health Expectations, 4: 180188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donaldson, C.Shackley, P. (1997), ‘Does “process utility” exist? A case study of willingness to pay for laparoscopic cholecystectomy’, Social Science and Medicine, 44: 699707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, C.Shackley, P. (2003), ‘Willingness to Pay for Health Care’, in A. Scott, A. Maynard and R. Elliott (eds), Advances in Health Economics, London: John Wiley, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
Donaldson, C., Birch, S.Gafni, A. (2002), ‘The pervasiveness of the “distribution problem” in economic evaluation in health care’, Health Economics, 11: 5570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, C., Mason, H.Shackley, P. (2006a), ‘Contingent Valuation in Health Care’, in A. Jones (ed.), The Elgar Companion to Health Economics, Cheltenham: Elgar.Google Scholar
Donaldson, C., Shackley, P., Currie, G. (2006b), ‘Ordering disparate health programmes through explicit ranking versus willingness to pay: “sticky wicket” or “sticking with it” ’, Paper presented to Health Economists’ Study Group, City University, London.Google Scholar
Donaldson, C., Thomas, R.Torgerson, D. J. (1998), ‘Validity of open-ended and payment scale approaches to eliciting willingness to pay’, Applied Economics, 29: 7984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drummond, M. F.Jefferson, T. on behalf of the BMJ Economic Evaluation Working Party (1997), ‘Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ’, British Medical Journal, 313: 275283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frew, E., Whynes, D.Wolstenholme, J. (2003), ‘Eliciting willingness to pay: comparing closed-ended with open-ended and payment scale formats’, Medical Decision Making, 23: 150159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gafni, A. (1991), ‘Willingness to pay as a measure of benefits: relevant questions in the context of public decision making about health care programmes’, Medical Care, 29: 12461252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gold, M. R., Siegel, J. E., Russell, L. B.Weinstein, M. C. (1996), Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gyrd-Hansen, D. (2003), ‘Willingness to pay for a QALY’, Health Economics, 12: 10491060.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gyrd-Hansen, D. (2004), ‘Investigating the social value of health changes’, Journal of Health Economics, 23(6): 11011116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hsee, C. K., Loewenstein, G. F., Blount, S.Bazerman, M. H. (1999), ‘Preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of options: a review and theoretical analysis’, Psychological Bulletin, 125(5): 941973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johannesson, M.Jonsson, B. (1991), ‘Economic evaluation in health care: is there a role for cost–benefit analysis?’, Health Policy, 17: 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johannesson, M., Jonsson, B.Borgquist, L. (1991), ‘Willingness to pay for anti-hypertensive therapy – results of a Swedish pilot study’, Journal of Health Economics, 10: 461474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, B.Gafni, A. (1996), ‘When do the “dollars” make sense? Toward a conceptual framework for contingent valuation studies in health care’, Medical Decision Making, 16: 288299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, J. A., Donaldson, C. (1998), ‘Helicopters, hearts and hips: using willingness to pay to set priorities for public sector health care programmes’, Social Science and Medicine, 46: 112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olsen, J. A., Donaldson, C.Periera, J. (2004a), ‘The insensitivity of “willingness to pay” to the size of the good: new evidence for health care’, Journal of Economic Psychology, 25: 445460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, J. A., Kidholm, K., Donaldson, C.Shackley, P. (2004b), ‘Willingness to pay for public health care: a comparison of two approaches’, Health Policy, 70: 217228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, J. A., Donaldson, C.Shackley, P. and the EuroWill Group (2005), ‘Implicit vs explicit ranking: on inferring ordinal preferences for health care programmes based on differences in willingness-to-pay’, Journal of Health Economics, 24: 990996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Shea, E., Stewart, J., Donaldson, C.Shackley, P. (2002), ‘Eliciting preferences for resource allocation for health care’, Economic and Social Review, 32: 217238.Google Scholar
Protière, C., Donaldson, C., Luchini, S., Moatti, J. P.Shackley, P. (2004), ‘The impact of information on non-health attributes on willingness to pay for multiple health care programmes’, Social Science and Medicine, 58: 12571269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryan, M., Scott, D.Donaldson, C. (2004), ‘Valuing health care using willingness to pay: a comparison of the payment card and dichotomous choice methods’, Journal of Health Economics, 23: 237258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shackley, P.Donaldson, C. (2000), ‘Willingness to pay for publicly-financed health care: how should we use the numbers?’, Applied Economics, 32(15): 20152021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shackley, P.Donaldson, C. (2002), ‘Using willingness to pay to elicit community preferences for health care: is an incremental approach the way forward?’, Journal of Health Economics, 21: 971991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, J., O’Shea, E., Donaldson, C.Shackley, P. (2002), ‘Do ordering effects matter in willingness to pay studies of health care?’, Journal of Health Economics, 21: 585599.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed