Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 September 2009
Euripides' Medea has penetrated to parts of modernity most mythical figures have not reached. Since she first rolled off the printing presses half a millennium ago, she has inspired hundreds of performances, plays, paintings, and operas. Medea has murdered her way into a privileged place in the history of the imagination of the West, and can today command huge audiences in the commercial theatre. Yet in Britain, at least, her popularity on the stage is a relatively recent phenomenon. Medea has transcended history partly because she enacts a primal terror universal to human beings: that the motherfigure should intentionally destroy her own children. Yet this dimension of the ancient tragedy was until the twentieth century found so disturbing as largely to prevent unadapted performances. On the British stage it was not until 1907 that Euripides' Medea was performed, without alteration, in English translation.
1. For the growing literature on the reception of Medea see, e.g., Mimoso-Ruiz, Duarte, Médée Antique et Moderne: Aspects rituels et socio-politiques d'un mythe (Paris, 1982)Google Scholar; ‘Medea’ in Reid, Jane Davidson, The Oxford Guide to Classical Mythology in the Arts, 1300–1900s, vol. 2 (Oxford, 1993), 643–50Google Scholar; Uglione, Renato (ed.), Atti delle Giornate di Studio su Medea, Torino 23–24 Ottobre 1995 (Turin, 1997).Google Scholar; Clauss, James J. and Johnston, Sarah Iles (edd.), Medea (Princeton, 1997), 3–5Google Scholar.
2. See Macintosh, Fiona, ‘Tragedy in Performance: Nineteenth and Twentieth-century Productions’ in Easterling, P. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Greek Tragedy (Cambridge, 1997), 284–323, at 302–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
3. Kennedy, Dennis, Granville Barker and the Dream of Theatre (Cambridge, 1985), 5Google Scholar.
4. The Clarion 19th April 1970, 3.
5. Purdon, C. B., Harley Granville Barker: Man of the Theatre, Dramatist and Scholar (London, 1955), 54Google Scholar.
6. Salter, W. H., Essays on Two Moderns (London, 1911), 9Google Scholar.
7. See, e.g., Salter (10) who calls Euripides ‘Pro-Boer’.
8. See Macintosh, , ‘The Shavian Murray and the Euripidean Shaw: Major Barbara and the Bacchae’, Classics Ireland 5 (1998), 64–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
9. See Wilson, Duncan, Gilbert Murray OM, 1866–1957 (Oxford, 1987), 181Google Scholar.
10. Thorndike, Sibyl, ‘Gilbert Murray and Some Actors’ in Thomson, J. A. K. and Toynbee, A. J. (edd.), Essays in Honour of Gilbert Murray (London, 1936), 74Google Scholar.
11. Purdon, , op. cit, 71Google Scholar. Sophocles' Oedipus Tyrannus was refused a licence on similar grounds until 1910: see Macintosh, , ‘Under the Blue Pencil: Greek Tragedy and the British Censor’, Dialogos 2 (1995), 54–70Google Scholar.
12. Salmon, Eric (ed.), Granville Barker and his Correspondents: a Selection of Letters by Him and to Him (Detroit, 1986), 239Google Scholar.
13. Flashar, H., Inszenierung der Antike; das griechische Drama auf der Bühne der Neuzeit (Munich, 1991), 124–6Google Scholar.
14. Atkinson, Diane, The Suffragettes in Pictures (Stroud, 1996), 127Google Scholar.
15. Pankhurst, E. Sylvia, The Suffragette Movement (London/New York/Toronto, 1931), 223Google Scholar; Morgan, David, Suffragists and Liberals (Oxford, 1975), 46Google Scholar.
16. Stowell, Sheila, A Stage of their Own: Feminist Playwrights of the Suffrage Era (Manchester, 1992), 2–5, 9–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
17. Quoted in Stowell, 12, from the Vedrenne/Robins correspondence at the Harry Ransom Humanities Research Centre, University of Texas at Austin.
18. Illustrated London News (hereafter ILN) 130, no. 3547 (13/4/1907), 546.
19. ILN 131, no. 3575 (26/10/1907), 588.
20. ILN 130, no. 3546 (6/4/1907), 518. See Devlin, Diana, A Speaking Part: Lewis Casson and the Theatre of his Time (London, 1982), 43Google Scholar.
