No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Fall of the Roman Empire in the West: A Case of Suicide or Force Majeure?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 January 2009
Extract
Today, so we are told, there are two main views, held in Moscow and Peking, concerning the way in which the West will ultimately meet its fate; the one view that Western society can and should be overthrown by military force, the other that because of its own internal contradictions and weaknesses Western society will destroy itself without needing to be subjected, at any rate in any large degree, to external force—it will inevitably give way to the superior organization of society as revealed by the gospel of Karl Marx. This difference of opinion illustrates once again the topical relevance of the problem of the decline of the Roman Empire which has been well emphasized by F. W. Walbank, for it is paralleled by contrasting explanations of the fate which overtook the Roman world. Naturally the orthodox Marxist has not failed to emphasize the internal causes of the decline of Rome, thus providing himself, deliberately or otherwise, with an admirable historical basis for his belief as to the eventual outcome of contemporary events. But it is by no means, of course, only historians of Marxist outlook who have placed the emphasis on internal rather than external factors. Even Edward Gibbon, whose view, summed up in the famous words ‘I have described the triumph of Barbarism and Religion’, is regarded by Toynbee as a classic exposition of the view that civilizations lose their lives as the result of successful assaults upon them by external powers, recognized what might more properly be regarded as internal causes; as when he speaks of the decline of Rome as ‘the natural and inevitable effect of immoderate greatness’ or in his approval of the judgement that Septimius Severus was ‘the principal author of the decline of the Roman Empire’.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Classical Association 1963
References
page 153 note 1 Walbank, F. W., The Decline of the Roman Empire in the West (London, 1946), 3f.Google Scholar
page 153 note 2 Toynbee, Arnold J., A Study of History, vols, i–vi, abridged by Somer vell, D. C. (Oxford, 1946), 260 f.Google Scholar
page 153 note 3 Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, ed. Bury, J. B. (2nd ed., London, 1925–1929), iv. 173–4Google Scholar
page 153 note 4 Op. cit. i. 137.
page 154 note 1 Niebuhr, R., Faith and History (London, 1949), 123.Google Scholar
page 154 note 2 Op. cit. 262.
page 154 note 3 Ibid. 297.
page 155 note 1 Op. cit. 67.
page 156 note 1 Cf. most recently, Brunt, P. A., Journ. of Roman Studies, xlviii (1958), 164ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
page 156 note 2 Cf. Gordon, Mary, J.R.S. xiv (1924)Google Scholar, discussing the views of Tenney Frank, esp. 101 ff.
page 156 note 3 J.R.S. xxxiii (1943), 29–35.Google Scholar
page 157 note 1 On the ominous aspects of Italy's growing dependence on her provinces, cf. Frank, Tenney, Economic Survey of Ancient Rome (Baltimore, 1933–1940), v. 296 f.Google Scholar
page 157 note 2 Boak, A. E. R., Manpower shortage and the Fall of the Roman Empire in the West (Ann Arbor and London, 1953).Google Scholar
page 157 note 3 Cf. Brunt, P. A., J.R.S. xlviii (1958), 167f.Google Scholar; M. I. Finley, ibid. 156–64.
page 158 note 1 Trevelyan, G. M., English Social History (London, 1944), 498.Google Scholar
page 158 note 2 Forni, G., Il reclutamento delle legioni da Augusto a Diocleziano (Milan and Rome, 1953), 120ff.Google Scholar
page 158 note 3 J.R.S. xxxviii (1948), 149f.Google Scholar
page 158 note 4 Op. cit. 19f., 26, 113.
page 158 note 5 Cadoux, C. J., The Early Church and the World (Edinburgh, 1925), 281 ff., 443 ff.Google Scholar
page 159 note 1 Nilsson, M. P., Imperial Rome (London, 1926), 305 f.Google Scholar
page 159 note 2 Cadoux, C. J., op. cit. 580ff.Google Scholar
page 159 note 3 Tertullian, , Apol. 37. 4Google Scholar (trans. T. R. Glover, Loeb ed.).
page 159 note 4 Cassius Dio, Ixxii. 9. 3–6.Google Scholar
page 159 note 5 Op. cit. iv. 175.
