Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T02:45:30.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Water in the Environment/Socio-Economic Development Discourse: Sustainability, Changing Management Paradigms and Policy Responses in a Global System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2014

J. A. Allan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper provides narrative and analytical frameworks for understanding the changing approaches to the valuation, allocation and the management of water resources in the North and the South. The study emphasizes the allocative politics of this important element of environmental capital and its combination with other capitals over the last 50 years. In examining these allocative politics, the role of the concept of sustainability is demonstrated. Discursive hydro-politics are shown to mediate the contested claims on the freshwater resources required by society, the economy and the environment. An historical narrative illustrates five water management paradigms and how they conform to modernity theory. Cultural theory is shown to be particularly relevant for those wanting to support the recently evolved fifth paradigm approach to the allocation and management of water. The theory is supported by reference to the water-short Middle East and North Africa and the dialogue on large dams. The article concludes that a hydro-centric approach is inadequate; water management challenges are associated with complex and sometimes wonderfully invisible processes integral to a political economy.

Type
Articles
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 40 , Issue 2 , 2005 , pp. 181 - 199
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2005.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Respectively, Homer-Dixon, T. F., ‘On the Threshold: Environmental Changes as Causes of Acute Conflict’, International Security, 16: 1 (1991), pp. 76–116 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Homer-Dixon, T. F., ‘Environmental Scarcities and Violent Conflict: Evidence from Cases’, International Security, 19: 2 (1994), pp. 5–40 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 T. F. Homer-Dixon and V. Percival, Environmental Scarcity and Violent Conflict: Briefing Book, Washington, DC, American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1996.

3 E. Hartmann, ‘Strategic Scarcity: The Origins and Impact of Environmental Conflict Ideas’, unpublished PhD thesis, University of London, LSE, 2003, at .

4 M. Lowi, Water and Power: The Politics of a Scarce Resource in the Jordan River Basin, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1993.

5 J. Waterbury, The Nile: National Determinants of Collective Action, Newhaven, CT, Yale University Press, 2002.

6 J. A. Allan, ‘Overall Perspectives on Countries and Regions’, in P. Rogers and P. Lydon (eds), Water in the Arab World: Perspectives and Prognoses, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1994, pp. 65–100; J. A. Allan, The Middle East Water Question: Hydro-Politics and the Global Economy, London, I. B. Tauris, 2001; Allan, J. A., ‘Hydro-Peace in the Middle East: Why No Water Wars? A Case Study of the Jordan River Basin’, SAIS Journal, 22: 2 (2002), pp. 255–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 J. A. Allan, ‘The Political Economy of Water [In The Jordan Basin]: Reasons for Optimism but Long Term Caution’, in J. A. Allan, Water, Peace and the Middle East: Negotiating Resources in the Jordan Basin, London, Tauris Academic Studies, 1996, pp. 75–120; J. A. Allan, ‘Virtual Water – Economically Invisible and Politically Silent: A Way to Solve Strategic Water Problems’, International Water and Irrigation Journal (November 2001), pp. 4–11; Allan, ‘Hydro-Peace in the Middle East’; A. Y. Hoekstra and P. Q. Hung, Virtual Water Trade: A Quantification of Virtual Water Flows between Nations in Relation to International Crop Trade, Value of Water Research Report Series 11, Delft, IHE Delft, 2002; A. Y. Hoekstra (ed.), Virtual Water Trade: Proceedings of the International Expert Meeting on Virtual Water Trade, IHE Delft, The Netherlands, 12–13 December 2002, Value of Water Research Report Series 12, Delft, IHE, Delft, 2003.

8 P. K. Wouters, ‘International Water Law’, unpublished doctoral thesis, Geneva, Graduate Institute of International Studies and University of Geneva, 1998.

9 A. McCalla, ‘The Water, Food and Trade Nexus’, paper delivered at the MENA-MED Conference convened by the World Bank in Marrakesh, May 1997.

10 Allan, The Middle East Water Question.

11 M. Hajer, The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1996; and J. A. Allan, ‘Contending Environmental Knowledge on Water in the Middle East: Global, Regional and National Contexts’, in P. A. Stott and S. Sullivan, Political Ecology, London, Edward Arnold, 2000, pp. 79–92.

12 Allan, ‘Hydro-Peace in the Middle East’.

13 M. Douglas and A. Wildavsky, Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technical Environmental Dangers, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1982.

14 D. Goleman, Vital Lies, Simple Truths, London, Bloomsbury, 1997.

15 Allan, The Middle East Water Question.

16 J. Bulloch and A. Darwish, Water Wars, London, Gollancz, 1993.

17 Allan, J. A., ‘Natural Resources as National Fantasies’, Geoforum (1983), pp. 243–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

18 Hoekstra and Hung, Virtual Water Trade.

19 Hoekstra, Virtual Water Trade.

20 J. Carter, Keeping Faith: Memories of a President, New York, Bantam Books, 1982; M. Reisner, Cadillac Desert, New York, Penguin Books, 1984; E. Swyngedouw, ‘Modernity and Hybridity – The Production of Nature: Water and Modernisation in Spain’, paper presented to the SOAS Water Issues Study Group, University of London, 25 January 1999; and Allan, The Middle East Water Question.

21 Swyngedouw, ‘Modernity and Hybridity’.

22 M. Thompson, ‘Socially Viable Ideas of Nature: A Cultural Hypothesis’, in E. Baark and U. Svedin (eds), Man, Nature and Technology: Essays on the Role of Ideological Perceptions, London, Macmillan Press, 1988, pp. 65–81; M. Thompson, R. Ellis and A. Widalvsky, Cultural Theory, Boulder, CO, Westview Press, 1990.

23 Allan, The Middle East Water Question.

24 S. Lee, Development of the Civil Realm in Shanghai Water Services, Occasional Paper 54, London, SOAS Water Research Group, 2003, at www.soas.ac.uk/geography/waterissues/occasionalpapers/; S. Lee, Expansion of the Private Sector in the Shanghai Water Sector, Occasional Paper 53, London, SOAS Water Research Group, 2003, at www.soas.ac.uk/geography/waterissues/occasionalpapers/.

25 P. McCulley, Silenced Rivers: The Ecology and Politics of Large Dams, London, Zed Books, 1996; A. Roy, The Cost of Living, London, HarperCollins (Flamingo), 1999.

26 World Commission on Dams, Dams and Development, London, WCD, 2001.

27 J. Briscoe, ‘Return to Resources for the World Bank’, Water21 ( June 2003), pp. 13–15.

28 Goleman, Vital Lies.

29 Leif Ohlsson, ‘Environment, Scarcity, and Conflict – A Study of Malthusian Concerns’, unpublished PhD dissertation, Department of Peace and Development Research, University of Gothenburg, 1999; L. Ohlsson and A. R. Turton, The Turning of a Screw: Social Resource Scarcity as a Bottle-Neck in Adaptation To Water Scarcity, Occasional Paper 19, London, SOAS Water Issues Group, 1999, at www.soas.ac.uk/geography/waterissues/occasionalpapers.