21. See the catalogue in Atkinson, Diane, Suffragettes in the Purple, White, and Green: London 1906–14 (London, 1992), 65–6Google Scholar.
22. Euripides and his Age (London, 1913), 32Google Scholar.
23. Holledge, Julie, Innocent Flowers: Women in the Edwardian Theatre (London, 1981), 60–1, 80–1Google Scholar.
24. The Medea of Euripides (London, 1906), 86Google Scholar.
25. Tickner, Lisa, The Spectacle of Women: Imagery of the Suffrage Campaign 1907–14 (London, 1987), 130Google Scholar; Pankhurst, , op. cit., 284Google Scholar.
26. Tickner, ibid., 254. The banner is reproduced in Atkinson, Suffragettes in Purple, 55.
27. Quoted in Purdon, 72–3.
28. Letter to Murray, 14/12/1904, in Salmon, , op. cit., 231Google Scholar.
29. West, Francis, Gilbert Murray: a Life (London/Canberra/New York, 1984), 93Google Scholar.
30. Andromache (London, 1900)Google Scholar; West, ibid., 87.
31. McCarthy, Liliah, Myself and Friends (London, 1933), 293–5Google Scholar.
32. Stowell, , op. cit., 4–5Google Scholar.
33. The Medea, 61.
34. The Graphic 76, no. 1978 (26/10/1907), 567.
35. The Medea, 94.
36. Hamilton, Cicely, Marriage as Trade (London, 1909), 210–13Google Scholar.
37. Pankhurst, , op. cit., 225–6Google Scholar.
38. Pankhurst, , op. cit., 225–6Google Scholar.
39. Boas, Frederick S., University Drama in the Tudor Age (Oxford, 1914), appendix 4Google Scholar; Euripides' Medea may have been performed in Latin at Westminster School in the 1540s: see Smith, Bruce R., Ancient Scripts and Modern Experience on the English Stage 1500–1700 (Princeton, 1988), 201, 205Google Scholar.
40. For the probable influence of Seneca's Medea on Shakespeare, see Purkiss, Diane, The Witch in History (London/New York, 1996), 259Google Scholar. Fiona Macintosh points out to me that lines and sentiments identical to some in Euripides' Medea are spoken by both Livia and Isabella in Thomas Middleton's Women Beware Women (c.1620). The anonymous female author of a tragedy featuring an oriental murderess acted at Lincoln's-Inn Fields in 1698 knew Euripides' Medea: ‘A Young Lady’, The Unnatural Mother, the Scene in the Kingdom of Siam (London, 1698), 49Google Scholar.
41. Fitzgerald, Edward, Letter of 16/6/1872 in his Letters and Literary Remains, Wright, William Aldis (ed.) (London/New York, 1889), vol. 1, 340Google Scholar.
42. Anon, . Medea in Corinto (Medea in Corinth), a Tragic Opera in Two Acts. The Music by the Celebrated Meyer. The Translation in Easy Verse (London, 1826)Google Scholar.
43. Diaries, Reminiscences, and Correspondence (London, 1872), vol. 2, 56Google Scholar.
44. Jackson, Mark, New-Born Child Murder: Women, Illegitimacy and the Courts in Eighteenth-Century England (Manchester, 1996), 110–12Google Scholar.
45. Hiffernan, Paul, Dramatic Genius in Five Books (London, 1770), Book 2, 57Google Scholar.
46. Phaeton; or, The Fatal Divorce (London, 1698), ‘Preface’Google Scholar.
47. The Tragedy of Medæa (London, 1731), viiiGoogle Scholar.
48. See further Hall, ‘Greek Tragedy as “She-Tragedy” in the 18th century’ (forthcoming).
49. British Library, Collection Relating to Sadler's Wells vol. 2 (1787–1795), nos. 102, 105, 109Google Scholar.
50. Noverre, M., Médée, Ballet Tragi-Pantomime (Paris, 1804), iii–ivGoogle Scholar; Guest, Ivor, The Romantic Ballet in England (London/Nairobi, second edition, 1972), 150Google Scholar.