page 159 note 6 Hammond, M., Antonine Monarchy (Rome, 1959), 180 f.Google Scholar, 200 nn. 96–98; cf. Cassius Dio, Ixxv. 2. 3–6.Google Scholar
page 160 note 1 Cf. Kraft, Konrad, Zur Rekrutierung der Alen und Kohorten am Rhein und Donau (Bern, 1951), 43 ff.Google Scholar
page 160 note 2 Script. Hist. Aug., Alex. Sev. 58. 4.Google Scholar
page 160 note 3 Cf. Miller, S. N., C.A.H. xii. 34.Google Scholar
page 161 note 1 Op. cit. v. 300.
page 161 note 2 Op. cit. 85; cf. 301: ‘The ruler whose economic innovations proved ultimately most disastrous to the Empire was Septimius Severus.’
page 161 note 3 Gary, M., History of Rome (London, 1935), 778.Google Scholar
page 161 note 4 Cf. Geer, R. M., Trans. Am. Phil. Ass. Ixvii (1936), 47 ff.Google Scholar
page 162 note 1 Pan. 7. 6Google Scholar, ‘imperaturus omnibus eligi debet ex omnibus’; but cf. also 94. 5.
page 162 note 2 Op. cit. v. 78, n. 39.
page 162 note 3 Hammond, M., op. cit. 482.Google Scholar
page 162 note 4 Tac. Ann. iii. 65. 3.Google Scholar
page 162 note 5 Dial. 41Google Scholar; some irony has not unreasonably here been suspected.
page 162 note 6 Lambrechts, P., La Composition du sénat romain de Septime Sévère à Dioclétien (193–284) (Budapest, 1937), 94f.Google Scholar
page 162 note 7 Pliny, , Ep. vi. 19.Google Scholar
page 162 note 8 Cf. Petersen, H., J.R.S. xlv (1955), 47–57.Google Scholar
page 163 note 1 Cf. Lucas, C., J.R.S. xxx (1940), 56ff.Google Scholar
page 163 note 2 Frank, Tenney, op. cit. iv. 76, 79, 102, 111–13.Google Scholar
page 163 note 3 Cf. Brunt, 's comments (op. cit. 166)Google Scholar on their use of slaves on the land without any investigation, probably, as to whether it was economical to do so.
page 163 note 4 Jones, A. H. M., Ancient Economic History (London, 1948), 14–17.Google Scholar
page 164 note 1 J.R.S. xxxviii (1948), 150.Google Scholar
page 164 note 2 Ixxviii. 9. 5.
page 164 note 3 Cf. Papyrus P. Giessen, trans. Barker, E., From Alexander to Constantine (Oxford, 1956), 273 f.Google Scholar
page 164 note 4 Rostovtzeff, M., Social and Economic History of the Roman Empire, 2nd ed., revised by Fraser, P. M. (Oxford, 1957), 536.Google Scholar
page 164 note 5 Heitland, W. E., Agricola (Cambridge, 1921), 393.Google Scholar
page 165 note 1 Op. cit. 20. Frank, Tenney, op. cit. v.90, is non-committal.Google Scholar
page 165 note 2 Cf. above, p. 158, n. 4.
page 165 note 3 Parker, H. M. D., A History of the Roman World, from a.d. 138 to 337 (2nd ed., London, 1958), 165.Google Scholar
page 165 note 4 Op. Cit. 20, 24.
page 166 note 1 For a brief discussion of these theories, cf. N. H. Baynes, op. cit.
page 166 note 2 Class. Phil, xxxvii (1942), 241 ff.Google Scholar
page 166 note 3 Smith, R. E., Service in the post-Marian Roman Army (Manchester, 1958), 71.Google Scholar Cf. E. Kornemann's view attributing the collapse of the Empire to Augustus' reduction of the armed forces, a reduction maintained by his successors (dismissed as ‘antiquated’ by Rostovtzeff).
page 166 note 4 Alföldi, A., C.A.H. xii. 211.Google Scholar
page 167 note 1 Tac. Germ. 33Google Scholar, trans. Mattingly, H. (Penguin Classics)Google Scholar; for Tacitus' purpose in writing, cf. Syme, R., Tacitus (Oxford, 1958), i. 46–48.Google Scholar
page 167 note 2 C.A.H. xii. 157; cf. 161.Google Scholar
page 167 note 3 Albertini, E., L'Empire romain (2nd ed., Paris, 1936), 281 f.Google Scholar
page 168 note 1 ‘The History of the Roman Empire, 1911–60’, J.R.S. I (1960), 152.Google Scholar
page 168 note 2 Op. cit. 35.