Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T04:58:04.196Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Latin Literature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 September 2014

Extract

Anyone who has ever taught or studied the Aeneid will be familiar with student gripes that the protagonist, Aeneas, does not meet their expectations of a hero: stolid, boring, wooden, uninspiring, lacking in emotional range. Likewise, students of Lucan's Civil War often find it hard to get a handle on the figure of Cato, and his hard-line heroics are usually met with a combination of disbelieving horror and ridicule. The important and deceptively simple suggestion of J. Mira Seo's new monograph is that such apparently two-dimensional and unsatisfactory ‘problem characters’ in Latin literature (19) are the result not of the failure of the ancient poets to depict their protagonists successfully, but rather of the different expectations that Romans held about literary characterization. Her book sets out to explore the possibility that Roman writers were not attempting to present characters who are psychologically ‘rounded’ in the way that we moderns expect, with our Cartesian approach and our high regard for radical individuality and subjectivity. Rather, she argues, Roman characterization was based on a distinctively Roman approach to self as ‘aemulatory, referential, and circumscribed by traditional expectations of society’ (15). For Seo, characterization is a literary technique (4) rather than mimetic of real people (5) and, like genre, characters in literature are established through reference to earlier material. Indeed, characterization is a form of allusion, and characters in literature are ‘nodes of intertextuality’ (4) created out of generic expectation and familiar schemata, and the significant and creative modification of these. This technique is often evident in ancient literature (the intertextuality of Virgil's depiction of Dido is well known); however Seo pursues its implications through close readings of five case studies: Virgil's Aeneas, created through the conflicting voices of fama, with effeminate Paris as his ghostly doppelganger; Cato as Lucan's lethal exemplum; Seneca's Oedipus, becoming ‘himself’ under the pressure of decorum and the literary tradition; and two of Statius' most stereotypical and over-determined characters, the archetypal ‘doomed beautiful youth’, exquisitely intensified in the figure of Parthenopaus, and the doomed prophet Ampharius. In her series of illuminating and insightful readings, Seo shows how such characters are built up through schematization, through articulation from a variety of perspectives in the texts, and through the evocation and skilful modification of familiar literary motifs. Although I am not sure she has entirely cracked the problem of Roman characterization, her book opens up a stimulating new approach to Roman poetry and characterization, which I hope will inspire others to take up the call for more research in this area.

Type
Subject Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Exemplary Traits. Reading Characterization in Roman Poetry. By Seo, J. Mira. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Pp. xi + 220. Hardback £47.99, ISBN 978-0-19-973428-3.

2 Tragedy in Ovid. Theater, Metatheater, and the Transformation of a Genre. By Curley, Dan. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2013CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Pp. xi + 275. Hardback £60, ISBN: 978-1-107-00953-0.

3 Ovid's Revisions. The Editor as Author. By Martelli, Francesca K. A.. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2013CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Pp. xii + 260. Hardback £55, ISBN: 978-1-107-03771-7.

4 Memory in Vergil's Aeneid. Creating the Past. By Seider, Aaron M.. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2013CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Pp. x + 229. Hardback £55, ISBN: 978-1-107-03180-7.

5 Framing the Ass. Literary Texture in Apuleius' Metamorphoses. By Harrison, S. J.. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013Google Scholar. Pp. x + 293. Hardback £60, ISBN: 978-0-19-960268-1.

6 Roman Literary Culture. From Plautus to Macrobius. By Fantham, Elaine. Baltimore, MD, The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2013Google Scholar. Pp. xx + 368. 1 b/w illustration. Hardback £36.50, ISBN: 978-1-4214-0835-4; paperback £15.50, ISBN: 978-1-4214-0836-1.

7 Cicero's Pro L. Murena Oratio. Introduction and commentary by Fantham, Elaine. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013Google Scholar. Pp. vii + 224. 1 map. Hardback £64, ISBN: 978-0-19-997452-8; paperback £16.99, ISBN: 978-0-19-997453-5.

8 Roman Letters. An Anthology. Edited and translated by Zeiner-Carmichael, Noelle K.. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, and Chichester, 2014Google Scholar. Pp. xx + 197. Hardback £60, ISBN: 978-1-4443-3950-5; paperback £19.99, ISBN: 978-1-4443-3951-2.

9 The Roman Poetry of Love. Elegy and Politics in a Time of Revolution. By Spentzou, Efrossini. Classical World series. London, Bloomsbury, 2013Google Scholar. Pp. xiv + 107. Paperback £12.99, ISBN: 978-1-7809-3204-0.