51. Roberdeau, John, Fugitive Prose and Verse (London, second edition, 1804), 34 and nGoogle Scholar.
52. Jackson, Mark, op. cit., 40, 120–3Google Scholar.
53. Glover, , Medea in The New English Theatre vol. 12 (London, 1777), 3Google Scholar.
54. Glover, ibid., 48.
55. Although the Romantic poets were influenced by Medea (see, e.g., Wallace, Jennifer, Shelley and Greece [Basingstoke/London, 1997], 167–8)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, for a variety of social and aesthetic reasons hardly any Greek tragedy was performed in Britain, even in adaptation, between the French Revolution and the Greek War of Independence. See Hall, , ‘Greek Plays in Georgian Reading’, G & R 44 (1997), 59–81Google Scholar and ‘Sophocles’ Electra in Britain' in Griffin, J. and Parsons, P. (edd.), Sophocles Revisited: Studies in Honour of Sir Hugh Lloyd-Jones (forthcoming, Oxford, 1999)Google Scholar.
56. Shanley, Mary Lyndon, ‘“One must ride behind”: Married Women's Rights and the Divorce Act of 1857’, Victorian Studies 25 (1981–1982), 355–76, at 356–7 and n. 2Google Scholar.
57. Shanley, ibid., 357.
58. Wolfram, Sybil, In-Laws and Outlaws: Kinship and Marriage in England (London/Sydney, 1987), 147Google Scholar.
59. Shanley, , Feminism, Marriage and the Law in Victorian England 1850–1895 (London, 1989), 22–5Google Scholar; Chedzoy, Alan, A Scandalous Woman: the Life of Caroline Norton (London, 1992), 170–3Google Scholar.
60. Hall, , ‘Talfourd's Ancient Greeks in the Theatre of Reform’, IJCT 3 (1997), 283–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
61. See Stone, Lawrence, Road to Divorce: a History of the Making and Breaking of Marriage in England (Oxford/New York, 1995), 178Google Scholar.
62. See ‘Divorce’, The Law Review 1 (1844–1845), 353–81Google Scholar.
63. British Library Add. MSS 53203 M, written by J. Addison and J. Howell. On Classical burlesque see Hall, , ‘1845 and All That: Singing Greek Tragedy on the London Stage’ in Biddiss, M. and Wyke, M. (edd.), Uses and Abuses of Antiquity (forthcoming, 1999)Google Scholar.
64. Planché, , The Golden Fleece; or, Jason in Colchis and Medea in Corinth (London, 1845), 20–1Google Scholar.
65. Stone, , op. cit., 351Google Scholar.
66. ILN 6, no. 152 (29/3/1845), 200.
67. Appleton, William, Madame Vestris and the London Stage (New York/London, 1974), 159–61Google Scholar; Taylor, George, Players and Performances in the Victorian Theatre (Manchester/New York, 1989), 71–2Google Scholar.
68. Cretkovich, Ann, Mixed Feelings: Feminism, Mass Culture, and Victorian Sensationalism (New Brunswick, N.J., 1992), 46Google Scholar; Parker, Christopher (ed.), Gender Roles and Sexuality in Victorian Literature (Aldershot, 1995), 2Google Scholar.
69. Alcestis; the Original Strong-Minded Woman (London, 1850)Google Scholar.
70. British Library Add. MSS 43,036ff. 276–307.
71. Shanley, , ‘“One must ride behind”’, 361–3Google Scholar.
72. Shanley, , Feminism, 158Google Scholar.
73. ILN 29, no. 811 (19/7/1856), 65. The reviewer was probably John Heraud (see below).
74. Legouvé, , Sixty Years of Recollections (London/Sydney, 1893), vol. 2, 47–8Google Scholar.
75. Ward, Geneviève and Whiting, Richard, Both Sides of the Curtain (London/New York/Toronto/Melbourne, 1918), 187Google Scholar.
76. Memoirs and Artistic Studies of Madame Ristori (London, 1907), 175Google Scholar.
77. Ibid., 175.
78. Ibid., 42–3, 59, 72, 80, 107. The translation, by Joseph Montanelli, was published to accompany Ristori's London performance, offering a parallel English version by Williams, Thomas: Medea: a Tragedy in Three Acts (London, 1856)Google Scholar.
79. Ibid., 179–81.
80. On Actors and the Art of Acting (London, 1875), 44, 145Google Scholar.
81. Medea: a Tragedy in One Act, British Library Add. MSS 52,960L.
82. Ibid., 6.
83. Ibid., 13–14, 17.
84. ILN 29, no. 811 (19/7/1856), 65.
85. Sands, Mollie, Robson of the Olympic (London, 1979), 77Google Scholar; Sala, George Augustus, Robson: a Sketch (London, 1864), 49Google Scholar.
86. The Journal of a London Playgoer (London, 1866), 95–9, 159Google Scholar.
87. Letters (London, 1893), vol. 1, 451Google Scholar.
88. The Freeman's Journal, quoted in Sands, , op. cit., 79Google Scholar; Sala, , op. cit., 19, 49Google Scholar.
89. ILN 29, no. 811 (19/7/1856), 65.
90. For the programme see Brough, , Medea; or the Best of Mothers, with a Brute of a Husband. A Burlesque (London, 1856)Google Scholar. The joke refers to yet another legislative controversy concerned with marriage, the long-running attempt to remove the ban on a man marrying his deceased wife's sister. Bills on this issue had been debated and defeated in both 1849 and 1856. See Shanley, Feminism, 41.
91. Brough, 8–10.
92. Brough, 11.
93. Brough, 22–3, 33.
94. Hartman, Mary S., Victorian Murderesses (London, 1985), 52–4Google Scholar.
95. For a detailed account see Shanley, , Feminism, 35–44Google Scholar.
96. Boase, G. C., ‘John Abraham Heraud’, Dictionary of National Biography 9 (1908), 616Google Scholar.
97. Heraud, Edith, Memoirs of John A. Heraud (London, 1898), 91Google Scholar.
98. Edith Heraud, ibid., 128–9.
99. ILN 31, no. 873 (15/8/1857), 163; ILN 31, no. 876 (29/8/1857), 219.
100. Jackson, Allan Stuart, The Standard Theatre of Victorian London (London/Toronto, 1993), 6, 112, 124Google Scholar.
101. Heraud, Edith, op. cit., 128–9Google Scholar.
102. Heraud, John, Medea in Corinth, British Library Add. MSS 52967X, 17–18Google Scholar.
103. John Heraud, ibid., 18.
104. John Heraud, ibid., 20–5.
105. John Heraud, ibid., 22.
106. Davidoff, L. and Hall, C., Family Fortunes: Men and Women of the English Middle Class 1780–1850 (London, 1987), 149Google Scholar.
107. Heraud, John, op. cit., 31Google Scholar.
108. ILN 61, no. 1714 (13/7/1872), 43; Arundel, Dennis, The Story of Sadler's Wells 1683–1964 (London, 1965), 164Google Scholar.
109. Shanley, , ‘“One must ride behind”’, 356Google Scholar.
110. Munich, Adrienne, Adromeda's Chains: Gender and Interpretation in Victorian Literature and Art (New York, 1989), 32–7Google Scholar.
111. See the edition by S. Mansfield (Arlington Heights, Illinois, 1980).
112. Shanley, , Feminism, 14Google Scholar.
113. Hogan, John (ed.), The Medea of Euripides (London, 1873), xxvGoogle Scholar.
114. Blew, William John, Medea, from the Tragedy of Euripides (London, 1887), ixGoogle Scholar.
115. The Medea of Euripides, Literally Translated into English Verse (London/Cambridge, 1868)Google Scholar and Portraits (London, second edition, 1870), 1–13Google Scholar. See Hardwick, Lorna, ‘Women and Classical Scholarship in the 19th Century’, CA News no. 17 (12 1997), 2–4Google Scholar.On Webster's political activity see Leighton, Angela, Victorian Women Poets (Hemel Hempstead, 1992), 164–201Google Scholar.
116. Jenkyns, Richard, The Victorians and Ancient Greece (Oxford, 1980), 115–17, 125–7Google Scholar.
117. Hartman, , op. cit., 263Google Scholar.
118. Altick, Robert, Victorian Studies in Scarlet (New York, 1970), 42Google Scholar.
119. Cretkovich, , op. cit., 15–22Google Scholar. For a discussion of Lady Audley's Secret see Bernstein, Susan David, Confessional Subjects: Revelations of Gender and Power in Victorian Literature and Culture (Chapel Hill/London, 1997), 73–103Google Scholar.
120. Showalter, Elaine, A Literature of their Own: British Women Novelists from Brontë to Lessing (Princeton, 1977), 182Google Scholar.
121. Cvetkovich, , op. cit., 112–13Google Scholar.
122. Showalter, , op. cit., 182–3Google Scholar.
123. Auerbach, Nina, Private Theatricals: the Lives of the Victorians (Cambridge, Mass./London, 1990), 24, 96CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
124. Shanley, , Feminism, 87, 90Google Scholar.
125. Hoffer, Peter C. and Hull, N. E. H., Murdering Mothers: Infanticide in England and New England 1558–1803 (New York/London, 1984), 159–60Google Scholar; see also Rose, Lionel, The Massacre of the Innocents: Infanticide in Britain 1800–1939 (London/Boston/Henley, 1986), 35–45Google Scholar.
126. ILN 28, no. 804 (7/6/1856), 619.
127. ILN 38, no. 1086 (27/4/1861), 389. Heron, Matilda, Medea (London, 1861)Google Scholar.
128. Scott, Clement and Howard, Cecil, The Life and Reminiscences of E. L. Blanchard (London, 1891), vol. 1, 256Google Scholar; see also ILN 38, no. 1086 (17/4/1861), 389.
129. ILN 39, no. 1116 (9/11/1861), 469; Blanchard, vol. 1, 263Google Scholar.
130. Lemon, 16.
131. Anon, . Medea, British Library Add. MSS 53167E, 21Google Scholar.
132. Kestner, Joseph, Mythology and Misogyny: the Social Discourse of Nineteenth-Century British Classical-Subject Painting (Madison, 1989), 40, 45, 55–6, 170Google Scholar.
133. Maude, Cyril, The Haymarket Theatre (London, 1903), 161–2Google Scholar.
134. Rose, , op. cit., 76–7Google Scholar; see also Wilson, Patrick, Murderess (London, 1971)Google Scholar. One Rebecca Smith had been executed in 1849 after admitting to killing no fewer than eight of her children (Rose, 76).
135. Blanchard, vol. 2, 414Google Scholar.
136. ILN 61, no. 1715 (20/7/1872), 65.
137. ILN 61, no. 1714 (13/7/1872), 43.
138. Unfortunately this critic is not named in the source citing these words: Wills, Freeman, W. G. Wills, Dramatist and Painter (London/New York/Bombay, 1898), 90Google Scholar.
139. Wills, W. G., Medea, a Tragedy in 3 Acts, British Library Add. MSS 53110N, 5, 16, 11–12Google Scholar.
140. Ward, and Whiting, , op. cit., 62, 117–20Google Scholar.
141. Gustafson, Zadel B., Genevieve Ward: a Biographical Sketch (London, 1881), 119, 130Google Scholar.
142. Ward, G., ‘Medea's big boy’, The Era Almanack (1881), 127–8Google Scholar. Another American, Charles Bristed, who studied Classics at Cambridge in the 1840s, was scandalized by the treatment of women in England. It was the standard practice of English gentlemen, he writes, to abuse workingclass women sexually, and he has seen more brutality to women than in any other European country except Russia. ‘The cases of aggravated assault and battery upon women that come before the London police-magistrates are positively startling in number and degree’ Bristed, Charles, Five Years in an English University [New York, second edition 1852, 347 and n.]Google Scholar.
143. See Macintosh, ‘Tragedy in Performance’ (n. 2); Easterling, P. E., ‘The Early Years of the Cambridge Greek Play’ in Stray, Christopher (ed.), Classics at Cambridge (Cambridge, 1999, a forthcoming PCPS supplement)Google Scholar.
144. See Thorndike, , op. cit., 69–77Google Scholar. Devlin, Diana, A Speaking Part: Lewis Casson and the Theatre of his Time (London, 1982), 128, 153, 165, 169Google Scholar.
145. See, e.g., Rowell, George, The Old Vic Theatre: a History (Cambridge, 1993), 142–3 on a production in 1941Google Scholar; Medea, directed by John Gielgud, was also the first Greek tragedy to be performed at the Edinburgh Festival: Bruce, George, Festival in the North (London, 1975), 136–7, 142Google Scholar.
146. See the photograph in Hall, , ‘Literature and Performance’ in Cartledge, P. (ed.), The Cambridge Illustrated History of Ancient Greece (Cambridge, 1997), 219–9, at 222Google Scholar. See also the controversial discussion by Golder, Herbert, ‘Geek tragedy? – or, why I'd rather go to the movies’, Arion 4 (1996), 174–209Google Scholar.
147. Heartfelt thanks for advice and criticism go to Oliver Taplin, Paul Cartledge, and especially, as always, Fiona Macintosh.